ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
You better fix the tax code then. The US taxes income, not wealth.

Mark Zuckerberg can pay himself a dollar. His networth is in the value of his holdings, in otherwords his gains are unrealized until he sells them.

For instance: similar situation is the gain taxpayers face when they purchase a home that increases in value. They don’t owe taxes on yearly increases in the home’s value. Instead, they pay taxes on the gain when they sell the house.

Oh really??? I don't think so... Called property taxes... Mine go up EVERY year. have YET to see them go down... Figure that one out.
 
I want to tax wealth. Yes.
Okay determine the wealth. How do you tax something that isn't tangible. I might have million in stocks but they might be worthless in a year.

That's unconstitutional.

Something isn't worth a million dollars unless I sell it for a million dollars.

Rich ppl don't get a check in the mail every two weeks, so im asking how you're going to do this.
 
The DOJ is so corrupt, and was so severely overcharging every defendant, while convicting them in corrupt show trials with biased juries, every single accusation about conduct on January 6 can be dismissed.

So your question is stupid. All J6 political prisoners need to be pardoned at this point because the process was such a corrupt sham.

If there was anyone who actually beat up a cop, and it’s all not just propaganda lies, then they may benefit from sweeping pardons in response to Biden’s DOJ’s corruption.

People who beat up cops shouldn’t go free, but the victims of the Biden admin’s corruption all should go free. And I’ll err on the side of protecting people from the government, not the government from the people.



As more facts have come out, it’s likely the cop that shot Ashli Babbit intentionally murdered her given his quick trigger and history. At best he should have never been in the position he was in.
Jesus Christ this is insane. So question: the people ON VIDEO who beat up police officers should’ve been charged right? Or are you saying it’s blanket immunity for them since they like Trump?

And nice to see you’re taking Babbitt side and not the police officer. I mean she was only breaking the law, had broken through the last door before getting into the house chambers, and had been warned several times to stop. But yeah it’s the cops fault
 
Oh really??? I don't think so... Called property taxes... Mine go up EVERY year. have YET to see them go down... Figure that one out.
If you have a 200k house and the assed value goes up to 300k, do you now have 100k in the bank? No. You don't get any of that "wealth" unless you sell it

Figured it out...Mark Zuckerberg pays property taxes too.

If you're asking me about about property taxes in general, I think it's garbage that you never actually own your property. I think they are garbage too.
 
Again, you type “journalists” as if that means something, just like you did with blue check marks.

Affixing a label like “journalist” to a mouthpiece of the DNC, or giving them a blue check mark, in no way means the things they are posting are true.

Whether it’s catturd, Brian stelter, joy Reid, insurrection Barbie, or whoever, I’d advise you to do your own verification and exercise critical thought.

Boggles my mind people would still go with “trust the experts” at this point in time rather than thinking for themselves.
Missing the point completely. You can like Catturd opinion all you want but he shouldn’t be a verified member for posting legit news, etc. Whether you like guys like Tapper or Hannity, etc. (I don’t like either), they at least are members of news organizations. Catturd is a dude tweeting from his couch and Musk and Trump retweet him. Thats a problem.

Bigger issue is that you think Tapper and others are the same as Catturd. They’re not. Just because you like Catturd nonsensical posts, doesn’t make him reliable news source.
 
Okay determine the wealth. How do you tax something that isn't tangible. I might have million in stocks but they might be worthless in a year.

That's unconstitutional.

Something isn't worth a million dollars unless I sell it for a million dollars.

Rich ppl don't get a check in the mail every two weeks, so im asking how you're going to do this.

I don't care about what's constitutional because when I argue policy I'm referring to changing the constitution if we have to.
  1. Income tax worked back in the day because the nation didn't have a lot of wealth and businesses were local / regional / national.
  2. We have significantly grown wealth AND the consolidation of wealth in this country.
  3. Businesses have transferred a HUGE portion of the work offshore where we don't collect the income tax we used to... this is a problem.
  4. You cannot have a good society where 0.1% of the population has like 50% of the wealth, and NEVER has to pay tax on it because a) they never sell and b) use shady loopholes when they die to avoid paying the tax.
  5. Companies are valued ALL the time. Wealth is value ALL the time. If you started a company from scratch that is worth $10B, and we tax it yearly at 1%, you can:
    1. Sell shares of that business to raise the revenue required
    2. Borrow against your asset to raise the revenue required
 
Jesus Christ this is insane. So question: the people ON VIDEO who beat up police officers should’ve been charged right? Or are you saying it’s blanket immunity for them since they like Trump?

And nice to see you’re taking Babbitt side and not the police officer. I mean she was only breaking the law, had broken through the last door before getting into the house chambers, and had been warned several times to stop. But yeah it’s the cops fault


Which convicted defendants “beat up” police officers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill - Shy Cat
Joe biden just pardoned 9/11 terrorists. Sit down.

The things you're told to get all wound up about and do is absurd.

I don't care about any of the j6 ppl (we get it, you're obssesed). Most of those cops fabricated much of their story tho, actually no, one of them...the only one allowed to testify, if we're all about facts, to name himself a hero. The reality is, Harry Dunn, for instance, showed up to work late (government employee), sat around and ate, ignored most of what was going on. Then testified to get a book deal and congressional medal. Here's all the time stamps,video proof, he lied to congress...you don't care tho, of course. Facts first!



For whatever reason, ppl like you have lost the ability for nuance. You aren't allowed to talk about that day unless you throw a tantrum of how the entire govt is supposedly in the capitol, and the entire givt would've fell, by unarmed mass of ppl with no plan. In fact, it's part of why democrats lost this election...they assumed they could literally do anything..no matter how bad the policy, corruption, etc..they could just shout "but jan 6!!!"
I don’t agree with Biden doing that at all.

Let’s stay on topic though. Trump and others keep bringing up Ashli Babbitt because it was J6 yesterday. You don’t think she should’ve been shot. You think the officers should’ve ignored their duty and let the mob into the house chambers. That’s what you’re saying?
 
If you have a 200k house and the assed value goes up to 300k, do you now have 100k in the bank? No. You don't get any of that "wealth" unless you sell it

Figured it out...Mark Zuckerberg pays property taxes too.

This is what you posted:

"For instance: similar situation is the gain taxpayers face when they purchase a home that increases in value. They don’t owe taxes on yearly increases in the home’s value. Instead, they pay taxes on the gain when they sell the house."

All you can tell me now is you did not post that. I know many who actually do state something someone never posted..

Tell me you did not post the above and then we can go forward because you most assuredly DO pay taxes on yearly increases in your homes value while you own your home. And these are only estimates of property increases and not realized increases.

What you did later was say property taxes and Mark pays them. Taxes are taxes, gains that are taxed are taxes. Whether you just say taxes or property taxes or usage taxes or city taxes or municipal taxes yadda yadda yadda...

Ole Laughmala intended to make homeowners pay unrealized gains taxes above and beyond "only" property taxes. That is more to what I think you meant.

If you mean or meant something else than what you posted, then correct what you meant to post...
 
Last edited:
If you're asking me about about property taxes in general, I think it's garbage that you never actually own your property. I think they are garbage too.
You definitely own your property. What you are crying about is that you have to pay property taxes because we need to educate children in your community so that they don't grow up stupid with the only option of acquiring wealth is to come to your property, kill you, and take it.
 
Yeah, I really think if Pelosi is gone by that point, AOC could be in the running. Dems don’t like to leave things up to the public though. Among the talking heads, the early ones are

Kamala again (bizarre)
Newsome
Shapiro
Gretchen
AOC


I’d be shocked if the nominee wasn’t one of those.
That's a phenomenal list... for the Republicans.
 
Missing the point completely. You can like Catturd opinion all you want but he shouldn’t be a verified member for posting legit news, etc. Whether you like guys like Tapper or Hannity, etc. (I don’t like either), they at least are members of news organizations. Catturd is a dude tweeting from his couch and Musk and Trump retweet him. Thats a problem.

Bigger issue is that you think Tapper and others are the same as Catturd. They’re not. Just because you like Catturd nonsensical posts, doesn’t make him reliable news source.


I’m not missing a point, the point you’re trying to make is just flat out retarded.

Whether someone wears a CNN employment badge, has a blue check, works for Fox News, sits on their couch, etc. you should do an independent evaluation of their credibility and the information they’re providing.

Tapper and Stelter are worse than Catturd, because they actually pretend to be journalists not just shit posters on the internet.
 
No clue. I haven’t gone though all the cases. But anyone that can be proved they beat up cops should be charged. Anyone with a working brain believes that though.

So you don’t actually know if anyone beat up any cops, but want Trump to answer a stupid random hypothetical about people who beat up cops?

If you feel specific people shouldn’t be pardoned, post the names. Otherwise stop asking stupid questions.
 
You definitely own your property. What you are crying about is that you have to pay property taxes because we need to educate children in your community so that they don't grow up stupid with the only option of acquiring wealth is to come to your property, kill you, and take it.


Property taxes funding public schools have done a great job of ensuring children in the communities across America are educated, that’s for sure.
 
Trump and Musk have one similar great talent. They get their opponents to defend the indefensible.


Spending your life protecting and shielding child rapists...something a majority of the media on both sides of the ocean have in common. Jim Acosta is one of the great pieces of sh-t of the era.


 
Hey, brah, this just got really interesting, since the first ones proved to be a bust. Just figured out what the new and brazen marketing campaign will be for the murdna jabs from here forward.

 
So you don’t actually know if anyone beat up any cops, but want Trump to answer a stupid random hypothetical about people who beat up cops?

If you feel specific people shouldn’t be pardoned, post the names. Otherwise stop asking stupid questions.
I don’t know their names but there’s lots of videos of criminals beating up cops that day. Let’s keep it simple. Let’s say it was 26 people so we can call them “Criminal A” through “Criminal Z”. Now I think that criminals A-Z should’ve been charged for beating up police officers. Do you?
 
I’m not missing a point, the point you’re trying to make is just flat out retarded.

Whether someone wears a CNN employment badge, has a blue check, works for Fox News, sits on their couch, etc. you should do an independent evaluation of their credibility and the information they’re providing.

Tapper and Stelter are worse than Catturd, because they actually pretend to be journalists not just shit posters on the internet.
Of course you should do your own evaluation. But that evaluation shouldn’t be “this is legacy media so therefore I won’t listen to them because daddy Trump says they’re out to get me. Let’s see what Catturd has to say about this”.
 
Dirtbag Liberals boo'd Hulk Hogan out of the arena in rat dump Los Angeles last night in the Netflix debut. Pretty much all of the 17K in attendance. None of those losers would even be there if it wasn't for him.
Hate that Hogan loves him some Trump. But I don’t know why people can’t separate the 2 things. He’s a wrestling legend, the best ever. Don’t boo him because he likes Trump. Cheer him for all the great moments he’s given us.

Then again, they might’ve booed him because he’s a trash human who has said many racist things.. lol not sure
 
Missing the point completely. You can like Catturd opinion all you want but he shouldn’t be a verified member for posting legit news, etc. Whether you like guys like Tapper or Hannity, etc. (I don’t like either), they at least are members of news organizations. Catturd is a dude tweeting from his couch and Musk and Trump retweet him. Thats a problem.

Bigger issue is that you think Tapper and others are the same as Catturd. They’re not. Just because you like Catturd nonsensical posts, doesn’t make him reliable news source.
If this is you suggesting that Jake Tapper is a reliable news source, you sir are a moron. He is a Democrat operative. He lies for fun.
 
I don’t know their names but there’s lots of videos of criminals beating up cops that day. Let’s keep it simple. Let’s say it was 26 people so we can call them “Criminal A” through “Criminal Z”. Now I think that criminals A-Z should’ve been charged for beating up police officers. Do you?

If we also assume we live in a world with equal application of the law regardless of political party, and without a corrupt DOJ and judicial system, with no entrapment and no self defense arguments, then I’ll grant the assumption that those deemed criminals should be charged.

Your hypothetical is stupid. You need to evaluate the facts of each case given this corrupt DOJ. That’s implausible given the far sweeping corruption and numbers of political prisoners, I would err on the side of releasing one person who “beat up” a cop over wrongfully imprisoning one person who didn’t for a single additional day.
 
If we also assume we live in a world with equal application of the law regardless of political party, and without a corrupt DOJ and judicial system, with no entrapment and no self defense arguments, then I’ll grant the assumption that those deemed criminals should be charged.

Your hypothetical is stupid. You need to evaluate the facts of each case given this corrupt DOJ. That’s implausible given the far sweeping corruption and numbers of political prisoners, I would err on the side of releasing one person who “beat up” a cop over wrongfully imprisoning one person who didn’t for a single additional day.
Bill take a break.
You have wore him out all afternoon.
He's not gonna get it.
 
Of course you should do your own evaluation. But that evaluation shouldn’t be “this is legacy media so therefore I won’t listen to them because daddy Trump says they’re out to get me. Let’s see what Catturd has to say about this”.

Correct. That would be a stupid evaluation and no one is suggesting you should look at it that way.

Remember, you started the discussion arguing X is now worse because you can’t just trust everything a blue check mark posts now. I’m just pointing out to you how stupid it was to blindly trust people with blue check marks.
 
I don’t know their names but there’s lots of videos of criminals beating up cops that day. Let’s keep it simple. Let’s say it was 26 people so we can call them “Criminal A” through “Criminal Z”. Now I think that criminals A-Z should’ve been charged for beating up police officers. Do you?
Libs claimed that cops were killed.
They were not.
Now cops were beat up.
Haven't seen one video of such.
I have seen multiple videos of cops opening doors for "insurrectionists"
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT