Yep, could happen fairly quickly with Caleb, and consensus says he's a Cat. We'll soon see.
Dayum. Was skeptical until I read this . . .
Yep, could happen fairly quickly with Caleb, and consensus says he's a Cat. We'll soon see.
Yep, could happen fairly quickly with Caleb, and consensus says he's a Cat. We'll soon see.
why?
why?
why?
I was skeptical because I didn't think the kid was seriously considering UK.
I am starting to believe he might come because I trust Dave Kearsey, and don't think he'd put it out there unless he believed it.
Fair enough answer?
Yep, could happen fairly quickly with Caleb, and consensus says he's a Cat. We'll soon see.
Any update from your source, C8TS?
It's always good to see more confidence in our recruiting efforts from those who follow it closer than others.
I wish you had been right on your opinion that we were getting Kennard! I really wanted him badly.
Oh well.
Makes no sense to me. Both great players playing different positions. He also said UK was looking good for both. If that's the case, no disrespect to Swanigan, but I'd rather have Murray.MJ seems to think if we get Swanigan, we will be done. Like we won't keep pursuing Murray, but I don't get that. Why would CS change things with Murray?
No way I buy that.Murray has star potential and Coach Cal would keep going hard to get him.MJ seems to think if we get Swanigan, we will be done. Like we won't keep pursuing Murray, but I don't get that. Why would CS change things with Murray?
MJ seems to think if we get Swanigan, we will be done. Like we won't keep pursuing Murray, but I don't get that. Why would CS change things with Murray?
Coach Cal, is that you?I've maintained that UK needs 2 more players to fill out the roster and have competitive scrimmages in practice and they need to be a wing and big man. What a coincidence those are the two types of players UK is still recruiting.
if it was I wouldn't be driving a wrecked 2005 Honda Civic.
MJ seems to think if we get Swanigan, we will be done. Like we won't keep pursuing Murray, but I don't get that. Why would CS change things with Murray?
LOLif it was I wouldn't be driving a wrecked 2005 Honda Civic.
MJ seems to think if we get Swanigan, we will be done. Like we won't keep pursuing Murray, but I don't get that. Why would CS change things with Murray?
We have like 4 scholarshipsThere's no way in hell we won't take both Murray and Swanigan if they both want to come. Why wouldn't we? We wouldn't be out of scholly's would we? Even if we were, Cal would find a way for it to work out. Don't understand MJ's thinking on that.
What? I haven't heard that yet. Where'd you hear it?Hearing miss state now in with Swanigan....no way somebody isnt going on probation with this goofy class
Hearing miss state now in with Swanigan....no way somebody isnt going on probation with this goofy class
Where are you hearing this?
That was a load of bs. Doesn't even look or sound credible. They didn't even say much at all.
time to pin this. he can't announce until it reaches a 100 pages. for maximum effect.
Will the hate subside with #9?But if its true then im done following recruiting this year. It's been one turd after another, hate this class.
Too many horses in the stable maybe?MJ seems to think if we get Swanigan, we will be done. Like we won't keep pursuing Murray, but I don't get that. Why would CS change things with Murray?