I see what you did there.You are a two dimensional thinker.
I see what you did there.You are a two dimensional thinker.
It's pretty crazy to see someone so completely convinced of something so incredibly absurd. I'd love to know what was gained by the thousands of scientists who lied to us throughout the years.
You haven't addressed this in this thread. Your flight model only resembles reality for flights contained in the northern hemisphere. From south to most anywhere, it falls apart.
How does a nonstop flat earth flight from Johannesburg to Sydney work? Do the airlines make you close the shades so as to not see the Himalayas?
Qantas has 6 nonstop flights per week that follow this route. The flight times correspond with the shortest possible route between two points on a great circle path.
That's a big false. I know three missionaries that make that make that trip twice per year. I don't see you having any converts in the southern hemisphere. The distances by sea have been known between one southern hemisphere continent to another for 500+ years.I have addressed it, try and book one of those flights for yourself, they don't happen because there faked.
I have addressed it, try and book one of those flights for yourself, they don't happen because there faked.
That's your defense? I have personally flown that route...
It's pretty crazy to see someone so completely convinced of something so incredibly absurd. I'd love to know what was gained by the thousands of scientists who lied to us throughout the years.
And using completely nonsensical, and down right ridiculous, memes to make his case. And with such hubris.
A chartered Quantas jet will fly you right the touch over Antarctica and let you shoot all the photos your camera can stand. If I were ever in Australia and had the time, I would seriously consider booking this. Prices start at $1199, but $7999 will keep you from having to mingle with the poors in the $1199 economy class.
http://www.antarcticaflights.com.au/home#seating
Bill, I'm just curious, do you believe in chem trails?
That's not an answer...
If you can't understand my meaning then we can't have a conversation.
Oh I understand, I just want you to say it.
Since your new here I'll let you in on a little secret, I have no intentions of playing yours or anyone else's little games. I also have no intention of rehashing every little thing I've said in this 1000 post thread so if you have something new or interesting the game on, otherwise, bye.
Wrong. Considering the abrupt change of tone from your initial post makes it VERY clear you came here specifically to play games.
Abrupt, we're 3 weeks into this thing and I've been pondering and researching all along.
Since your new here I'll let you in on a little secret, I have no intentions of playing yours or anyone else's little games. I also have no intention of rehashing every little thing I've said in this 1000 post thread so if you have something new or interesting the game on, otherwise, bye.
"Researching". And I'm talking about the tone change from 1st page alone.
It's been ME on one side vs EVERYONE else on the other. Forgive me if my 'tone' has changed over the course of this thread. You found the curve yet, theirs a reward for proving a globe earth don't ya know.
You're is the word you were looking for I believe. It's difficult to have an intelligent conversation with someone who puts himself on such a high intellectual pedestal, but does not posses the ability to use basic grammar.
Grammar nazis get ignored, final warning.
So basically one of us needs to go up into what we call 'space' and show you the curve with a non fisheye lens, and then you'll come around, right?
So we only need to do the virtually impossible for regular non-astronauts. OK. Seems reasonable.You can try, but you would fail, as I've shown over and over and over in this thread. Fish eye = curve, non fish eye = no curve no matter how high you go.
So we only need to do the virtually impossible for regular non-astronauts. OK. Seems reasonable.