You know, that’s not impossible. It’s unlikely but maybe Cal and Mitch are negotiating a lump sum buyout and this is how Cal makes it public.What if Cal just announces he’s retiring on the show lol 😂
You know, that’s not impossible. It’s unlikely but maybe Cal and Mitch are negotiating a lump sum buyout and this is how Cal makes it public.What if Cal just announces he’s retiring on the show lol 😂
That is the thing, those guards aren't just future pros, they produced at the college level. Maybe, just maybe, with just a little bit of game prep, and just a small tad of in game adjustments, we could have squeaked by 14 seed Oakland. If you were talking about Bradshaw, or Big Z, I would agree with the sentiment. Dilly and Reed both had 30+ point games where they shreaded good defenses.But that's what I'm telling you, we don't actually have as much college talent as people think. We have NBA potential. Yes we had one non-consensus third team all american guard who is also a massive liability on defense.
If you're talking purely from a college point of view Houston and Marquette in our region have more college talent. Our guys may be better in three years in the NBA, but not at the college level.
Did you actually watch Houston's game against A&M last night? Shead controlled that game in a way non of our players are capable of doing. Kolek is surgical in the way he picks apart defense. Newton at UConn is the same way. The main thing here is these guys are seniors and incredibly experienced. They're not going to disappear in a tournament game like Reed did against Oakland.
Should we have beaten Oakland? Absolutely. We have ten times the talent they do. But if we needed to play both Marquette and Houston to make the Final Four it wasn't happening. Both of those teams are more talented now.
This!I find it completely ludicrous that anyone with a dog in this fight would hesitate due to fear of Cal “killing it” elsewhere.
If that’s remotely factual, we’re in worse shape than I thought.
Why don't you ghost account guys have the nuts to post under your really name on here. Such a COWARDFrom the basic math skills I developed as a child.
Cal's buyout is almost 34 million. A couple of the assistants also have buyouts. They aren't that large, but they add up to a few hundred thousand.
To hire a good new coach, will require around a 5 yr 35 million deal. That breaks down to around 7 million per year. For reference, the popular choice is Drew. His current Baylor deal is over 8 years and averages 7.25 million. He only earns 5.2 the first year, but it raises each year and averages out to 7.25. He also just turned down 8.5 at UL. So, 5 years at 35 will be just a bit above his current Baylor deal, which they will counter and likely drive us to counter as well.
The 34 plus 35 is already 69. Then you have to provide perks and benefits, plus another roughly 2 million annually for assistants and staff. That adds another 10 million over 5 years. So now you're at 79 million. But you also still have to provide those assistants with benefits and perks as well.
Now, this doesn't factor in the buyout we will have to pay that school to hire their coach away, nor the payroll taxes the university has to pay on all of this.
So, that will be well over 80 million. And then you have the Elzy buyout and the new coaches contract, plus their assistants.
Are you seeing it now?
Nobody’s demanding Cal win SIX titles. They’re demanding better than zero Final Fours, 2 awful first round upsets, and a sub .500 season in 8 years.GOAT lost to a 14 and 15 seed. Mercer and Lehigh. Demanding to be better than the best is not quite realistic.
I'm a coward because I provided a breakdown of the financial costs to replace Cal? That makes no sense.Why don't you ghost account guys have the nuts to post under your really name on here. Such a COWARD
What's your real name on here? Tell me and I will retract my statement, if not Vaya Co DiosI'm a coward because I provided a breakdown of the financial costs to replace Cal? That makes no sense.
I'm a coward because I provided a breakdown of the financial costs to replace Cal? That makes no sense.
Ehh, wouldn't be a bad gig, but I'm not pc enough for that.PR person for the University?
First off, why do you care? Second, look at the name real close. What is Pb a symbol for on the periodic table of elements?What's your real name on here? Tell me and I will retract my statement, if not Vaya Co Dios
Exactly, Reed was not even on draft boards at the beginning of the year, he had a historic season lol, and he just smoked UT and their seniors two weeks ago lol.That is the thing, those guards aren't just future pros, they produced at the college level. Maybe, just maybe, with just a little bit of game prep, and just a small tad of in game adjustments, we could have squeaked by 14 seed Oakland. If you were talking about Bradshaw, or Big Z, I would agree with the sentiment. Dilly and Reed both had 30+ point games where they shreaded good defenses.
I mean Oakland played a zone, and we have 3 guys shooting over 40% from 3 on the year, and another 3 shooting 33%+, and yet we struggled to get those guys clear looks at the basket?? That is coaching. Even x-staff members say that Cal has completely quit teaching like he did when he first got here. This wasn't a 4-32 3-point performance against a top 10 team, this was a system's failure against a team that barely made the tournament. Cal didn't have trouble going to 4 final fours in 6 years with freshmen when he first got here. And those freshmen made big play after big play. We had the players to make a run this year, just didn't have a coach.
A lot of assumptions are in this though. You are assuming a lot of those things actually happen. But even if the numbers are correct(not saying you are wrong you are probably right) Kentucky still need to move onFrom the basic math skills I developed as a child.
Cal's buyout is almost 34 million. A couple of the assistants also have buyouts. They aren't that large, but they add up to a few hundred thousand.
To hire a good new coach, will require around a 5 yr 35 million deal. That breaks down to around 7 million per year. For reference, the popular choice is Drew. His current Baylor deal is over 8 years and averages 7.25 million. He only earns 5.2 the first year, but it raises each year and averages out to 7.25. He also just turned down 8.5 at UL. So, 5 years at 35 will be just a bit above his current Baylor deal, which they will counter and likely drive us to counter as well.
The 34 plus 35 is already 69. Then you have to provide perks and benefits, plus another roughly 2 million annually for assistants and staff. That adds another 10 million over 5 years. So now you're at 79 million. But you also still have to provide those assistants with benefits and perks as well.
Now, this doesn't factor in the buyout we will have to pay that school to hire their coach away, nor the payroll taxes the university has to pay on all of this.
So, that will be well over 80 million. And then you have the Elzy buyout and the new coaches contract, plus their assistants.
Are you seeing it now?
What's the assumptions?A lot of assumptions are in this though. You are assuming a lot of those things actually happen. But even if the numbers are correct(not saying you are wrong you are probably right) Kentucky still need to move on
Ehh, wouldn't be a bad gig, but I'm not pc enough for that.
First off, why do you care? Second, look at the name real close. What is Pb a symbol for on the periodic table of elements?
I don't think demanding the exact same record works. I'm not claiming Calipari is equal to K. My world allows droughts.But K went NC, Sweet Sixteen, First Round Upset, Elite Eight, First Round Upset, NC.
A bit different than:
Missed Tourney (9 wins)
First Round Upset
Second Round Upset
First Round Upset
From the basic math skills I developed as a child.
Are you seeing it now?
OMG, how can you be this stupid?Lead athletic something… essentially you’re admitting to being associated to the university?
Apparently skill and years of practice. lol. I get its lead stomach but thought you were insinuating otherwise.OMG, how can you be this stupid?
It's not just the droughts. Just following the team has been exhausting.I don't think demanding the exact same record works. I'm not claiming Calipari is equal to K. My world allows droughts.
Yell it must be a real stern meeting on that Zoom call! Shake my damn head.Cals not even back in Lexington yet
Ah, Leadbelly is still hanging around....OMG, how can you be this stupid?
The fact you all are still listening to these dudes...New info from JP:![]()
Been making and taking calls throughout the day and there is a lot of information to sift through from different angles. Here's what I know before all hell breaks loose shortly:
- Players expect to hear a final answer by Wednesday, but they've been kept out of the loop on a lot of this. Initial word was that Cal was expected to be back and coaches were still out recruiting, talking with the current players, but things have gone quiet.
- One player agent expects John Calipari to return with a complete staff overhaul, Reed Sheppard returns (among other stay/go decisions that include several outgoing transfers)
- Some dream coach possibilities may not be such wild dreams after all -- some still coaching in the tournament. If Mitch Barnhart is worried about no clear-cut options being available, he should pick up the phone and call or put out some feelers, at minimum. Maybe (and hopefully) he already has, but the pool is bigger than initially expected, from my understanding.
- The ongoing NIL conversation from today has had some real backlash, to put it lightly. Kentucky was an early favorite for one portal guard with confirmed contact who is now questioning his interest in the program (beyond coaching uncertainty, obviously). Between lucrative promises and miscommunications regarding deals, that's something that needs to get under control moving forward no matter who the coaches are.
The fact you all are still listening to these dudes...
They just want clicks for their tweets, sites and articles.
If he had real access he wouldn't have to make calls all day and only provide updates once it's clear no meeting was happening.Use realize Pilgrim has actual access to the program, right?
![]()
Some of us don't like to accept a pattern of continued failure and laziness. A pattern of failure and laziness that is there precisely because of too much job security inherent in Mitch's imbecilic contract.He always was. Some of you just don't like to accept the inevitable until it's too late.
If he had real access he wouldn't have to make calls all day and only provide updates once it's clear no meeting was happening.
If he tells you Cal is returning, you and others quit paying attention to it and move on. If he keeps stringing you along with alleged updates, you and others keep giving him hits all day.
![]()
It cas it wasn't clear, that's Jack in the front!
Sometimes stuff is leaked with an agenda and sometimes people leak stuff so they can say they were right and don’t have a clueIF what is being leaked is true, it sure doesn’t sound like someone who was prepared for this situation. Mitch has struggled with every hire he’s made.