I stand by my point, McLain hasn't done anything to lose his spot nor has Jonathan India. Elly De La Cruz is athletic and versatile enough to play 2B, SS & 3B. Played 129 games at SS, 68 at 3B and 13 at 2B. The goal should be to get him up here ASAP this season and there is an open spot currently at 3B over Newman & Senzel. Long term I'm sure he is the everyday SS, don't dispute that at all but can't undermine the value of McLain while at it. A highly-skilled, talented player in his own right. I honestly do not see the Reds in 2023 trading India just to put McLain at 2B and EDLC at SS when you can have an infield with all 3.
It's ironic to hear some of you now think EDLC can only be the Reds SS and forget the position versatility when I have seen at least 4 people besides me here throughout this thread mention EDLC moving to the OF at some point since last year, talk about pissing away the AZFL not transitioning players from the infield to the outfield. Someone will be moving to the outfield if they plan on being a Red long term and currently the only ones with outfield experience at any level are McLain in College, Senzel & Barrero. There is room to play everyday Steer at 1B/DH along with CES, India at 2B, SS McLain & EDLC 3B and don't need to move an infielder until Marte, Jorge & Arroyo are ready. It's anyone's guess how this lineup is going to play out with the Reds infield depth to come.
As far as trading India, every player has their flaws but not sure how the guy playing through injuries throughout all of 2022, the unquestioned leader is the one being singled out as the one who the Reds should move on from. It doesn't make sense to me saying you can lose 100 games with India as if he was the problem and go on about acquiring an established starter for him. It would not only be an unpopular trade but set this team back. No India this year, a 100 loss season is likely happening again.