Sorry. jumped the gun.I haven’t said what I think God is, but to accommodate you I’ll state that I think that God is a general concept of the human brain, devised to provide: A quick and easy explanation for the unknown; a maintenance of the social hierarchy that humans inherited during our evolution as intelligent social primates; a comfort to turn to when we experience trauma in our individual and community lives; and, most prominently, a justification for the actions we take regarding interactions between groups of humans and the use of resources in our environment.
We make war upon other groups in the “name of God,” whether defensively or, especially, offensively for a myriad of reasons; and we use the resources of our environment with an unchecked consumption because of the dominion over the world and all of its other species of life that was given to us by this being that resides only within our brains as a communal thought.
It serves me right. I don't even really want to get into the nature or form of God. My initial and only real point is that, "observably" it is just as, if not MORE plausible, at this point, that life in our physical universe had a jump start from an external force, which you could describe as God.
One thing though, that has always puzzled me, when it comes to atheists, is that inconsistencies, or perceived flaws in a religious God's will/judgement very often is cited as proof that the entire idea of a God is nonsense. Christopher Hitchens, for example, got a lot of mileage out that. (And this is not directed towards Catemus, it's just a general observation. )
Last edited: