My apologies RDfan, my intent was not to bust chops on your post. But my prose sure comes across that way. That's on me.
Oscar is a rebounding machine, and his 56% FG more than checks the efficiency box. He brings high energy with him, and 1.6 steals per game for a post player is pretty impressive. But Oscar has his share of limitations. He doesn't have any real range on his shot which makes him pretty one-dimensional on offense. Oscar gets a lot of touches but only averages 1.6 assists per game. And Oscar's undersized for a five.
Can Oscar be the main piece for a championship contender? Very few fives are, and Oscar is not the exception. Can Oscar be a major contributor on a championship contender? Yeah, I think Oscar would have played a huge role on the '86 Cardinals, the '87 Hoosiers, the '95 UCLA Bruins, the '00 Spartans, the '13 Cardinals, etc. Can a team win the championship with Oscar playing the role of a Manning from the '88 Jayhawks or Carmelo from the '03 Orangemen? Nada, Oscar doesn't have anywhere near that kind of skillset. But the suggestion/implication by Vecenie as well as others on this board that UK won't be successful with Oscar still on the roster, at least from my vantage point, is a silly argument. Even with a banged up knee, Oscar is a beast who has a major impact in the games he plays. But the fact he doesn't have the ability to carry a team on his back doesn't equate to UK being better off without Oscar.