Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hubbard shoots like that he won't be at mississippi stThank God for Reed, That Hubbard kid is gonna be a problem in the future. GREAT WIN! Go Cats!
Can't see the NBA demand for a 5'10" shooting guard.Hubbard shoots like that he won't be at mississippi st
Wore me out.Thank God for Reed, That Hubbard kid is gonna be a problem in the future. GREAT WIN! Go Cats!
That's what I was thinking not again Cal and it about got us again.Not fouling up 3 is the dumbest ass decision on the planet. Almost cost us again.
Will never learn, too arrogantThat's what I was thinking not again Cal and it about got us again.
Who fouls up 3 with 16 seconds to go?Not fouling up 3 is the dumbest ass decision on the planet. Almost cost us again.
You generally don't foul up 3 with 12 - 16 seconds left in the game. He made the correct call.Not fouling up 3 is the dumbest ass decision on the planet. Almost cost us again.
It was 11 seconds and yes you do.You generally don't foul up 3 with 12 - 16 seconds left in the game. He made the correct call.
It wasn't 11 seconds because you have to foul ahead of the shot. Even if was 11 seconds, that's still too long, and poor strategy. If they make both free throws, you are up by 1. They will foul immediately. If you miss one or both free throws, they have the ball with the final shot to win the game. That's why you generally foul with only 6 seconds or less on the clock. By the time you inbound the ball and shoot free throws it makes a last second shot for the win much less likely. You don't see coaches foul with much more than on the clock because you give the other team the last possession with perhaps a chance to win the game, depending on how the free throw shooting goes.It was 11 seconds and yes you do.
Why in the world would you call a timeout in that situation? We were scoring just as much as they were and we had the upper hand. Calling a timeout in that situation is a horrible idea. How many times have you seen a coach call a timeout only to have a spectacular play cancelled by the timeout?It was the worst end of game coaching I've ever seen with the exception of not calling a timeout at the end.
Had Reed missed the buzzer beater I guarantee you (and everyone else) would be saying they should have fouled up three.It wasn't 11 seconds because you have to foul ahead of the shot. Even if was 11 seconds, that's still too long, and poor strategy. If they make both free throws, you are up by 1. They will foul immediately. If you miss one or both free throws, they have the ball with the final shot to win the game. That's why you generally foul with only 6 seconds or less on the clock. By the time you inbound the ball and shoot free throws it makes a last second shot for the win much less likely. You don't see coaches foul with much more than on the clock because you give the other team the last possession with perhaps a chance to win the game, depending on how the free throw shooting goes.
No because you don’t extend the game when you’re up. We could have played the free throw game for 4 more possessions with that much time. Kid it an amazing low percentage shot.Had Reed missed the buzzer beater I guarantee you (and everyone else) would be saying they should have fouled up three.
No, it's just poor strategy to foul with that much time on the clock. Just because it's not 100% fail safe doesn't mean it's not the correct strategy.Had Reed missed the buzzer beater I guarantee you (and everyone else) would be saying they should have fouled up three.