ADVERTISEMENT

Welcome New OC

A lot of Dolphin fans said the same thing to Saban a while back. And Lou Holtz was a perennial loser in the league too. There’s a ton of these examples.

not belittling your point I get it and admit don’t like hearing those comments either but just think it’s hard to draw any parallels between what happens in the league and college ball. Two different sports to me
Fair point. Seeing that Tamme is excited to have this guy on board after having worked with him for a bit is pretty nice. I may be a skeptic at times, but I'm willing to change my mind. Still skeptical, but less so as more folks associated with the program share optimism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soupbean
We don't eat first which is why we need a creative approach. Major kudos for stoops going that route with coen and white.

In one season we propelled coen to one of the hottest names in the NFL. On paper we should've been able to do way better than this guy, an Arkansas te coach, or an LSU passing game coach. It's just hard to believe that's the best we had to choose from. Very disappointing.

I think they key to the hire was to keep the system largely intact especially given the late date. To that point it's a B+ hire.

Everything else will just have to wait and see. All my remarks are solely based by what's on paper which is a reflection of demonstrated performance from previous stops.
Have patience and trust Stoops. Remember what you said about Coen when he was hired:

“Iirc he was assistant qb coach. Not even the lead guy. So we could surely find someone better. But I think once Moorhead passed on it, this was as good as we could hope for. Big risk though.”
 
Have patience and trust Stoops. Remember what you said about Coen when he was hired:

“Iirc he was assistant qb coach. Not even the lead guy. So we could surely find someone better. But I think once Moorhead passed on it, this was as good as we could hope for. Big risk though.”

I said I'd be patient.

My assessment was actually correct. Moorhead would've been the better choice because he was proven but coen was as good as we could hope for. It was a big risk because he was unproven. Thanks to our opportunity, in one yes he went from unproven to a hot commodity.

I recall you laughing at those of us saying we were in real danger of losing coen and calling us stupid. I posted after the first game we'd be lucky to keep him more than one year.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ky grandpa
I said I'd be patient.

My assessment was actually correct. Moorhead would've been the better choice because he was proven but coen was as good as we could hope for. It was a big risk because he was unproven. Thanks to our opportunity, in one yes he went from unproven to a hot commodity.

I recall you laughing at those of us saying we were in real danger of losing coen and calling us stupid. I posted after the first game we'd be lucky to keep him more than one year.
LOL
You said Coen was a risk and Moorhead would have been better. Wrong and wrong.

Find where I called anyone stupid for thinking there was a danger in losing Coen. If you can, you might actually be right about something.

I said it was not worth the consternation, because it was going to be what it was going to be. Coen passed on other jobs. The one he would not pass on, he took.
 
LOL
You said Coen was a risk and Moorhead would have been better. Wrong and wrong.

Find where I called anyone stupid for thinking there was a danger in losing Coen. If you can, you might actually be right about something.

I said it was not worth the consternation, because it was going to be what it was going to be. Coen passed on other jobs. The one he would not pass on, he took.

I was right on both accounts. Moorhead is one of the best ocs in the nation. If you can get him, you do. Coen was unproven but it was obvious he was on the Joe Brady plan and would be back in the league ASAP.

Personally I don't care enough to find anything, Anyone reading this board saw them.
 
I was right on both accounts. Moorhead is one of the best ocs in the nation. If you can get him, you do. Coen was unproven but it was obvious he was on the Joe Brady plan and would be back in the league ASAP.

Personally I don't care enough to find anything, Anyone reading this board saw them.
You won’t find it because you lied.

And, you now say it was “obvious,” but a couple of weeks ago you said you just did not know. 🤦‍♂️
 
Honestly, I'm not wowed by this hire but who am I. I'll assume he's as good as Coen. We have a 66% chance at being pretty well off here. He'll either be worse than Coen, equal to Coen or better than Coen. We'll find out pretty quickly this fall.
 
Same, was thinking the Jets QB coach would be a better hire. Young, innovative guy with something to prove. Wonder if Stoops was afraid he’d be gone after a year if he was successful?

I trust Stoops with this hire, but wouldn’t say he pulled a rabbit out the hat.
But this journeyman wouldn’t leave after a year if he’s successful? Well, guess he’s averaging like 2 seasons a stop.
 
I was right on both accounts. Moorhead is one of the best ocs in the nation. If you can get him, you do. Coen was unproven but it was obvious he was on the Joe Brady plan and would be back in the league ASAP.

Personally I don't care enough to find anything, Anyone reading this board saw them.
1. Morehead left Oregon OC to take Arkon Zips head coaching job....an actual paycut. So We'd likely be in same predicament as Morehead has head coaching desires more than OC at UK,.
2. I think Stoops is done with read option style offense that is very cookie cutter-ish in college. He had a vision for what he wanted which is NFL type power offense with some solid play action off of it to throw as well. He wants to recruit kids to a NFL system....so Morehead wasn't the route to go.
 
He was only the 49ers QB coach last year, he was with the Eagles in 2020.
Usually when a quarterbacks coach leaves after spending only one season with a rookie quarterback, it could be detrimental to their growth as continuity is critical. However, this isn't the case with Scangarello. Lance will benefit from an actually useful coach. 🙄😮.
This from a San Francisco sports rider. He was fired from the Eagles ? We will know something about him by October.
 
Score of the hire is 5 of 10. I've read and heard about 49er coaches and people not caring at this guy's gone. They didn't even like him. And he's had some bad seasons and been fired at other places. I'm sorry they could have did better and I don't have a lot of faith in this guy. The hire is blah
Anyone who forms their opinion form anonymous, uniformed, sour grapes social media posts gets a 1/10 from me, in any context.
 
Here is how Stoops OC hires breakdown for me.

1. Stoops wants this type of NFL system, to run the ball and throw with good balance. Not run with the QB as primary ball carrier either. I think he likes being up under the Center instead of shotgun 100% as well.
2. We recruit to this system now...no more read option QBs, WR are big part of the offense, TE are multi functional, RB will be suited as well. QBs need to be able to move vs. run the ball but also make the throws outside the hashes, throw to windows (not necessarily players), etc.. We have some shifty, yet pure speed guys coming in, different type of OLine....I don't think Stooops wanted to reboot to a new offensive style yet.
3. Given the above and that 90% of college teams don't do anything like this style...it's hard to get other teams OC as talent pool to pick from. Then NFL OC isn't likely to see this as a lateral or step down...you're sort of pigeon holed a bit to NFL QB coaches...which is what all the candidates appeared to be.
4. Then you have the new OLine coach is from 49ers....I think that made it to Scangarello.

To be fair, Coen had all kinds of question marks a year ago as the QB coach for McVay...who runs the offense play calling. So I'd trust it and hope Woodward sticks around to ease the transition.
Except that I would add the Scangarello is a step up, experience wise, from where Stoops plucked Coen. Coen spent 2 yrs as asst WR coach and 1 yr as asst QB coach with the Rams. Scangarello was a step above that at the 49ers with some experience as an OC too. Stoops was first looking at Calabrese, who has a similar resume to Coen, and found out he could take a step up the ladder and hire Calabrese's mentor, Sacngarello.
 
Have patience and trust Stoops. Remember what you said about Coen when he was hired:

“Iirc he was assistant qb coach. Not even the lead guy. So we could surely find someone better. But I think once Moorhead passed on it, this was as good as we could hope for. Big risk though.”
I love how the internet is permanent. Too bad those who are generally naysayers usually lack introspection. Skepticism and fear were evolutionarily valuable, but as we've evolved, those traits have less value. Not everyone will evolve.
 
It is okay to be skeptical of this guy. He's not a homerun hire but Stoops appears to be elated that he was able to pluck him from the NFL - so that's saying something. He's a known QB developer (if Levis takes it to the next level - look out), and he basically runs the same system with more experience. UK can continue to point to their NFL system and NFL coaches who get you ready for the league as a big time recruiting pitch for offensive recruits.

Nothing is perfect and I have been Stoops' biggest offensive critic out there. But Coen worked out fabulously and this guys is cut from the same mold so he gets the benefit of the doubt. Cautiously optimistic he can accelerate our QB development and pick up where Coen left off.
 
I love how the internet is permanent. Too bad those who are generally naysayers usually lack introspection. Skepticism and fear were evolutionarily valuable, but as we've evolved, those traits have less value. Not everyone will evolve.
I was hopeful and excited for Dawson. Now? I am glad Stoops moved on quickly. No process is perfect, but Stoops is a better judge and has better contacts than just about everyone who posts in this forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: satcheluk
I was hopeful and excited for Dawson. Now? I am glad Stoops moved on quickly. No process is perfect, but Stoops is a better judge and has better contacts than just about everyone who posts in this forum.
Indeed. There are few, if any, who post here regularly who have the insight to critically analyze assistant football coaches. There are too many variables and virtually no one has the professional experience necessary, but so many are so sure of their opinions because they looked up their resume and heard some anonymous comments online.
 
I was right on both accounts. Moorhead is one of the best ocs in the nation. If you can get him, you do. Coen was unproven but it was obvious he was on the Joe Brady plan and would be back in the league ASAP.

Personally I don't care enough to find anything, Anyone reading this board saw them.
Joe may well thought of but he was flat out awful the one time I watched him the last time he came here with MSU. I remember joking during the game “ is this guy point shaving?!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ky grandpa
It is okay to be skeptical of this guy. He's not a homerun hire but Stoops appears to be elated that he was able to pluck him from the NFL - so that's saying something. He's a known QB developer (if Levis takes it to the next level - look out), and he basically runs the same system with more experience. UK can continue to point to their NFL system and NFL coaches who get you ready for the league as a big time recruiting pitch for offensive recruits.

Nothing is perfect and I have been Stoops' biggest offensive critic out there. But Coen worked out fabulously and this guys is cut from the same mold so he gets the benefit of the doubt. Cautiously optimistic he can accelerate our QB development and pick up where Coen left off.
I pretty much agree with your post but isnt too early to say he is or isn't a homerun hire. He hasn't even started yet. That will be determined by the results on the field. Fan excitement or lack of doesn't mean anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ky grandpa
Joe may well thought of but he was flat out awful the one time I watched him the last time he came here with MSU. I remember joking during the game “ is this guy point shaving?!”

He was not a great head coach. I think his playcalling at MSU was fine other than he didn't alter his offense to account for having an option QB.

His track record as an oc is phenomenal
 
As I've said many times, too many people derive their happiness in life by how negative they can be online. If they don't have something to gripe about, they just make something up.

But for those in here complaining, here's a dose of reality (though I know none of you will pay attention because it's easier for you to live in a fantasy world of anger).

Our offensive coordinator just got hired by the defending Super Bowl champs after 1 season. Our offensive line coach just got hired by Alabama. Our previous defensive coordinator was hired by Kansas City, one of the best franchises in the NFL. Our current defensive coordinator was offered the job at LSU, which just won a national championship 3 years ago. Our co-defensive coordinator was just hired as head coach at Troy, which has been pretty successful at identifying successful coaches. Our former DB coach was hired by Michigan, who then made the playoffs. Our assistant head coach/recruiting coordinator is one of the most well respected/successful coaches in college football.

So, Mark Stoops is pretty good at identifying coaching talent. He also had input from Coen, who as I said before, is such a rising star in the coaching ranks that he was hired to run the offense that just won the Super Bowl. All we hear about is the McVay coaching tree, and from that, he picked Coen to run his offense.

Sorry, but I'll trust all of those facts over the opinions of the negative Nancys.
Thank you for a sensible post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomBlue14
I can't say I know anything about this dude, far from it. Looking at his past stops it can make you wonder a little bit, but the fact Kyle Shanahan must think highly enough of him since he has hired him three times now is all I really need to know to be sold
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ky grandpa
I noticed that too. Even alot of insinuating he wasn't even going to be around much longer because the staff reportedly wasn't sure they wanted to trust him with Burke's development



Jimmy g was great with new England. He came to SF and got worse every year. This in his contract year, arguably he was better but not by much. Certainly nothing to warrant the moniker if QB guru for this guy.

Pretty clear at this point rabbit in a hat was the sell job Jones was given. He might turn out great, but on paper we should've been able to do much, much better
How can you say Jimmy G was great with NE? He barely played. He got mostly mop up duty.
 
He was not a great head coach. I think his playcalling at MSU was fine other than he didn't alter his offense to account for having an option QB.

His track record as an oc is phenomenal
That part is true. I couldnt believe he wasnt trying to use Fitzgerald (I think that's who it was) feet more who had killed us the year before. Just had him dropping back taking hits the whole game. Played right into us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity
That part is true. I couldnt believe he wasnt trying to use Fitzgerald (I think that's who it was) feet more who had killed us the year before. Just had him dropping back taking hits the whole game. Played right into us.
His inability to form his offense around the talent he inherited is a sign of his OC skills.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT