ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Got anymore 2+ year old articles to dredge up after a mere three months of investigating? I'm sure the NYTimes would have been all over reporting anything that might paint Biden in a negative light. LOL.
 


The multiculturalism melting pot garbage people were sold on does not work. And you’re told to reject this trash is somehow the greatest sin of all. WGAF about being called racist? Seriously who cares?

Not all cultures are equal. In fact, a huge chunk of them are disgusting and primitive .
shocking that the guy who posts the most race-baiting threads on this forum is the one who also states WGAF about being called a racist. Didn't you say your worked in education? I really hope you weren't a classroom teacher
 
Got my Amazon/Prime bill in today. Was a lot higher than I thought it would be so I checked my account. As I suspected it was the yearly renewal charge (up to $139). Thought that's what it was since Amazon is one of these companies that just puts your membership renewal charge on your bill with no advanced warning.
In going thru my account I noticed that if you are EBT or Medicaid/low income you can get 50% off. I'm all for helping people. If someone is a Senior...worked all there life...basically living off SS....I have no problem with it.
But this doesn't seem quite right to me. You're low income. On Medicaid. But you have money to buy things off the 'net? Or stream movies, etc off the 'net? Internet costs money....oh forgot, probably get that free thru the gov't too.
Kind of seems like EBT buying chips, cokes, candy, etc.
 
So here's a Pub plan to reduce spending on Medicaid w/o cutting Medicaid. Would put all states on more equal payouts.

"An obscure set of state taxes on hospitals and other health providers is in the crosshairs of congressional budget cutters because the levies can lead to higher federal spending on Medicaid.

Known as provider taxes because states impose them on hospitals, nursing homes and other facilities that provide healthcare, the taxes boost a state’s budget for funding Medicaid. That in turn attracts more matching federal dollars to fund the program—money that is ultimately directed back to the hospitals and clinics. !!!!!

If Congress were to restrict the taxes’ use to finance state Medicaid contributions entirely, it could save more than $600 billion over a decade, (We'll see about "could".) according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office. That would go a long way toward achieving House Republicans’ plans to reduce federal spending by as much as $2 trillion to help offset the impact of extending President Trump’s income-tax cuts." !!!!!

"States have used provider taxes more heavily because of a change in federal rules starting in 2017 that allowed states, through the private insurance companies that manage state Medicaid programs, to increase payments to hospitals. Sometimes, hospitals can get rates similar to what private insurers pay."

"Thanks to the taxes, many states are able to pay higher rates to hospitals and other providers than they otherwise could afford with their general funds. And because the U.S. government will cover as much as 90% of extra Medicaid spending under federal matching rules, the provider taxes can help states expand their programs without forking over much more themselves.

Here is an example of how the taxes work: In 2022, Arizona collected $437 million in Medicaid provider tax revenue from nearly 80 hospitals, and used $363 million to increase payments to hospitals. Under the federal matching rules, Arizona was entitled to $1 billion in matching funds from the federal government for the taxes collected."

IOW, gaming the rules. Sh!t like this needs to stop!

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fact_Checker
But but... we need a new law to stop the illegal border crossings....
I watch a Christian/current events/political show that's on three nights a week. Quite often they have this evangelist on...who is conservative....but he came to the U.S. from Columbia when he was a kid. His parents did it the right way.
But whenever the topic is immigration (illegal)...the border....etc, he always brings up 'immigration reform'. Of course he says that we have to close the border first, and then 'immigration reform'.
Irritates me. If we followed all the immigration laws that have been on the books forever...no need for 'reform'.
 
It’s all fascinating. With the internet and being able to keep receipts of everything it really shows how ridiculous it all is (at least to me). Two weeks ago Democrats are saying Trump is dumb and reckless with tariffs, needs a scalpel, now Trump is weak and dumb for limited tariffs. Two years ago the stock market is not the economy and who cares about the elite 1% and their stocks. Last weak OMG the stock market is tanking. 1 month ago look at egg prices, now nothing. It’s the exact same thing for republicans as well. It’s all really dumb and a money making industry to get people to follow. I can’t tell if everyone is just in on it and it’s their form of entertainment or if people are really serious with this stupid shit.
Politics is a fan sport. It’s just like rooting for UK or U of L. That’s why people cheer Trump on doing non-conservative things like tariffs but would boo any Democrats doing the same thing. There is no logic, it’s only emotion driven. Logical and thoughtful voters are just switching sides all the time trying to figure out who is the least shitty turd these two parties have brought for our choosing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Mehico
Reforming, not Cutting Medicaid:

"... Medicaid, the fast-growing entitlement that now spends more than $850 billion a year while delivering subpar healthcare for the poor. The left and the press are trying to intimidate the GOP from addressing the program’s failures, and President Trump is already having doubts. WTF is wrong with him? But Republicans can win the Medicaid argument if they understand how the program has gone wrong, and make their case in the moral terms it deserves.

New research and polling on Medicaid work requirements help to clarify the stakes. More than six in 10 able-bodied adults on Medicaid report no earned income, according to a report from the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), a think tank. Voters tend to think of Medicaid as a safety net for low-income pregnant women and disabled Americans. But Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act expanded the program into a permanent entitlement for childless men in prime working age.

Democrats claim those on Medicaid are working. You’ll hear statistics like this one from the Kaiser Family Foundation: 92% of able-bodied Medicaid adults under age 65 worked full or part-time, or were indisposed for a good reason such as caring for a relative or attending school. But that figure is derived from government survey data, (I.e., total bs.) which are self-reported and rely on sample sizes as small as a few dozen. FGA, by contrast, obtained administrative records from state Medicaid agencies in 23 states, a far more complete picture of earnings for nearly 21 million able-bodied adults on Medicaid. It found that millions are declining to work at all, !!!!! which is damaging to the country economically and culturally."

"Medicaid ..... should be a temporary last resort, and the GOP aim should be to move as many people as possible off the Medicaid rolls and onto employer options.
"Some Republicans fear work requirements would alienate male MAGA voters, but that whiffs the politics. Some 62% of voters supported Medicaid work requirements in a recent Kaiser Family Foundation poll. That included 47% of Democrats, 60% of independents, and 82% of Republicans."

"Work as a condition for benefits is an American economic and cultural norm. If more healthy men get back into the workforce, and ultimately off Medicaid, the program will be able to focus on the poor for whom it was originally intended."

 
If we followed all the immigration laws that have been on the books forever...no need for 'reform'.
I don't know that to be true. Those are ancient. We certainly need more quality workers all the time. How many and their qualifications ought to be reviewed and updated imo.
 
If this is true, those parents are vile and evil.
"My son may go to prison, but we got this scratch. Let's get down"
I have a different take. I don't think those parents expect their kid to go to prison. Seems like I heard they have a great team of lawyers - think the OJ trial. If there is one black female on the jury, he ain't going to jail. He is the current George Floyd.
 
You know what's ancient? Common.fkn.sense.


Something being ancient doesn't mean it's bad and it certainly doesn't mean it's ineffective or obsolete. "Thou shalt not murder" is ACTUALLY 'ancient' and still on the books in just about every nation across the face of the earth. Anyone objecting to a law simply because of its age is too short sighted to take their opinion seriously.

They're either acting stupid for kicks or, worse, they actually are stupid.
 
More on the PA bomber.....

'Now, the chilling reason why Balmer went to such great lengths to allegedly try to kill Shapiro and his family has been revealed. As ABC News reported, a search warrant signed by Pennsylvania State Police revealed that Balmer decided to blow up Shapiro’s official residence “based upon perceived injustices to the people of Palestine, and “what he (Shapiro) wants to do to the Palestinian people.”
 
Yeah. You’re a good dude. Solid conservative. One of the good guys. That’s why I brought it up.

This country won’t be right until we start sending dissenting citizens to a third world prison. They need to feel the pain of disagreeing with our duly landslide elected POTUS. I know as a committed Trump supporter that you’re on board with that. If not, move to Greenland. By the grace of god and trump you’ll still be in the US within a couple months when he takes the world over as prophesied in the New Testament. If it was my call, anyone who didn’t vote for Trump would be sent to a country who would provide the pain we all want them to feel.
What a moron lol holy shit. I remember when trolls used to be funny.
 
Another one

And another. That makes three.
How many leakers...sympathetic to conservatives/Repubs are there in a Dem/lib administration?

 
Trump sure loves those Russians, all the way back to Manafort. Nothing to see hear, just a witch hunt.


FALSE. More fake news. MSN LOL you are a cartoon character.
 
Here are some facts that have been checked about NPR. Bookmark this, if you want to know why it should be eliminated with no tears shed from anyone who demands integrity.
All 87 members of their editorial staff are registered democrats. For something that is publicly funded and supposed to be "unbiased" that's pretty egregious. if nothing else they should be gutted and reformed to have accountability and equal representation from both sides of the aisle.
 
I have a different take. I don't think those parents expect their kid to go to prison. Seems like I heard they have a great team of lawyers - think the OJ trial. If there is one black female on the jury, he ain't going to jail. He is the current George Floyd.
Happened on a jury I served on in Lawton Oklahoma a few years back. Mother had abused her son to the point that his front area (chest, stomach) and his back looked like Rambo's. He also had a gash that took 14 stiches to close on his face going from the right cheek bone to just above the right eye. She said her boyfriend did it, but the boy about 7 years old testified that she did. Plus no one knew of a boyfriend at that time. She had already lost children in Illinois, and Ohio that were taken from her due to abuse and was waiting to be extradited back to those states to stand trial.

In our trial the evidence was overwhelming, but we had a black man on the jury who would not vote guilty solely because of how blacks had been treated historically and since he was not there to see it, he could not in good conscience convict on the charge of child abuse. Since there were two charges, abuse and then neglect, he settled with neglect. He had convinced others on the jury to vote not guilty, but I told him I would not and that a compromise could be met or it would be a hung jury and back to jail she would go (no bail) and that she would have to wait for another trial later on. He was pissed but agreed to the lesser count and she spent a year in prison here then was to later be as I posted before, extradited to one of the other states to stand trial there.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT