ADVERTISEMENT

What's your biggest concern with Pope moving forward?

I’m not saying he has to do the same thing in his first year to be successful here. I’m saying people saying it’s impossible for him to have done better have short memories.
 
Call also had one of the great recruiting classes of all time which he brought with him plus guys like Miller already on roster, hardly the situation Pope found himself in when he arrived. Your comparison is complete horse shit
So Pope can’t recruit better? Sounds like a problem.
 
My biggest concern is pope's health because of his work ethic plus the pressure of being the uk coach. I say we start a petition to force pope and his family go to a hawaiian beach every summer for 2 weeks minus his cell phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NociHTTP
I didn't go through every post to see if this is a repeat. I watched a podcast that in Popes 9 years of being a head coach, 50th was the highest defensive efficiency rating in the 9 years, and most years it hovered around 100, except for this year it's 199. Biggest concern going forward it sounds like Pope has never been a defensive minded coach. Can he change?
 
I agree, the nice guy stuff only goes so far. I want to see intensity and stop treating these players like babies. Not sure if Pope can do that though
I’m not as concerned with him being nice to players. Both him and Cal seem to think we can play defense the RIGHT way. Without fouling like they play in the league.
Our opponents are taught by the coaches to put their hands all over who they are guarding. Foul 10 times a possession. It’s insane to say but you must cheat to win anything in the SEC.
Recruiting.. Cheat
Signals…. Cheat
Defense… foul, can’t call them all.
Both CMP and Cal have wanted to win without cheating.
 
I’m not as concerned with him being nice to players. Both him and Cal seem to think we can play defense the RIGHT way. Without fouling like they play in the league.
Our opponents are taught by the coaches to put their hands all over who they are guarding. Foul 10 times a possession. It’s insane to say but you must cheat to win anything in the SEC.
Recruiting.. Cheat
Signals…. Cheat
Defense… foul, can’t call them all.
Both CMP and Cal have wanted to win without cheating.
That's an astute point. It's something I've said for years. Not just Cal and Pope. Most every UK coach. It's not that they aren't cheating. It's that the other teams in the SEC coach to play in the SEC to SEC officials. They aren't doing anything post season anyway. So they just want to play SEC basketball to bide their time to spring football. Avery Johnson was an exception at Alabama. He didn't coach to play with SEC officials and he was ousted.

And you see it in the post season. SEC teams for the most part fail when they don't have lousy SEC officials to play with. On the other hand, UK thrives, last handful of seasons excepted, when they get away from SEC officials. It's just a mindset. Do you want to be a regional team? Or do you want to be a national power?

It's slowly changing with conference expansion but if the SEC brass doesn't change to keep up then the growth will stall.
 
I didn't go through every post to see if this is a repeat. I watched a podcast that in Popes 9 years of being a head coach, 50th was the highest defensive efficiency rating in the 9 years, and most years it hovered around 100, except for this year it's 199. Biggest concern going forward it sounds like Pope has never been a defensive minded coach. Can he change?
If his defensive efficiency rating doesn't improve, it might be a short-lived experience as coach here. Yes, high octane offense is fun to watch, but that's not primarily what UK fans want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Answer1313
I didn't go through every post to see if this is a repeat. I watched a podcast that in Popes 9 years of being a head coach, 50th was the highest defensive efficiency rating in the 9 years, and most years it hovered around 100, except for this year it's 199. Biggest concern going forward it sounds like Pope has never been a defensive minded coach. Can he change?
Yeah, that’s the troubling part. I’d like to think this year’s defensive woes are just a one off exception, but the truth is that for his entire career the story of Pope’s teams has basically been the same: good offense, bad defense.

I love the good offense part, but he’s gonna have to make some changes to his defensive approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: king of cali
I also believe this is the reason for the lackluster defensive performances that has plagued this team, and why this team has been called soft!

Pope better learn how to balance grace and getting pissed off, and soon, or he’s going to find out that high stakes D1 CBB coaching might not be what was displayed in the brochure!
How did we defend so well against UT? Did he coach differently?
 
Yeah, that’s the troubling part. I’d like to think this year’s defensive woes are just a one off exception, but the truth is that for his entire career the story of Pope’s teams has basically been the same: good offense, bad defense.

I love the good offense part, but he’s gonna have to make some changes to his defensive approach.
There is one rebuttal to the offensive approach. Nate Oats went to the final 4 last year and Alabama defensive efficiency was 100.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK90
There is one rebuttal to the offensive approach. Nate Oats went to the final 4 last year and Alabama defensive efficiency was 100.
The 2014 team defending like this enroute to the title game

Opponents Points per 100 possessions:
78.6
120.6
105.5
123.2
119.2

The 2014 was a sieve except for in the opening round game against Kansas State in their tournament wins.
 
Just surveying posts in this thread, here's what is clear:

Pope won games here that he had no business winning. That led to optimism and hope. Pope also lost games here that he had no business losing. That led to excuses and justifications. This happened in the non-conference slate, then again in the conference slate. An added element in SEC play — multiple core players injured. But still, we beat Tennessee despite this, then lost to Arky.

My biggest concern now: he continues to be wildly inconsistent and those who try to justify and excuse the losing, sit around here and justify and excuse the losing for several years (as they did with Cal).
 
Last edited:
If his defensive efficiency rating doesn't improve, it might be a short-lived experience as coach here. Yes, high octane offense is fun to watch, but that's not primarily what UK fans want.

Yeah I actually thought about this a lot today.

For so long we all were wanting Cal to play a different style of offense. Take more threes, play a more exciting brand of basketball. And in the last year, he finally did that. And the same this year under Pope.

But a part of me can't help but think that's part of the problem. The guys that make the offense run the last two seasons also happen to be the biggest liabilities on defense.

There needs to be some balance here. Or else our seasons will end poorly.
 
There is one rebuttal to the offensive approach. Nate Oats went to the final 4 last year and Alabama defensive efficiency was 100.

Nate Oats is weird. Seriously, I have no idea if he's a decent defensive coach or not.

114th
3rd
92nd
3rd
111th
40th

I don't know exactly what to make of that LOL.
 
Yeah I actually thought about this a lot today.

For so long we all were wanting Cal to play a different style of offense. Take more threes, play a more exciting brand of basketball. And in the last year, he finally did that. And the same this year under Pope.

But a part of me can't help but think that's part of the problem. The guys that make the offense run the last two seasons also happen to be the biggest liabilities on defense.

There needs to be some balance here. Or else our seasons will end poorly.
Looks like the NBA, really. A team will will 124-113 one night, then turn around and lose 133-119 the next. And most of the players could care less if they won or lost...
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Answer1313
Yeah, that’s the troubling part. I’d like to think this year’s defensive woes are just a one off exception, but the truth is that for his entire career the story of Pope’s teams has basically been the same: good offense, bad defense.

I love the good offense part, but he’s gonna have to make some changes to his defensive approach.
I agree with this. But when you point any of this out you’re labeled a troll or told to go cheer for the team in Fayetteville.

I certainly Pope can get just an average defense in the years to come to go along with a high octane offense. I have my fingers crossed.
 
Nate Oats is weird. Seriously, I have no idea if he's a decent defensive coach or not.

114th
3rd
92nd
3rd
111th
40th

I don't know exactly what to make of that LOL.

If they can defend the 2, they become good at defense.

If they can't, they are bad. They go through cycles of developing good defensive bigs, losing them, and then developing some more.

Recently, adding Omoruyi is a big help. Stephenson/Omoruyi/Dioubate is a big upgrade over their main defensive bigs from last season.
 
As you said earlier, he could have recruited better at BYU and brought those guys with him…
Oh why couldnt he have recruited better, maybe they were a mid major until last year and last years recruiting cycle was already chosen their schools before Pope made huge Big 12 wins to prove himself in a big boy conference.

His recruiting class for next year is pretty damn good, two top 25 and the other top 30.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT