The earth is a flat, non spinning realm, not a planet in an infinite universe
- Thread starter Bushy Bill
- Start date
- Status
NASA FACT:Almost all full Earth images are composite images because, I know it is hard to believe, but Earth is really f***ing big, you guys. This would be like saying that panorama picture you took with your iPhone is fake because you can see where the picture is spliced.
I find it odd that the first picture looks to be taken at exactly the same angle and lighting. Looks like someone either slapped a sepia and vignette filter on it or colorized the photo and said NASA FAKE!!!1!1!1!!1!1
Not at all, you just have ignored all of the other articles and information. I thought I would throw you a softball.
Oh, and to answer your original question. No. No one here can prove to you, well, anything.
You are just trolling.
All your articles represent are noise. I don't have answers to ever single question what I do have is a brain and I am able to use it to say that "if I can see beyond the horizon then the world probably isn't a ball". I started with that and then educated myself on refracted images, looming, superior mirages and none of those hold any water when held up to investigation. From that point I've been working to build my knowledge of how this flat realm works. I'll get to those eventually but for now they are on the periphery for me. I've read a little about topographical scattering or the possibility that they bounce signals off of the immovable dome/firmament (hello...geosynchronous satellites anyone). I don't have ALL the answers but I do have the one that is testable, repeatable and now everyone is capable of doing it, it's video evidence that we live on a flat plane.
Meanwhile, holy hell
You believe a bunch of NASholes, so
.I also have Tesla, Michelson and Morley, George Biddell Airy, and a whole host of people doing experiments that aren't funded and sanctioned by some oversight committee. You guys have all the money and every reason to perpetuate the lie (hello, 20 billion dollars a year). We have the backing of real science and the truth, and we have every Tom, Dick and Harry with a camera powerful enough to see "beyond" the horizon. The lie is going to be exposed and in the end we will be vindicated.
Good for you, and they're on my list of things to look into.
Apollo 17 took one on the way back to Earth. But, you'll just claim no space with no proof, so what's the point of dragging that circular argument back around? You can't fix stupid.How many non composite pictures of the earth exist?
Your entire argument rely's on the supposition that every picture/video ever taken anywhere at any time that see's beyond the "horizon" is the product of an optical illusion. You're in for a real shock when the new Nikon p1000 and its 125X optical zoom enters the market later this year. They won't be able to hide the secret any longer because to many people will have access to the equipment to prove (((them))) to be liars. Exciting times we live in.
this may be my most favorite thread ever on TCP/Rivals/Anywhere
Quick comment on this one:
"If people possessed even the tiniest ability to use critical thinking skills, they'd pretty easily be able to distinguish between absolute horseshit conspiracy theories and real threats."
I see conspiracies as usually being in one of three classes - this stems from my definition of "conspiracy" being the idea of 2 or more ppl colluding together to increase power or control -- over anything (so car salesmen fixing their prices to prevent undue competition IS a basic conspiracy)
Class 1 Conspiracy - Proven to be True
Examples: Nearly every political revolution you can think of (American revolution was a 'conspiracy' against the British crown....etc), also de-classifried documents showing things like CIA sponsored ""Electric Kool Aid Tests" (LSD to unwitting Johns) to be true.....dosing Af-American aviators with syhpillis and then 'treating' them with placebos.
Class 2 Conspiracy - Part Truth / Part Urban Legend
Examples: The Philadelphia experiment (yes, there were tests that led to early stealth tech - NO we didn't teleport a ship from Philadelphia to Norfolk), UFO's (yes, you have seen unidentified objects flying around that seem to defy the tech that you know we have (no, they are not from another planet), sea monsters, weather manipulation/warfare etc
Class 3 Conspiracy - Full blown Hoax-Poop
Examples: We didn't land on the moon, hollow earth with another civ-living inside, lizard-reptiialin races rule mankind behind human masks, Louisville and North Carolina are legitimate collegiate athletic programs
^^ when you look at it that way you don't have be "scared" of the word "conspiracy" --- because conspiracies DO happen
it also puts a framework around the bewildering 'truth can be stranger than fiction' world we live in
............
![[cheers]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/5628.gif "Cheers [cheers]")
No, my Chicago skyline argument is based on that. The rest is based on math and testable experiments. Your entire argument boils down to, "I saw it on YouTube and I agree with it, Hail Science!!!"
Oh, so you agree then that in some instances we can see things that should be beyond the 'horizon'. Well welcome to the team, donuts are in the break room.
Testable experiments that prove a globe earth? Show me, that's what I asked for from the very beginning.
No, I hypothesize that light travels in straight lines, but can be bent by lensing and refraction and other means to make objects below the horizon appear in the distance as a mirage. You and I most certainly are not on the same team. Never have, and never will.
I have linked several practical applications. I have personally observed every one of the in use.
But those are just noise to you.
So your contention is that every single time we see beyond the 'horizon', no matter the atmospheric conditions, that it is a mirage. Gotcha,
. What kind of sorcery allows this phenomena regardless of variables.
That is without a doubt the most intelligent response you have given in 21 pages.![[eyeroll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/rolleye/rolleye0011.r191677.gif "Eye roll [eyeroll]")
Bravo.
No, you are making assumptions because you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold water or cold air can assist the light in refracting therefore making mirages easier to happen. Heat can also distort light, ever looked down a highway on a hot summer day and seen the distortion the hot air caused by making everything look wavy? Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it isn't real.So your contention is that every single time we see beyond the 'horizon', no matter the atmospheric conditions, that it is a mirage. Gotcha,
I never said that refraction or mirages are not real phenomena. They simply do not explain EVERY image taken beyond the so called 'horizon', which is necessary for your position to be tenable.
Bushy (ZacK) you wanted video proof well here it is. And remember Sheldon is like Spock, he cannot lie. So it is definitely true.
Which of course, you can do at home if you have the equipment to do so. Mythbusters did this in their episode where they tackled the moon landings. It closed the episode to prove that man had to have went there to leave the reflectors. But hey, there's no space, right?
Pictures that you clearly have no idea what they represent because you have taken them out of context like most everything you don't understand.
Well, I'll be damned, you can do it for yourself if your don't trust them. GFY.Well I'll be darned, a TV show has never been used to spread propaganda before.
- Status
