You mistaken me for someone else. I want Cal gone, today. But to act like Pitino’s tenure at UK was more successful is laughable. If Pitino was half the coach some of the people on here think he is, he would have more than 1 championship, 27 years ago. If you blame it on where he was coaching, why wasn’t high profile job offers falling in his lap?
I personally think if Pitino stayed, he would have had a similar downfall, if not worse. See UL for reference. 😎
"laughable", really? I've given FACTS, EVIDENCE, DATA. All you have given is "well IF.....". IF's don't mean crap.
And I AM NOT one of those that was bellowing for the now-sleaze Pitino to replace Cal a couple months ago.
But you can't deny what he did, well no one but you can.
He took UK at it's lowest point since 1927, and the very next year had us competitive, the year after that (while on PROBATION) in a tie for 1st in SEC, and the year after that 3 seconds and a bad decision on guarding the in-bounds-guy from the F4.
Once eligible for the NCAA-T, he went:
E8 (OT loss)
F4 (OT loss)
2nd Rnd loss
E8
Championship
Runner-up
So just to compare their first 6 years (from best to worst) of eligible NCAA-T teams:
Pitino vs Cal
championship - championship (equal)
runner up - runner up (equal)
final 4 - final 4 (equal)
elite 8 - final 4 (
advantage Cal)
elite 8 - elite 8 (equal)
2nd round - NIT 1st round (
advantage Pitino)
Those 6 years are pretty equivalent.
Then you add in what Pitino had to overcome with PROBATION the first 2 years, and the utter FAILURE Cal has had the past 6-8 years. To say it should still be Cal is one thing (you're wrong, but ok I've seen worse claims), but to say it's "laughable" is utterly BEYOND STUPID.
And I don't like UL, not as much as I dislike UNCheat or Duke, but I don't like them. But I looked it up just now, and he did pretty well at UL. Again taking over a team with a losing record.
In 16 years there:
13 NCAA-T
2 NIT (including 1st year)
1 year ineligible (AT PITINO's FAULT)
The 13 NCAA-T included:
1 championship (vacated due to him CHEATING)
2 final 4
3 elite 8
1 sweet 16
Not as good as he was his 8 years at UK, not as good as Cal was his first 6-8 years at UK. But he did that with less (of a program) at his disposal, AND he certainly did MORE at UL than Cal has done in his last 8 years at UK (with more at his disposal):
2 E8's
1 S16
2 2nd rnd losses
1 1st rnd loss (worst in school history)
1 no tournament (so not applicable)
1 missed tournament (worst season at UK in 95 years)
But I get it, you are incapable of admitting you are wrong. Instead you just dig your heels in deeper.