Don't give them any ideas.Good thing the NCAA doesn't impose a limit on Smiths.
Don't give them any ideas.Good thing the NCAA doesn't impose a limit on Smiths.
Don’t say that loudly . . . you’ll give themGood thing the NCAA doesn't impose a limit on Smiths.
Great minds stink alike!Don't give them any ideas.
---With offers D Smith has how could he be a 3 star?
Okay. First, the opposite is actually true. Bunchy Stallings, Josh Allen, Logan Stenberg, CRod, Quinton Bohanna, Calvin Taylor, Juice Johnson, Derrick Baity, Boogie Watson, Stephen Johnson, Yusuf Corker, Jamin Davis, Josh Ali, Kenneth Horsey, Deandre Square, Khalil Saunders, D'Eryk Jackson, Andru Phillips, TreVonn Rybka, and Jalen Geiger were, or currently are, UK starters. I think I missed several other examples but the list is long. Several of these players were All Americans or all SEC. So that false impression cannot really be defended.
At the end of the day, you sound like a fan who places more credence in online player ratings than in our coaching staff's evaluation skills. If I am wrong about that, I apologize. But your posts sound as if you distrust our staff's evaluation skills. Of course, you are perfectly free to believe whatever you want to believe, but don't be surprised when other posters disagree.
This class shall for now and evermore be known as “The Smith Class”
Well Stoops does own a Bourbon company.I like it: Smith's KY Bourbon. 110 proof. On fire!
I think what people have been saying is that with more wins we would expect on the surface better quality recruits who have a higher ranking and who have more quality offers from better programs. You are rt that some of this recruits who are lower ranked Pan out but they aren’t the norm. And vice versa. I do respect some of the staffs ability to evaluate and recruit and develop others not so much based upon results I am one who is skeptical about Scott from SCar doesn’t me more right or wrong than the others and a couple of others too. Some I would suspect are long term projects that are less likely to transfer out and “up” than others and who are probably gonna be 2nd/3rd stringers over their career. Typically the recruiting rankings lead to results on the field and improved results in the SEC etc etc. I appreciate your input and effort to putting this recruiting information on here for all of us to look at and debate. I am curious about the specifics on why we cannot seem to land top quality OTs in the past few years fro the HS ranks. Thoughts? Thanks againWe have. Otherwise we could not have responded.
Me too. And I will like it more if we get Devin Smith today.
You have every right to believe what you want. But if this is what you believe, then apparently you have determined that the initial commitments to the class, Boley, Johnson, Selm, Mizell, Lafontant, Marshall, Rodriguez, Redd, and Nichols, are unlikely to become successful SEC players. You have gotten, and will get, responses that disagree with your opinion on these players, and that should not surprise you. It doesn't mean we didn't read what you posted. We just don't agree.
Okay. First, the opposite is actually true. Bunchy Stallings, Josh Allen, Logan Stenberg, CRod, Quinton Bohanna, Calvin Taylor, Juice Johnson, Derrick Baity, Boogie Watson, Stephen Johnson, Yusuf Corker, Jamin Davis, Josh Ali, Kenneth Horsey, Deandre Square, Khalil Saunders, D'Eryk Jackson, Andru Phillips, TreVonn Rybka, and Jalen Geiger were, or currently are, UK starters. I think I missed several other examples but the list is long. Several of these players were All Americans or all SEC. So that false impression cannot really be defended.
2019 certainly wasn't one of Stoops' best classes, although Brandin Echols is starting in the NFL now while Weaver, Geiger, and Cox currently start for our football team. But if you insist that the 2019 class was the "worst in the history of the program", that's way, way wrong. I don't know your age, and I'm not implying that I do, but we have had far worse classes in the past.
No, it wasn't. Above, I listed our first 9 commitments to this class. Boley, Mizell, Selm, and Nichols are highly recruited, high upside prospects. I wouldn't sleep on the other five either.
Again, here, you will receive some disagreement. If there are decommits from this class, they will most likely be academic question marks. There are currently 19 commits. I have posted a number of times about ongoing roster numbers. Assuming there are the normal number of outbound transfers this offseason that typically leave every year, Stoops still has room for every Smith we have offered (which is a lot of Smiths) plus Brian Robinson and either Rico Scott or Kamron Mikell, plus another offensive lineman if he finds the right one. Plus some inbound transfers from the portal. It depends on how many current UK underclassmen leave. We know Nik Hall's career is in trouble because of the back injury, and there are also at least several obvious candidates to transfer out. In fact, Stoops and his staff are still contacting and offering new prospects for the 2024 class (Yannick Smith for example).
At the end of the day, you sound like a fan who places more credence in online player ratings than in our coaching staff's evaluation skills. If I am wrong about that, I apologize. But your posts sound as if you distrust our staff's evaluation skills. Of course, you are perfectly free to believe whatever you want to believe, but don't be surprised when other posters disagree.
I am not disputing any of that. Just saying that Kamron Mikell has a timeframe for making his announcement, and he is sticking to it. He could be taking various visits for a variety of reasons, but I don't believe he is taking 4 more OVs in the next 7 weeks just for kicks. He isn't sure yet. That's my interpretation. And I think he will go to school somewhere in the southeast. Not necessarily in the SEC proper, but probably so. Probably not out west. That's my conclusion, but recruiting is among the least predictable of all human behaviors.
I think what people have been saying is that with more wins we would expect on the surface better quality recruits who have a higher ranking and who have more quality offers from better programs.
You are rt that some of this recruits who are lower ranked Pan out but they aren’t the norm. And vice versa.
I do respect some of the staffs ability to evaluate and recruit and develop others
I am one who is skeptical about Scott from SCar
Some I would suspect are long term projects that are less likely to transfer out and “up” than others and who are probably gonna be 2nd/3rd stringers over their career.
No problem. Happy to help. The OT recruiting issue is an important topic. Stoops wants physical football teams. Stoops has produced some NFL OTs. Darian Kinnard was an All American here. During Stoops' best seasons, our "big blue wall" OL has stood out. What has changed? John Schlarman passed. Schlarman was a hero to his players and a man's man. Replacing someone like Schlarman or Sumrall on the staff is very diffricult because they are former UK players who knew the school and the culture, made men out of boys, and related very well to their players.I am curious about the specifics on why we cannot seem to land top quality OTs in the past few years fro the HS ranks. Thoughts? Thanks again
Yenser was a GA under Schlarman at Troy so he had that going for him too when hired. I think his coaching skills are probably average, it's his recruiting skills that are lacking. UK's had bad luck with the flop of Goodwin and the injury to Hall hasn't helped. But it seems to me UK has adopted the philosophy that they can raid the portal to get the OL they need. Whether true or not remains to be seen but M. Cox/Ford seem to be adequate.Yes, that's what some are saying. Some are far too hung up on online class rankings and especially summer class rankings. Every year, you see all this skepticism and angst in July. Then we get the Smith twins to flip and suddenly everyone is happy. It's all reactionary. Point is, July class rankings are utterly meaningless. I am one who believes you really can't say much about the importance of a class until they have been on campus for three years. This has always been my perspective.
In your opinion.
I sure hope so. Our coaches have earned that trust.
Besides his online player ranking, what do you actually know about Quaysheed Scott? He is the fastest player in our class, has good size for a safety, and wanted to be a Wildcat so much that he came here to Lexington to attend a camp and work for a scholarship. Our coaches got to work him out. And he is having an excellent season. What do you want? Casey Etienne is still out there, but they took Scott. I trust our coaches.
How is that different from other schools?
No problem. Happy to help. The OT recruiting issue is an important topic. Stoops wants physical football teams. Stoops has produced some NFL OTs. Darian Kinnard was an All American here. During Stoops' best seasons, our "big blue wall" OL has stood out. What has changed? John Schlarman passed. Schlarman was a hero to his players and a man's man. Replacing someone like Schlarman or Sumrall on the staff is very diffricult because they are former UK players who knew the school and the culture, made men out of boys, and related very well to their players.
So my short answer is that Stoops has had a tough time replacing a great OL coach who passed.
If we get into specifics, Eric Wolford recruited DT Deone Walker but didn't add enough important new players to our OL. I have never been a fan of the Yenser hire, and I said so from the very beginning. I get the appeal. He is a native Kentuckian with NFL experience in Kyle Shanahan's operation. He is a nice guy, and our players like him better than they liked Wolford. But that's like being more popular than Uzelac. And, superficially, all of that is good. It is totally fair to point out that Yenser inherited a mess last year and has managed to produce a certain amount of identifiable improvement up to this point in 2023. I won't enumerate the statistical improvements here, or argue the level of competition to this point. I have attended all the home games and also watched the Vandy game closely. There has been some improvement.
But the question is whether Yenser can evaluate, recruit, and develop talent. So far, I see no evidence Yenser can evaluate and recruit talent. To be fair, maybe he actually can, and maybe he just needs more time. But, so far, if you ask me why we can't get commitments from OTs, the most obvious explanation has been Yenser. We targeted JacQawn McRoy, Kevin Heywood, Jordan Floyd, John Wayne Oliver, Jake Hines, Ben Roebuck, and the Armstrong twins, but we have whiffed. That says something. The OT prospects from OH were Marrow recruits, but you don't sign an OT unless he is satisfied with the OL coaching process. Don't get me wrong. I hope Yenser succeeds. I am not against him. So far, though, I suspect we need a coaching and recruiting upgrade for our OL. That's just what my eyes are telling me so far.
This is entirely accurate. In the long run, you need to recruit and develop hs linemen that you can keep around the program for 4-5 years to propogate the culture and become leaders. No knock on Selm, Johnson, and Lafontant, but I am not sure yet whether Yenser can get that done.Yenser was a GA under Schlarman at Troy so he had that going for him too when hired. I think his coaching skills are probably average, it's his recruiting skills that are lacking. UK's had bad luck with the flop of Goodwin and the injury to Hall hasn't helped. But it seems to me UK has adopted the philosophy that they can raid the portal to get the OL they need. Whether true or not remains to be seen but M. Cox/Ford seem to be adequate.
We live in the era of the transfer portal. Formerly, though, it was recognized that schools invest significant resources in recruiting and developing players. So a one-year transfer redshirt was formerly imposed to discourage transferring. Players could transfer, but they had to sit out a year at their new school. UK got Kyle Macy, Derrick Anderson, Heshimu Evans, Braylon Heard, and EJ Price that way.If you go back to 2020, we currently have roughly half of the ‘20-‘22 o-line recruits on our current roster. We signed five in ‘20 and Flax is the only one remaining (Adams, Buford, Jones, Young are gone). We signed three in ‘21 and Wohlabaugh transferred leaving us Burton and Rodriguez. In the ‘22 class we also signed three and Goodwin is gone, Bingham and Hall (out for the year) are still here. So that’s six out of eleven guys we hoped could be developed who are no longer here. Of our 21 linemen on roster, we have the five listed above plus Eli Cox from the ‘19 class. We have five quality transfers, four of those are multi-year so we only lose M. Cox. We signed three guys in ‘23 and we have seven walk-ons. Seems like we’re going to continue leaning heavily on the portal but hopefully we can continue signing multi-year guys who can learn our system and occasional OADs like Rosenthal, Manning, and Cox who are plug and play. Seems like that’s Stoops plan right now but as Rembrandt said we have to get to the point where some of these freshmen are developed into two or three year starters.
I’ve said it before but the loss of Sclarman was huge, not only could he recruit and develop but he was a good man who was well respected by his peers and players. Concerning Yenser, still leaning on the side of scheme to a point as Stoops pointed in his post Vandy pressure issues with our zone blocking (as he did last year). OTOH, I think we’re still seeing some fundamental errors that come from coaching. Guess we’ll see what happens over the next 8-9 weeks.We live in the era of the transfer portal. Formerly, though, it was recognized that schools invest significant resources in recruiting and developing players. So a one-year transfer redshirt was formerly imposed to discourage transferring. Players could transfer, but they had to sit out a year at their new school. UK got Kyle Macy, Derrick Anderson, Heshimu Evans, Braylon Heard, and EJ Price that way.
At this point in history, the priorities of players are given more consideration than the developmental investments that schools have expended to recruit and coach them. It is what it is. Coach Stoops outworks most other HCs, so he has adapted to the situation and utilized the transfer portal to the advantage of our football program. But many of our significant inbound transfers (Rosenthal, Joseph, Smith, M. Cox) are here for only a year, so they plug an immediate roster need. Occasionally we get a transfer like Levis, TRob, Ford, or Bowles who can stay two years. JQ Hardaway may be here for three. But if we are ever going to have another "big blue wall" OL that actually competes for the Joe Moore Trophy, I strongly believe that will have to come primarily by recruiting and developing our own linemen over a 4-5 year period of teaching and conditioning.
If that is true, how can our program improve OL recruiting and meet the goal? Getting Liam Coen back was step #1. Now the next question is conceptually simple. Can Zach Yenser get the job done? IDK the answer yet, but I think we are probably going to know within the next 6 months.
Yes, we will see. Even if scheme is an issue, Yenser must show he can recruit. I think it is interesting that Coach Collins is Aidan Bryant's primary recruiter.I’ve said it before but the loss of Sclarman was huge, not only could he recruit and develop but he was a good man who was well respected by his peers and players. Concerning Yenser, still leaning on the side of scheme to a point as Stoops pointed in his post Vandy pressure issues with our zone blocking (as he did last year). OTOH, I think we’re still seeing some fundamental errors that come from coaching. Guess we’ll see what happens over the next 8-9 weeks.
There aren`t very many quality offensive tackles in high school and the ones out there are going to the "top" football programs. In fact, offensive tackle is the most difficult position to find and recruit. Years ago, teams would recruit tight ends and turn them into tackles. We just have to find kids with length and hope they pan out as a tackle.I think what people have been saying is that with more wins we would expect on the surface better quality recruits who have a higher ranking and who have more quality offers from better programs. You are rt that some of this recruits who are lower ranked Pan out but they aren’t the norm. And vice versa. I do respect some of the staffs ability to evaluate and recruit and develop others not so much based upon results I am one who is skeptical about Scott from SCar doesn’t me more right or wrong than the others and a couple of others too. Some I would suspect are long term projects that are less likely to transfer out and “up” than others and who are probably gonna be 2nd/3rd stringers over their career. Typically the recruiting rankings lead to results on the field and improved results in the SEC etc etc. I appreciate your input and effort to putting this recruiting information on here for all of us to look at and debate. I am curious about the specifics on why we cannot seem to land top quality OTs in the past few years fro the HS ranks. Thoughts? Thanks again
Thanks, appreciate your input.I looked at our roster again this morning. Currently, 59 scholarship underclassmen are scheduled to return in 2024. This includes Nik Hall, whose football career is known to be in some degree of jeopardy because of a back injury. It includes Trevin Wallace, who may consider early entry into the NFL draft although I am inclined to doubt that happens. It also includes an unknown number of Wildcats who will at least consider transferring out during the offseason (which happens every year). On first blush, I count at least three Wildcat underclassmen who appear hopelessly buried on our depth chart and might at least consider tranferring out. I won't name them here. But there could be more than three.
So let's pick a number. For the sake of this comment, I will make an educated guess that 55 Wildcat underclassmen will return in 2024.
I also count at least six current "seniors" who appear likely to come back next year, perhaps using a COVID year. For discussion, let's say five of them actually return. I am confident Octavious Oxendine and Tanner Bowles will be among them, and D'Eryk Jackson may also be.
All of that adds up to 60. We currently have 20 verbal commitments for our 2024 recruiting class, and I am not anticipating many (if any) decommits. So that adds up to 80.
Again, keep in mind there are some educated guesses involved here. But if these numbers are close, then Coach Stoops has about five more open scholarships to manage in this recruiting cycle. It seems that WR and OT plus uncommitted DE Brian Robinson, MO S commit Cam Dooley, and Miami DT commit Artavius Jones are the remaining 2024 recruiting priorities. How many OTs need to come in through the portal depends on several factors, most important of which will probably be how many open scholarships will actually be available for this purpose.
But in any case, we are now down to only a handful of remaining scholarships, and Coach Stoops will want to save a couple for the portal.
No worries. Although not totally predictable, I think the eventual size of our 2024 class is roughly predictable, and also of considerable interest to all of us.Thanks, appreciate your input.
Good synopsis.....it does sound like we'll be leaning on a handful of players to transfer out to even out the numbers....which always works outI looked at our roster again this morning. Currently, 59 scholarship underclassmen are scheduled to return in 2024. This includes Nik Hall, whose football career is known to be in some degree of jeopardy because of a back injury. It includes Trevin Wallace, who may consider early entry into the NFL draft although I am inclined to doubt that happens. It also includes an unknown number of Wildcats who will at least consider transferring out during the offseason (which happens every year). On first blush, I count at least three Wildcat underclassmen who appear hopelessly buried on our depth chart and might at least consider tranferring out. I won't name them here. But there could be more than three.
So let's pick a number. For the sake of this comment, I will make an educated guess that 55 Wildcat underclassmen will return in 2024.
I also count at least six current "seniors" who appear likely to come back next year, perhaps using a COVID year. For discussion, let's say five of them actually return. I am confident Octavious Oxendine and Tanner Bowles will be among them, and D'Eryk Jackson may also be.
All of that adds up to 60. We currently have 20 verbal commitments for our 2024 recruiting class, and I am not anticipating many (if any) decommits. So that adds up to 80.
Again, keep in mind there are some educated guesses involved here. But if these numbers are close, then Coach Stoops has about five more open scholarships to manage in this recruiting cycle. It seems that WR and OT plus uncommitted DE Brian Robinson, MO S commit Cam Dooley, and Miami DT commit Artavius Jones are the remaining 2024 recruiting priorities. How many OTs need to come in through the portal depends on several factors, most important of which will probably be how many open scholarships will actually be available for this purpose.
But in any case, we are now down to only a handful of remaining scholarships, and Coach Stoops will want to save a couple for the portal.
There aren`t very many quality offensive tackles in high school and the ones out there are going to the "top" football programs. In fact, offensive tackle is the most difficult position to find. We just have to find kids with length and hope they pan out as a tackle.
I'd have to look back, but since the advent of the portal it seems like 7 to 10 UK guys leave every offseason. No reason to think it won't be similar amount again.
With the current transfer portal rules, players are going to leave every Power 5 program early for their own reasons. If they are "projects", maybe they transfer to a secondary conference for more playing time. But highly recruited players also transfer if they don't receive immediate playing time of an amount that fits their expectations. This is killing AL, for example. In recent years, we have pulled a couple of highly rated transfers from LSU.As part of the earlier recruiting strategy discussion, UK signs developmental 'project' guys. If they hit, take to coaching & strength development, they are here 5 yrs. If not, that is known early (by both them & the coaches), they leave and their slot is filled by the portal to keep the age of our roster balanced.
T. Robinson, M. Cox, Bates, Flax on O. Weaver for sure on D, maybe Jackson, others on D are iffy as Covid year could figure in. Wallace needs to return.So what starters will we have to possibly replace in 24?
Offense
Leary
Davis
Horsey
Defense
Wallace
Weaver
OX
Geiger
Is this about right?
Oxendine is only a parttime starter, but he will be back in 2024. Oxendine signed in our 2020 class. Wallace is a junior and likely will be back. Wallace can leave early and try to get into the NFL draft, but I don't see a realistic scenario in which Wallace would not benefit from coming back unless he sustains a bad injury, which is unlikely but possible (but that's why they purchase insurance).So what starters will we have to possibly replace in 24?
Offense
Leary
Davis
Horsey
Defense
Wallace
Weaver
OX
Geiger
Is this about right?
How in the world did I miss Cox and Trob. I see now why Stoops and staff looking to take close to 25 for 24.T. Robinson, M. Cox, Bates, Flax on O. Weaver for sure on D, maybe Jackson, others on D are iffy as Covid year could figure in. Wallace needs to return.
Hope you’re right on Wallace. I just see him testing through the roof at a NFL combine if he’s invited. Agree he needs to come back at this point.Oxendine is only a parttime starter, but he will be back in 2024. Oxendine signed in our 2020 class. Wallace is a junior and likely will be back. Wallace can leave early and try to get into the NFL draft, but I don't see a realistic scenario in which Wallace would not benefit from coming back unless he sustains a bad injury, which is unlikely but possible (but that's why they purchase insurance).