If you crash into the car, you pay the damages...............hmmmmmm
Okay, cool, so you're only interested in bits and pieces of the replies you demand. Good to know. Have a good day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you crash into the car, you pay the damages...............hmmmmmm
No I get all that and I respect the fact that you explained the meaning behind all of that but so many people walk around on egg shells trying to be politically correct and they don’t even know why they’re doing it or the reason behind it. Wenyen Gabriel is African American. I wish politically correct whites would understand the difference.The ever-changing terms for black people is a case of best intentions at the outset, but a good example of a cause that got hijacked by the SJWs. Obviously, we all know the ugly word many people used back in the day. But we went from that to negros, colored people, and now African-American or Afro-American. The problem is that the current term is cumbersome in many ways it is used, and not always accurate. Say you meet some who fits that description and start using the AA term. Then you find out that they are not American, but Canadian. Do you then call them African-Canadian? Or maybe they are from any number of countries in Europe. What starts out as a way to get past the usage of a filthy word, becomes a never-ending pursuit of a non-offensive word, but eventually people start being offended by that term and move on to another one.
Okay, cool, so you're only interested in bits and pieces of the replies you demand. Good to know. Have a good day.
So I responded fully to another of your posts where I agreed with some of it, but now when you posted something I thought was really appropriate to the discussion and I use that section instead of the whole post, it's "bits and pieces". I didn't even ask for a reply from you.
You have a good day as well.
I must have missed the original post you're talking about. The quote notification doesn't always pop up.
Care to elaborate on what your reply meant? I don't see how it pertains to the discussion, but maybe I'm misreading the "hmmm" part. It seems like a topic like this would require more input, but again, I'm probably missing something here.
I replied to 2 of your posts. In regards to the first, I think I quoted it fully and agreed in substance with part of your take.
On this last post, I thought the line about paying for damages that you caused was very appropriate to the stance of having people pay reparations for something they had no control or part in.
The "hmmmmm" was not meant in any derogatory way toward you. Just that your analogy was very appropriate, whether you intended it to be or not.
That is all.
I see your point on the car analogy. That's why I included the caveat that I didn't pay the original owner of the car. The debt is unsettled, in that argument, which is how those in favor of reparations feel.
I'm not sure what my stance on it is, but I see the logic in the one-time payment being considered a repayment of what is owed.
Off to re-read and look for your original replies. I still don't see them in my notifications.
Yeah, but the car analogy is just terrible in general.I see your point on the car analogy. That's why I included the caveat that I didn't pay the original owner of the car. The debt is unsettled, in that argument, which is how those in favor of reparations feel.
I'm not sure what my stance on it is, but I see the logic in the one-time payment being considered a repayment of what is owed.
Off to re-read and look for your original replies. I still don't see them in my notifications.
I see your point on the car analogy. That's why I included the caveat that I didn't pay the original owner of the car. The debt is unsettled, in that argument, which is how those in favor of reparations feel.
I'm not sure what my stance on it is, but I see the logic in the one-time payment being considered a repayment of what is owed.
Off to re-read and look for your original replies. I still don't see them in my notifications.
I replied to 2 of your posts. In regards to the first, I think I quoted it fully and agreed in substance with part of your take.
On this last post, I thought the line about paying for damages that you caused was very appropriate to the stance of having people pay reparations for something they had no control or part in.
The "hmmmmm" was not meant in any derogatory way toward you. Just that your analogy was very appropriate, whether you intended it to be or not.
That is all.
But even with your caveat, you would be paying descendants of the people you caused the damage to.....I, nor anyone else, would be required to pay it.....
Then that makes her a lousy mother for sending him into slavery. He could have gone overseas if he wanted to get paid.
But even with your caveat, you would be paying descendants of the people you caused the damage to.....I, nor anyone else, would be required to pay it.....
Only quoting this post cause I don’t feel like going back to where you replied to me.
We can agree slavery was bad. I think. We can also agree that land and other things were indeed given as reparations to southern slaves, I think. But those were taken from them and given back to their plantation owners.
Is that okay? Should they have never been returned?
"I think"................that little snippet says volumes about you and your condescending attitude toward anyone who may disagree with you...............especially, since I replied to you on that very subject.
If land was taken from them, that is also bad. A lot of bad/terrible things have happened to a lot of people throughout history. You learn from it, hope to never repeat it and move on, trying to be better.
.
True, but we've seen the estate of so-and-so be responsible for things like that before. Again, I'm not arguing for or against the idea, I'm just explaining the logic behind the one-time payment.
Whoever makes it on behalf of the guilty party, and whoever receives it on behalf of the wronged, it's been made. You wouldn't need to keep making the payment.
Not IF...WAS taken back by the government.
Glad you’re okay with the government stealing from its citizens and never repaying, robbing them of the opportunity to pass that land and property aka wealth to their children.
Gonzo, I know we are going round and round, But you just mentioned the "estate of so and so would be responsible in your car analogy".
How on earth would you determine which descendants were definitely slave owners and which were definitely slave descendants?
What about a black person that moved here from Africa in 1975, etc? Would they get money, for simply being black?
Who does all the vetting?
I'm sorry, but IMHO this proposal is not feasible and would lead to more race relation problems and even serious problems among blacks who got money and those blacks who didn't. You know that and I know that.
Why isn’t it the same? It doesn’t fit your agenda?I know this is a hard concept to grasp, but playing tee ball, little league, and flag football are not in the same realm as what I'm discussing.
You have a real tough time with reading comprehension and intelligent discussion. Move on. This isn't for you.
How many people do you think live on this planet whose ancestors haven’t been enslaved? Certainly nearly all from Africa as slavery existed on that continent long before Europeans became involved (should Africans pay reparations to other Africans?). Nearly all of European descent have ancestors enslaved by Germans, Vikings,Normans, Saxons, etc. Those from the middle and Far East aren’t excluded here either. Where does your lame, near sighted PC argument begin or extend to both in reference to time and geography?I already linked an article with a logical approach to reparations. If you choose to ignore that as you do history and its context, that's on you.
The idea of reparations is not a new one and is not a "black" idea. It has been done. We, as a nation, just chose to never even attempt to make up for our past sins.
I played a sport through college with several full D1 offers including UK and Xavier. I don’t begrudge the countless hours I spent practicing, traveling, playing. My parents don’t begrudge their time or expenses. Your argument holds no weight. There are many people who play the pay me, I’ve been taken advantage of part(likely including you), who always have their hand out. Most quality people play sports to have fun, exercise, develop as individuals and team players, and so on.Countless hours in the gym, traveling across the country all summer to play against the best competition...all while playing a full season during the rest of the year and gaining their high school diploma.
I forget the name of the documentary on Netflix, but it is about amateurism or lack there of. They interviewed current and former high school stars and asked what it was they missed out on. All of them said they didn't have a regular childhood. Couldn't play with their friends, go to parties, etc...like a normal person.
This is the same for all people who achieve this level of success. Whether it be actors, musicians or atheletes.
People have this misconception that star athletes didn't work for their achievements. Natural ability exists, but they are not coasting on that.
So let’s give the entire U.S. back to all of the Native American tribes because make no mistake....via fire power and manifest destiny we took this whole country from them. So their claim precedes the slave’s claim.Not IF...WAS taken back by the government.
Glad you’re okay with the government stealing from its citizens and never repaying, robbing them of the opportunity to pass that land and property aka wealth to their children.
So make us a list of the people or charities where you’re making reparations to people. This is real life, or are you just too dumb to have taken initiative and done this for yourself. Give us a list, no-one said just randomly hand out $100 bills to black people. Show us your intelligent widespread efforts, even if the financial impact has been small. Reparations have been done before, Americans just need more leadership from the likes of you.This is just plain stupidity. Why would I pay more money any taxes when I know it's not going to be directed towards reparations like we are discussing?
I'm not talking about randomly giving out $100 bills to black people. I'm talking about an intelligent, widespread approach. But you know that. You're just too dumb to discuss real life.
His argument works to fit his agenda, but only his.So let’s give the entire U.S. back to all of the Native American tribes because make no mistake....via fire power and manifest destiny we took this whole country from them. So their claim precedes the slave’s claim.
Do you see just how convoluted this argument is?
Yes. He is literally arguing for the sake of arguing. I’ll state this as applicable to everyone who plays this card....a victim mentality will only hold you back....you cant move forward looking back. I agree we must learn from our past and grow from it and we must all do it together. I agree we have a long way to go but we have come a long way.His argument works to fit his agenda, but only his.
Let's get this moved over to The Paddock, I feel like it's taken a turn away from sports...
The history of the world is one gigantic story of rough sh*t happening to people. The descendants of every group of people can say some sh*t happened to their ancestors at one point. African Americans are not the only people to which historical atrocities have happened...
Reparations is an interesting topic that lends itself to many philosophical discussions.
Why exactly does somebody today deserve a payment for something that did not happen to them?
Is there ever a situation that justifies somebody today having to pay for something they did not partake in?
If your great great great great great grandfather murdered several people, do you owe their descendants money?
Are the descendants of poor farmers who came over on a boat long after slavery exempt?
Criminals can and should be responsible for crimes they commit, should their families, offspring, descendants be held responsible and liable to pay?
Being 20 trillion+ in debt, if the gov. ever decided to pay, where does the money come from?
Should all the reparation eligible people who've made it in life and are wealthy decline the reparation?
Do bi/mixed racial individuals get the same amount?
How much would a bi racial person who can trace their WASP roots back to slave owners, and AA roots back to slaves owe and/or be owed?
If you adopted and/or fostered African American children, could you have a legit argument to say "nah, I think I've done more than enough..."?
How much would suffice? How would the payment be paid out?
Someone takes something. Doesn’t give it back.
You don’t want those people to be made whole.
What am I missing?
Are you that ignorant of history and the idea of reparations?
Read this if you don't want to be: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/...any-honors-duty-to-pay-holocaust-victims.html
What do you do about the fact that we are so intermingled that I’m willing to bet that anyone in this country, whose families have been here for generations, have black AND white ancestry ?Ah reperations. The term that every one throws around but when yoy dive into it, you see how little sense it makes.
You want poor white people who cant feed themselves to pay for the sin of someone from over centuries ago? You're a nut and it will not be entertained.
What do we do if a black man has a tie to a slave owner?
What do you do if a white person has no slave ownership in their line?
This generation is so pussiefied and victimized its pathetic.
Congratulations BKO you just reinvented the Oreo cookieWhat do you do about the fact that we are so intermingled that I’m willing to bet that anyone in this country, whose families have been here for generations, have black AND white ancestry ?
It’s the truthCongratulations BKO you just reinvented the Oreo cookie
Seriously Bill Murray said it bestbin stripes. “We’re all Mutts”
Ah , you don’t understand capitalism. How much revenue did your pick up game generate?
It doesn’t matter if your playing checkers, if it generates millions of dollars in revenue you desrve your fair share.