ADVERTISEMENT

POLL: Is there a God ??

Is there a God ??

  • Yes

    Votes: 214 76.7%
  • No

    Votes: 65 23.3%

  • Total voters
    279
  • This poll will close: .
So you believe in NOTHING particles in order have SOMETHING to hang your hat upon. So where did the particles come from? That by definition is something...from nothing.
You went a very long way to simply prove you have no answer. A partical is something. Someone or something had to have created the partical. That you cannot explain. It could only happen if "God" created the partical. It didnt simply will itself into existence. Your "religion" requires something from nothing. There MUST be a creator or your partical does not exist. 1000 words of spaghetti logic doesn't change that.

Do you believe in gravity?

Particles come from particals. Or is it particals come from particles? Sience is so confusing.
 
Believing in Christ, or any other God requires faith. Faith in something you cannot see, hear, feel, touch, or even fully understand. Likewise, believing there is no God, requires just as much if not more faith; faith in more than 1 in a centillion odds of enough random events happening for life and civilization to exist. People say that science disproves the existence of God. Many of us think science actually proves the existence of God, that God and science are not an either-or preposition, but rather that God (the creator) created and uses science to create. People cite scientific theories as proof there is not God. But a theory does not prove or disprove anything, a theory provides a rational possible explanation of how something could have or may have happened. This is why/how there are lots of scientists in every dicsipline who believe in a God. Can they all be right in which set of theological beliefs are correct? No, not when many have at least some contradictions, even though they may agree much more than disagree. That doesn't mean one/some of them aren't correct. People say there is no God because of the bad (even horrible) actions that some (too many) who claim to be of certain religions. That same kind of logic is where Kentuckians got the stigma of being dumb, uneducated, cousin-marrying, ect... hillbillies. Or pick any other stereotype. There are bad people who deceive to get themselves into positions of power (whether political power, financial power, or religious power), but that does not mean all are like that or even support those deceivers. And there are good people who make mistakes/bad-choices. But most religions also promote forgiveness, because no one is perfect.

I hate either-or prepositions, especially when somebody ends a sentence with one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WildcatfaninOhio
As humans we tend to anthropomorphize everything, especially that which we don’t understand. The worst of us make up explanations for the unknown and try to foist those lies upon others, often through fear or just sheer force.

Because we think in terms of “beginning and end” and “cause and effect” doesn’t mean that those concepts have to be universal. We do not rule the Universe. We do not determine the rules of physics or existence.

It doesn’t require “blind faith” or just faith to understand that there may not be a beginning or end. We want it to be so because we could better understand it. It would fit into our tidy logic about existence.

It’s best to keep an open mind about the possibilities. Quantum mechanics has shown us that the logic of our experiences can be turned heels over head and that the physics of micro-existence is completely counter-intuitive to the existence we perceive via our senses.

It may well be that the physics of macro-existence (that which is outside and beyond our Universe) is just as counter-intuitive as is micro-existence, relative to our point of view. It didn’t require faith to discover the quantum world, just research.

The same attitude should apply to the study of what is bigger than our existence. Don’t go nuts trying to fit everything into what we know and understand. Just plod on with the theories and research and accept the discoveries as unique additions to a total, comprehensive existence.
Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I could have been in my anecdote about growing up Catholic. All religion on Earth is completely man made. We have 10 commandments because cavemen got tire of people screwing their wives and daughters and stealing their shit. Their dads and moms told them not to, but they kept doing it. So, we have to honor our parents, can's steal shit, can't screw someone we're not married to or kill people. And one day a week, we are supposed to give everyone that is trying to keep us from doing these things a breath, a rest day if you will. Every religion has the same stories in different forms. And yes, there has been plenty of bloodshed because of religion. When people start a conversation with "I'm a Christian" I immediately quit listening, because if that is what you lead with, you are generally an asshole.
 
Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I could have been in my anecdote about growing up Catholic. All religion on Earth is completely man made. We have 10 commandments because cavemen got tire of people screwing their wives and daughters and stealing their shit. Their dads and moms told them not to, but they kept doing it. So, we have to honor our parents, can's steal shit, can't screw someone we're not married to or kill people. And one day a week, we are supposed to give everyone that is trying to keep us from doing these things a breath, a rest day if you will. Every religion has the same stories in different forms. And yes, there has been plenty of bloodshed because of religion. When people start a conversation with "I'm a Christian" I immediately quit listening, because if that is what you lead with, you are generally an asshole.
From my experience when someone leads with 'I am an atheist" you are generally an asshole. Your broadbrush needs a fix. Prior to the Jews, how many of these religions you speak of had a single deity?
 
From my experience when someone leads with 'I am an atheist" you are generally an asshole. Your broadbrush needs a fix. Prior to the Jews, how many of these religions you speak of had a single deity?
And you prove many points in this thread with this post. At best, you insinuate your beliefs are superior and “correct” because you believe in a single deity. You imply you think those religions are foolish or wrong because of what they believe while trying to hold the moral high ground with extreme hypocrisy. Their beliefs are just as real as yours and have just the same probability as yours when it comes to creation and higher beings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MegaBlue05
Are you going to go to Catholic High School?
Are you considering starting to practice Christianity?

I thought surely we might see a little spark of outrage from the faithful over the "rot in hell" Christmas tweet, or E. Jean Carroll deposition, but alas, no. Once again, I was sadly disappointed.
I would say that the formally atheist Soviet Union, China and Laos that racked up tens of millions of dead...100Mil by some estimates....would find your statement to be at a minimum ill-informed. Oh, I know that the Puritans killed a few witches. My experience with deeply irreligious atheists is not good....so maybe it is the people rather than their religion or lack thereof.
It would certainly be a tall order to tally up all the murders in the history of the world and then categorize those murders by cause. However when we look at human behavior over the couple of thousands of years, Religion certainly deserves a mention. Think about the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, the Protestant/Catholic conflicts, Muslim/Jewish conflicts, all those men, women in North, Central, and South America that the "Civilized
Christian put to the sword, or burned at the stake if they refused to bend the knee.
 
Thank you! Comparing me to Hitchens is the best compliment I’ve gotten in some time. You’ve made my day.
Oh, okay. I just wanted to make sure you were aware you are intentionally incendiary and offensive. Now, you’ve made it clear that’s exactly what you’re going for!
See, most people don’t want to be thought of as jerks. My mistake!
 
This thread reminds me of a joke I’m currently making up as I type:

There are 3 horses sitting in a field when all of a sudden a loud and sputtering RV pulls up beside them with the driver staying in the car.

The first horse says “that’s an animal from the past, brought here to conjure up doom!”

The second horse says “no, you idiot, that’s a horse from the future coming to warn us of future evil!”

The third horse says “no, you dullards, neither one of you is smart enough to know what that animal is here to tell us!”

The first and second horses look at the 3rd horse and yell “Well at least we’re brave enough to pick a side, you moron!!”
 
And you prove many points in this thread with this post. At best, you insinuate your beliefs are superior and “correct” because you believe in a single deity. You imply you think those religions are foolish or wrong because of what they believe while trying to hold the moral high ground with extreme hypocrisy. Their beliefs are just as real as yours and have just the same probability as yours when it comes to creation and higher beings.
He said...EVERY RELIGION has the same stories or variations thereof. There are common stories, historical events...like the great flood. Those few on the planet thousands of years ago experienced and recorded these events, either orally or in written form. Sure. Only one version stands the test of time. I am not going to convince you, nor you I. I still contend it is much harder to believe that you and I just sprang into existence without divine intervention back at some point of "singularity".
 
He said...EVERY RELIGION has the same stories or variations thereof. There are common stories, historical events...like the great flood. Those few on the planet thousands of years ago experienced and recorded these events, either orally or in written form. Sure. Only one version stands the test of time. I am not going to convince you, nor you I. I still contend it is much harder to believe that you and I just sprang into existence without divine intervention back at some point of "singularity".
Let me put on my boots. Your BS is getting deeper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WildcatfaninOhio
Forget the Bible and religion for now. DNA, fingerprints, complexity of the brain, heart, lungs, diversity of the plant and animal kingdom, are simply not things that could realistically occur on their own, IMO. Evolution, science, etc does not adequately explain that for me.
 
Oh, okay. I just wanted to make sure you were aware you are intentionally incendiary and offensive. Now, you’ve made it clear that’s exactly what you’re going for!
See, most people don’t want to be thought of as jerks. My mistake!

It has never been my intent to be offensive. I thought you compared me to Christopher Hitchens because he was incredibly intelligent, well spoken, and made brilliant points during debates.

I ask questions and make counter points. If you find my questions and counter points offensive, that’s on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDHoss
Forget the Bible and religion for now. DNA, fingerprints, complexity of the brain, heart, lungs, diversity of the plant and animal kingdom, are simply not things that could realistically occur on their own, IMO. Evolution, science, etc does not adequately explain that for me.
Verifiable science isn't adequate but a giant, invisible man in the sky is? Make it make sense. We can literally map out how things evolved throughout time, try going to a museum.
 
Verifiable science isn't adequate but a giant, invisible man in the sky is? Make it make sense. We can literally map out how things evolved throughout time, try going to a museum.
Nobody has exactly the same fingerprints or DNA. Nobody. We solve crime with this stuff. Its not random.
 
Nobody has exactly the same fingerprints or DNA. Nobody. We solve crime with this stuff. Its not random.
Non-you people have DNA that is different from yours so that must mean that there's a giant, floaty, sky man...
If Christianity wasn't so engrained in society, that sentence would sound absolutely unhinged (it still is honestly).

I plead that you research studies on how much DNA is the exact same between two random people, it's nearly 100% and in identical twins, it is 100%. Most of our DNA determines us as human (as opposed to monkeys, bananas, etc.) rather than differentiating us from other people.
 
Forget the Bible and religion for now. DNA, fingerprints, complexity of the brain, heart, lungs, diversity of the plant and animal kingdom, are simply not things that could realistically occur on their own, IMO. Evolution, science, etc does not adequately explain that for me.

Evolution, science, etc does not adequately explain that for me.

Why not? How deeply have you delved into the subject? The more you know…
 
  • Like
Reactions: WildcatfaninOhio
Verifiable science isn't adequate but a giant, invisible man in the sky is? Make it make sense. We can literally map out how things evolved throughout time, try going to a museum.
Okay scienceboy. Explain the verifiable cause of gravity for us. And while you are being sciency....can a man have a baby too in your museum.
 
Okay scienceboy. Explain the verifiable cause of gravity for us. And while you are being sciency....can a man have a baby too in your museum.
I'm not really sure but I assume that you have a point in those incoherent sentences. The beautiful thing about living in the 21st century is that Google is free, you don't even have to pay for a museum ticket to learn about the world around you.

If you have a question about physics, you are more than capable to research that topic. You can quickly find that gravity is one of the four known fundamental interactions among a multitude of other facts that can be supported by science.

If you have a question about men having babies then you can use the fancy Google machine for that as well. There is an abundance of studies about how the human reproductive system works that have been made throughout time.

And the beautiful thing about science is that it is always updating itself as we continue to gain knowledge as opposed to a book written thousands of years ago that we try to equate to life today.
 
And the beautiful thing about science is that it is always updating itself as we continue to gain knowledge as opposed to a book written thousands of years ago that we try to equate to life today.

And, if we choose to not believe scientific theories, no one threatens us with eternal torture. That’s even more beautiful, imho.
 
Who then or what? Did they create themselves? That is totally illogical. Much saner to believe in a superior being than nothing becoming something on its own.
They could have always existed - that isn't farfetched to believe. It makes more sense than some god creating it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catemus
I'm not really sure but I assume that you have a point in those incoherent sentences. The beautiful thing about living in the 21st century is that Google is free, you don't even have to pay for a museum ticket to learn about the world around you.

If you have a question about physics, you are more than capable to research that topic. You can quickly find that gravity is one of the four known fundamental interactions among a multitude of other facts that can be supported by science.

If you have a question about men having babies then you can use the fancy Google machine for that as well. There is an abundance of studies about how the human reproductive system works that have been made throughout time.

And the beautiful thing about science is that it is always updating itself as we continue to gain knowledge as opposed to a book written thousands of years ago that we try to equate to life today.
So neither you, nor science, can explain what actually causes the apple to drop to the ground from the tree. You have THEORY. That is why they call it the gravitational THEORY...not the LAW. Because something that "weak" but important cannot be explained.

Sure we observe and theorize....but you do not know the answer, despite your incoherent words....er...um...uh...fundamental interactions...er...um...uh...multitude of...uh...um...factors...uh...you see....did I mention science? Uh, science...

Nice dodge. I don't need google. No a man cannot have a baby. Agree, or are you not a biologist.
 
He said...EVERY RELIGION has the same stories or variations thereof. There are common stories, historical events...like the great flood. Those few on the planet thousands of years ago experienced and recorded these events, either orally or in written form. Sure. Only one version stands the test of time. I am not going to convince you, nor you I. I still contend it is much harder to believe that you and I just sprang into existence without divine intervention back at some point of "singularity".
There's no such thing as a flood capable of wiping all animals from the planet.
 
They could have always existed - that isn't farfetched to believe. It makes more sense than some god creating it.
THINK.....If they could have always existed then who/what made them exist, created them? Did they just exist on their own from nothingness? That makes absolutely no sense at all.
 
So neither you, nor science, can explain what actually causes the apple to drop to the ground from the tree. You have THEORY. That is why they call it the gravitational THEORY...not the LAW. Because something that "weak" but important cannot be explained.

Sure we observe and theorize....but you do not know the answer, despite your incoherent words....er...um...uh...fundamental interactions...er...um...uh...multitude of...uh...um...factors...uh...you see....did I mention science? Uh, science...

Nice dodge. I don't need google. No a man cannot have a baby. Agree, or are you not a biologist.
Einstein explained the gravity effect more than 100 years ago. I don’t know why you’re resisting that knowledge.
 
THINK.....If they could have always existed then who/what made them exist, created them? Did they just exist on their own from nothingness? That makes absolutely no sense at all. All the matter that exists in the universe could just simply have always existed. There's no issue with that conclusion.
Why does matter have to be created? Why does there have to be a source?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catemus
There's no such thing as a flood capable of wiping all animals from the planet.
There are many flood stories and much archeological evidence of a great "flood" in the Black Sea region. Is that the origin of the various flood legends? Did it cover the planet? I don't know and it really is not "pivotal" in my belief in a divine being. Did "Noah" build an arc that had all the worlds animals. I doubt it. I understand the intent of the overall story being recounted.
 
So neither you, nor science, can explain what actually causes the apple to drop to the ground from the tree. You have THEORY. That is why they call it the gravitational THEORY...not the LAW. Because something that "weak" but important cannot be explained.

Sure we observe and theorize....but you do not know the answer, despite your incoherent words....er...um...uh...fundamental interactions...er...um...uh...multitude of...uh...um...factors...uh...you see....did I mention science? Uh, science...

Nice dodge. I don't need google. No a man cannot have a baby. Agree, or are you not a biologist.
My fault, I forgot the Bible verse that explains the complexity of gravity, you got me.

Isaac Newton? Never heard of him. Einstein? What a quack. No no, Christianity is where I go for all of my questions about science. 🙄

And since you're so worried about the topic, no, people who are born male that live their lives as men can't give birth. Trans men though... that's a discussion for a board that I'm not allowed to post in.
 
Why does matter have to be created? Why does there have to be a source?
Is that what you need to believe in order to not believe something had to start it all. Go back as far back as you wish. Past 14 billion years. Something had to create things. Belief in a divine hand is much easier to rationalize than things popping up from nothing on their own.
 
Jesus, if you believe He existed, cited Noah and the flood several times, for those who are open to the New Testament God, but not the Old Testament God. It's pretty clear to me, that the God of the Bible has emotions as we do (anger, love, etc). However in the end, a God who would die for you is pretty tough to dislike if you ask me.
 
Last edited:
There are many flood stories and much archeological evidence of a great "flood" in the Black Sea region. Is that the origin of the various flood legends? Did it cover the planet? I don't know and it really is not "pivotal" in my belief in a divine being. Did "Noah" build an arc that had all the worlds animals. I doubt it. I understand the intent of the overall story being recounted.
Why do you doubt that Noah built an arc? The Bible says he did - which raises another question - if the Word of God is the truth, then why did He make it so hard for people to agree on anything in it? I've heard so many Christians argue specifics on whether something is literal or not, etc. Why did God do a poor job of giving us his sacred Word?

My eternity supposedly hinges on my belief in God, the Bible does a poor job of conveying a singular message.
 
And you prove many points in this thread with this post. At best, you insinuate your beliefs are superior and “correct” because you believe in a single deity. You imply you think those religions are foolish or wrong because of what they believe while trying to hold the moral high ground with extreme hypocrisy. Their beliefs are just as real as yours and have just the same probability as yours when it comes to creation and higher beings.

Bingo. Complains about the broad brush while broad-brushing others of a different belief system.

I have readily admitted that I don’t know if there’s a god or gods. I’m skeptical but not confident enough to make a bold proclamation either way.

But many believers in any particular faith are confident to the point of arrogance their one sect of all the world’s religions is the one true faith and all others are wrong, made up
or stupid. In the end, if there is one, there will be a lot of wrong people who thought they were right. Either that, or if heaven is real, some of these people will be shocked if the big man lets all the different religions in. I know from my days in the church that _______ religion says I am going to hell because I don’t belong to ______ religion because only _______ religion is correct.
 
My fault, I forgot the Bible verse that explains the complexity of gravity, you got me.

Isaac Newton? Never heard of him. Einstein? What a quack. No no, Christianity is where I go for all of my questions about science. 🙄

And since you're so worried about the topic, no, people who are born male that live their lives as men can't give birth. Trans men though... that's a discussion for a board that I'm not allowed to post in.
So to sum up. Gravity THEORY is just that. There is no LAW and science does not have an answer nor does it profess to know the answer. Maybe some day. But now it is just theory. Are you so fragile in your 'belief" that you cannot acknowledge something so simple.

Trans men? You mean women (with mental issues) pretending to be men? That answer alone says much about you. You profess to live by science...while the simplest PROVEN genetic fact is XX and XY. We all can agree that a woman can have a baby even if she tries to dress like a dude. Her XX and not her pants suit defines her sex.

Please spare us the typical....there was a human in India with XXYXXYYXX chromosomes and a dong and a vagina that both worked.....we all understand that there are freak mutations. We had a football player with 11 fingers. No sane person would say finger totals are fluid.
 
Why do you doubt that Noah built an arc? The Bible says he did - which raises another question - if the Word of God is the truth, then why did He make it so hard for people to agree on anything in it? I've heard so many Christians argue specifics on whether something is literal or not, etc. Why did God do a poor job of giving us his sacred Word?

My eternity supposedly hinges on my belief in God, the Bible does a poor job of conveying a singular message.

Stories in the old testament are a combination of verbal history passed down for generations and recorded later. I do not think that every word in the old testament is to be taken literally. I believe that the universe is 13 or so billion years old and the earth about 4Bil years. We evolved but it was divinely and intelligently guided to the point we were given a soul and free will by GOD. Your eternity hinges on things in the New Testament and not on stories in the old testament. I go to church about 2 times a year so don't confuse me with Jerry Falwell.
 
Stories in the old testament are a combination of verbal history passed down for generations and recorded later. I do not think that every word in the old testament is to be taken literally. I believe that the universe is 13 or so billion years old and the earth about 4Bil years. We evolved but it was divinely and intelligently guided to the point we were given a soul and free will by GOD. Your eternity hinges on things in the New Testament and not on stories in the old testament. I go to church about 2 times a year so don't confuse me with Jerry Falwell.
The Bible is both testaments, though. If differing conclusions can be made in the old, I don't have much faith in the new either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WildcatfaninOhio
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT