Haven't looked closely enough at the UL schedule to know for sure.I forget, what game did we out shoot somebody 46 ft to 10.....lol
The refs did not cost UK this game. We had a chance to win at the end of regulation and had a miscue. Our bigs had a hard time defending without fouling tonight. I know it's tough to lose a close game we had a chance to win but you really make yourself look petty when you whine about the officials. It was a great game and we saw that the Cats have a great chance to be right there at the end in march. GBB!
I agree.Just because there's a disparity in free throws doesn't mean anything.
Do people ever on this board say ANYTHING about the refs when UK has the huge disparity in their favor?
I wish the blaming ref people would at least be consistent.
So if it's 50-20 in KU's favor = refs fault.
If it's 50-20 in UK's favor = refs are fine.
Disparity means nothing. But if your gonna point to it as evidence the refs are for certain teams then do the same exact thing when it's in our favor too.
Wvu shot 47 Fts in Ku's loss at wvu.It was a historically awful game when it comes to officiating. Just look at the numbers.
We actually did get a favorable whistle in the first half. I told my brother that, but I also told him they would more than make up for it in the second half, because I knew it was coming.
KyBassfan, thats god darn bull sh*t. You said a couple of weeks ago that the aggressor gets the calls. So which is it?
Refs had very little to do with the outcome in this game. We had more fouls because of the aggressive defense.
We lost this game for two reasons. First and foremost, Kansas shot 47% versus 22% from three. Second we're razor thin on front line.
All I know is that KU, Duke, and even UofL fans are all laughing at how bad UK got hosed. Saying things like now they know how it feels, and that they wished UK was called for more fouls just to rub it in.
So, my question is; if UK truly wasn't hosed, then why are fans from those three fan bases, fan bases that would never give UK the benefit of the doubt, also saying that UK was hosed and even celebrating it?
Yeah, Kansas shooting nearly 20 free throws to UKs 0 the last 10 minutes of regulation didn't effect the game at all.
whats that bassfan? I can't understand you with the two fouls that UK just picked up during this post.
So drunk you didn't know the game was over?
If you would stop shoveling fried lard down your gullet, you might figure out my sarcasm
The whistle may have been lopsided, for me it is hard to say objectively due to blue tinted glasses. However, it's not like we didn't have chances. Lee deserved every foul he got as did Skal. It did seem like KU got more leeway on the defensive end but we still could have won.
All I'm saying is be consistent.
If your view is that difference in free throws mean one team is getting a favorable whistle, call in both ways.
Cause in the 6 years that Cal has been here we have DEFINITELY won the free throw battle the majority of the time.
And I think the fact that we arent so much this year speaks volumes to the team we currently have, not the refs.
The refs did not cost UK this game. We had a chance to win at the end of regulation and had a miscue. Our bigs had a hard time defending without fouling tonight. I know it's tough to lose a close game we had a chance to win but you really make yourself look petty when you whine about the officials. It was a great game and we saw that the Cats have a great chance to be right there at the end in march. GBB!
Isn't if funny how Ulis turns the ball over but it was Murray's fault. Sure he didn't move on the drive ... but either way ... Ulis made the turnover. In fact, if he had moved where Cal had informed him to he would have went further up on the wing, not to the corner.Murray's miscue as you labeled it didn't make Ulis turn the ball over. KU was going to pinch in on Ulis no matter what Murray did because it was the high percentage thing to do. Meaning, Ulis had a much greater chance of making that layup than Murray hitting the 3.
If you don't think the lopsided officiating didn't determine the outcome, you are either blind or a KU fan.
Anyone could see? LOL! Honestly, I could not devine the motives of the referees, so thanks for explaining this. Do you suppose we might have done better if we hadn't gotten our butts whipped so badly on the boards?It was what you call home cooking big time, anybody could see the Refs was wanting Kansas to win this was way one sided..
Drunk, Stoned??? is that all you got.![]()