Like SharpeNot like Reeves will be locked in if he comes back. He can go to school this summer and graduate, take advantage of facilities and trainers and tell UK to kiss his ass come August.
Like SharpeNot like Reeves will be locked in if he comes back. He can go to school this summer and graduate, take advantage of facilities and trainers and tell UK to kiss his ass come August.
I think dude is gone.
And if dude is back, in a lesser role, he’s still not a winning player. Played poorly against the best competition more often than he played well.
Again, it’s very sad that we’re in a position where fans are desperate to have a player of this quality back.
Then he can go somewhere else, where there is A LOT MORE DEPTH, and find out the hard way when a coach sits his butt for not playing defense or shooting like he's the only player on the floor. He sounds like he wants something for nothing.Reeves doesn’t want to be an 8th guy. That’s likely the issue.
Reeves would not be the 8th guy if he came back. He would be a starter or 6th manReeves doesn’t want to be an 8th guy. That’s likely the issue.
Reeves doesn’t want to be an 8th guy. That’s likely the issue.
You want a dude back that doesn't want to be here??? What could go wrong with team chemistry??? lolI still believe Reeves is an integral piece if we want to do anything next year. You can always use veteran guards/wings who can hit shots. It opens up the floor for everyone else.
And Cal has to know this. Without Reeves and no one else coming to the roster.. this team will be severely limited.
Have to get him back.
He's the only outside shooter we will have.The portal is filled with pure shit right now.If only our idiot coach had recruited over him when good guards were still out there.You want a dude back that doesn't want to be here??? What could go wrong with team chemistry??? lol
You want a dude back that doesn't want to be here??? What could go wrong with team chemistry??? lol
^^^This^^^ Reeves could be a perfect complementary player alongside the current roster. He adds efficient 3pt % on catch and shoot opportunities which would likely greatly increase with our incoming backcourt.I don't understand this. Isn't Reeves the exact type of 4th option/2nd unit guy that we'd want?
If we don't want a guy like Reeves to come back as our 8th guy, then who do we want? I think we all know that trying to make Reeves be the go-to guy was not a winning formula. But he's certainly more than capable of being a competent piece. I think the floor will open up greatly for him along side Wagner and Edwards. Or he can come in as a 2nd unit type where he will be a huge boost.
The 8th guy? He should be starting. We have no clue how good these freshmen Will or won’t beReeves doesn’t want to be an 8th guy. That’s likely the issue.
Which is exactly why his spot should not have been held. Could have gotten better in portalThat's all speculation lol. All we know right now is that Reeves is listening to other offers, which is no different than any other sport right now. Highest bidder wins.
Which is exactly why his spot should not have been held. Could have gotten better in portal
Isn’t his go to remark. “ haven’t seen em”?Yes they should. It really seems like Cal doesn't communicate with them on the regular.
Are there any good kids left to pick?? Who is NOT me first today?It's just bad that the coaching staff can't replace him with a better player. Not hard to do, he's a dime of dozen player. He wasn't even known until he played at Kentucky and this is the thanks Cal gets. Cal has picked bad players over the last 4 years.
You want a dude back that doesn't want to be here??? What could go wrong with team chemistry??? lol
Reeves would like having Meeks if he had came back Cals first year.Not me. It's going to get brutal next year without any significant veterans. It will probably be brutal anyway, but Reeves could mitigate the hemorrhaging by helping us win an extra 5 or 6 games.
Why exactly?Nice fan. Jackass.
If "loyalty to Kentucky" is your thing, you might want to rethink that. None of these guys are loyal to Kentucky for itself. They're here to get out as quickly as possible.Should Cal decline the interview with Reeves? Seems to be a guy that doesn't wanna be here which would make another Wheeler situation next season. Wear the jersey Boys or hit the road, nobody gives a shot anymore.
The solution;It’s unreal how bad the NCAA has handled the portal and NIL. It’s a bunch of bs that any coach has to recruit their own players to stay because other teams are offering them money through NIL. Jay Wright, Coach K, and Roy Williams were smart to go ahead and retire instead of dealing with that garbage.
And their coach not only encourages pushing them out, he BRAGS about doing it!!If "loyalty to Kentucky" is your thing, you might want to rethink that. None of these guys are loyal to Kentucky for itself. They're here to get out as quickly as possible.
That would be a lot better than how it is now.The solution;
End instant transfers.
Allow one transfer total, unless a coach leaves a program, and then 2 are allowed at maximum.
Keep NIL.
The instant transfer thing is killing college basketball.
I remember that great chemistry with the starting PG missing the last game.When was the last time Kentucky had team chemistry? 2020 maybe. T
As another poster pointed out no one really wants to be there anymore the way Kentucky recruits. It’s a pit stop to the draft or overseas, whatever is the best option after year one it seems.
Right now he is screaming at Cal - “Show me the Money” then throwing in some Chappell Biatcccchhhh!Then he can go somewhere else, where there is A LOT MORE DEPTH, and find out the hard way when a coach sits his butt for not playing defense or shooting like he's the only player on the floor. He sounds like he wants something for nothing.
With that post, you have proven to be both.Why exactly?
Because I want a player who may not be happy to go somewhere he will be happy?
Because I want a coach to pay for his recruiting/portal mistakes and/or letting players hold the team hostage?
Because I don't want to keep a 10 million dollar coach around who hasn't performed like a 10 million coach for years.
In other words, you think things are just going great?
I'd much rather be a jackass than a dumbass.
It would be nice to have them play for a coach that cared about winning."We want players who want this culture, who care about winning, understand what it means to play at Kentucky - both how hard and how rewarding it is." - John Calipari
So Cal will be convincing a kid who chose this culture and cared about winning, and understood what it meant to play for Kentucky, and how rewarding it can be, to come back to the same program that offers all of that?
I wonder if Ware, Fredrick, Livingston, Collins, and Wheeler also understood those same things?
Something must of happened last year behind closed doors that we may never know about. The fact that Reeves has not made his decision yet is a head scratcher. The minutes are available. The talent is at his disposal. He can have as may indorsements as he wants. His value only increases by staying in Fayette County.
When is the last time our team had a breakfast club? No Chemistry
I'm still trying to figure out who all these great players are from the portal to replace Reeves. I haven't seen them.Which is exactly why his spot should not have been held. Could have gotten better in portal
They were there early but Cal waited until nothing is left.I'm still trying to figure out who all these great players are from the portal to replace Reeves. I haven't seen them.
People keep saying Reeves sucked during big games.I don't understand this. Isn't Reeves the exact type of 4th option/2nd unit guy that we'd want?
If we don't want a guy like Reeves to come back as our 8th guy, then who do we want? I think we all know that trying to make Reeves be the go-to guy was not a winning formula. But he's certainly more than capable of being a competent piece. I think the floor will open up greatly for him along side Wagner and Edwards. Or he can come in as a 2nd unit type where he will be a huge boost.
I remember that great chemistry with the starting PG missing the last game.
People keep saying Reeves sucked during big games.
Let's see if that is true?
Opp - pts, 3pt
MSU - 5, 1-3
Gonzaga - 10, 2-7
Michigan - 11, 3-4
UCLA - 6, 2-8
Missouri - 8, 0-3
Bama - 20, 4-7
UT - 18, 2-6
TAMU - 23, 5-11
KU - 10, 0-3
Ark - 11, 1-4
UT - 8, 1-3
Auburn - 21, 4-7
Ark - 37, 2-4
Prov - 22, 5-9
KSU - 5, 1-10
So in those "big games" he averaged 14.3 pts and made 37.1% of his 3's.
Not quite as good as the other 19 games (14.5 pts & 41.2%), but FAR FROM sucking!!!
Was he streaky? Yes.
Is nearly EVERY 3pt shooter at ANY school streaky? Yes
And I proved with stats a couple months ago he was no more streaky than other good shooters like SEC-POY Miller.
People point at 1 game. Had we won that game, no one would have thought that was "the big game", no more so than Providence. He awful in our final loss. Guess what, every team except 2, lost their final game; AND in most of those losses the best players on those losing teams had a bad game (why they lost).I'll take it a step further.. let's say he did "suck", for arguments sake.. the whole team last year kind of sucked! And they had some big injuries to deal with. His point guards were shit (are we ready to say that Cason just wasn't a good PG, even if he was OK as a combo guard?), there were no other capable wings around him, PFs were weak, and after that it was really just Oscar.. who wasn't some great offensive player anyways.
You can make the argument that Reeves might have 2 or even 3 players next year, who will be better offensive players than anyone he had last season. I think the talent next year will really open his game up. He will no longer be the opposing team's focus point. They will have to worry about Wagner and Edwards, who will do a MUCH better job facilitating Edwards, than Wheeler, Cason or Livingston ever could.
So I'm not too worried about his stats last year, when the team was equally crap, especially at positions 1-3.
People point at 1 game. Had we won that game, no one would have thought that was "the big game", no more so than Providence. He awful in our final loss. Guess what, every team except 2, lost their final game; AND in most of those losses the best players on those losing teams had a bad game (why they lost).
Yes Edwards and Wagner, and maybe Dillingham will be threats to defenses, but probably not so much behind the 3pt line (except maybe Edwards). I do think teams will focus on Reeves because he is such a good shooter, and once he finds a rhythm, watch out!
We do need Reeves or some good 3pt shooter to carve out 20+ mpg though!