that's right, if you take the pats on the back you have to take the criticism too. He accepts that, the Cal apologists on here do not.
Yes
that's right, if you take the pats on the back you have to take the criticism too. He accepts that, the Cal apologists on here do not.
The man is not above criticism.
Two things.
1. Some of you take this ish too seriously and need to ease up. When I was young I let this stuff ruin my day, week or even month. I was redass for about an hour. On to the next. Now, I realize teenagers throwing a ball through a hoop isn't worth kicking the dog over. This bunch is a mystery who could go to the Final Four or NIT. I don't think we have what it takes this season, but I'm not gonna lash out like a toddler over it.
2. Meltodwn nights are awful because all the coaches with 0-0 records have all the answers and the garbage posters show up and start felating each other's posts with the like button as if they're happy the team lost so they can rag on the best coach we've had since Rupp.
This thread is the first time people have actually acknowledged some of Cal's deficiencies as a coach. Yet we still have the same posters coming on and defending his every move. Cal is stubborn. It has cost him, and in my opinion it will continue to cost him. I've said that for a long time now and posters are finally seeing what I have been talking about. Cal's national titles will end with just the one. Anthony Davis isn't walking through that door. One and Done for Cal with titles at UK.
Now you see why so many call this the Raftards.
![]()
Are you new to the site when the bball team loses?
No, serious question.
Did anyone calling for a zone notice that late in the first half we went 2-3 for exactly one possession? We gave up a layup and immediately switched back out of it.
No. You're just a horrible poster and know nothing about basketball. That's not Cal's fault. How many No. 1 recruiting classes did he land at UMass or Memphis?I've been saying it all along and it's the absolute truth. He's an excellent recruiter but a horrible x's and o's coach.
This 1,000,000 times.Well OP, I can tell you what I know. And what I know is this...
You and CUT-NETS are the dumbest f**king posters on this entire board and give Kentucky fans a bad look.
Does Cal have faults? Yes. Do I think he's the greatest coach ever? No. Is he the best coach for our program? Look at the results. While Calipari has his shortcomings that have cost him, and will continue to cost him, I still think he's the best coach for our program. I will give him criticism, and he will accept it, as he does from other fans. There are far and few between HOF coaches who will fall on the sword for their players the way he has.
We can all play the woulda, shoulda, coulda scenario a thousand times over. But why do those scenarios only apply to Cal's tenure?
@CUT-NETS, since you're so high on Pitino, why didn't he put a man to guard Hill on the inbounds pass in 92? Why didn't he play DA in the 97 championship game? Apparently he was dunking in practice and could've played. Does that mean Pitino's title in 96 means little? No, it doesn't.
Ya'll better appreciate Cal while we got him, cause I would bet that you two d*ck-turds are some of the first posters to start complaining about the next coach we get.
You two should seriously go root for another team, cause not a single poster on this board will notice nor miss you.
That's the downside of opening your mouth and expressing yourself - you sort of can't help but reveal you're dummy.I've been saying it all along and it's the absolute truth. He's an excellent recruiter but a horrible x's and o's coach.
No missed that. What defense were we in when they scored the other 82?![]()
Everyone has flaws. Some here are Rival fans posing as UK fans just to stir us up..... And some are real UK fans.... I think the real UK fans who are bashing Cal's coaching for his flaws just don't watch other teams enough.... because if they did, they'd be able to spot K's flaws.... (we should all remember Pitino's flaws) Roy Williams' flaws, Bill Self's flaws, Tom Izzo's flaws...... etc.....
I've been saying it all along and it's the absolute truth. He's an excellent recruiter but a horrible x's and o's coach.
Because he's not! He's an excellent recruiter who is a "C" bench coach at best. He's stubborn, won't make obvious moves that need to be made and the moves he does make a lot of times hurt more than help.
We will have to have a totally stacked roster to get 9 and even that doesn't give us an overwhelming chance at it.
And to the smartasses, no I don't want him gone because there's nobody else available that's a better option. But he could be so much better than he is but refuses to be out of pride/stubbornness.
Well OP, I can tell you what I know. And what I know is this...
You and CUT-NETS are the dumbest f**king posters on this entire board and give Kentucky fans a bad look.
Does Cal have faults? Yes. Do I think he's the greatest coach ever? No. Is he the best coach for our program? Look at the results. While Calipari has his shortcomings that have cost him, and will continue to cost him, I still think he's the best coach for our program. I will give him criticism, and he will accept it, as he does from other fans. There are far and few between HOF coaches who will fall on the sword for their players the way he has.
We can all play the woulda, shoulda, coulda scenario a thousand times over. But why do those scenarios only apply to Cal's tenure?
@CUT-NETS, since you're so high on Pitino, why didn't he put a man to guard Hill on the inbounds pass in 92? Why didn't he play DA in the 97 championship game? Apparently he was dunking in practice and could've played. Does that mean Pitino's title in 96 means little? No, it doesn't.
Ya'll better appreciate Cal while we got him, cause I would bet that you two d*ck-turds are some of the first posters to start complaining about the next coach we get.
You two should seriously go root for another team, cause not a single poster on this board will notice nor miss you.
Our front court might be horrible, but it isn't because of a lack of stars placed beside their names There are a number of coaches that would love to have these horrible front court players and they would win with them. If the two coaches switched players, UT would still win.
Did anyone calling for a zone notice that late in the first half we went 2-3 for exactly one possession? We gave up a layup and immediately switched back out of it.
We really need a list of those who practice such dumbassery. My thinking is it's way less than you'd think. The way I think of it is - if there were a thousand of us standing in a big room, and 10 people consistently got the mic and made stupid, crazed, paranoid, dumbassery statements, that's easy to visualize and absorb, and you'd say "Well, we got a few nuts in the crowd tonight."Good God, I knew the usual dumbassery would come out after this game. Cut nets, Zay, lmd ect ....
This reads like a love letter to Cut-Nets. In fact, you might as well have sent it exclusively to him because no one else on this board, except a few trolls, believes the utter horseshite you're offering in this thread.
You obviously have mistaken me for someone who gives a rat's butt about what you think. Just to keep it simple so that you can understand it, I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU THINK.
Starting over every year is a personal choice. Cal takes great pride in the number of players that he sends to the NBA even if some are not ready and end up in the D league. If he took the time to develop some of his "regular" players, maybe he would have players on his teams that could act as the glue to keep his teams together while his young 5 stars learning how to play the game.
Really?
You do know Cal told Dakari, Marquis, Archie, DeAndre, and others to come back, right? You make it sound like he pushed them out the door. That's patently false and anyone paying even a minimal amount of attention would know that.
That's why I think you're whole appeal in this thread is disingenuous.