ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Man, thanks for this link. I’m halfway finished. Superb.
I've read a bit of it so far, and I think it is a seriously shitty article. I picked a random sentence ... 61 words. Writers use a run-on sentence either when they cannot fit an idea into straightforward sentences with hyperbolic descriptors that are often unnecessary and distract from the main point of the sentence or article all while creating a false sense of superiority between the extremely verbose author who experiences diarrhea of the fingers and the supposed simpleton reader who must decipher the many directional changes in the stupid-ass run on sentence. I've seen a few of those.
 
I've read a bit of it so far, and I think it is a seriously shitty article. I picked a random sentence ... 61 words. Writers use a run-on sentence either when they cannot fit an idea into straightforward sentences with hyperbolic descriptors that are often unnecessary and distract from the main point of the sentence or article all while creating a false sense of superiority between the extremely verbose author who experiences diarrhea of the fingers and the supposed simpleton reader who must decipher the many directional changes in the stupid-ass run on sentence. I've seen a few of those.
Definitely went the opposite way of how I was taught in journalism. “Don’t use a $10 word when a nickel one will suffice.”
 
** Wise Words Department **

"The internet is not something you just dump something on. It's not a truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material."

—Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Steven (R-AK), explaining the workings of the Internet during a debate on net neutrality
 
Definitely went the opposite way of how I was taught in journalism. “Don’t use a $10 word when a nickel one will suffice.”
The tricky thing is that the Democrat party USED all those weird catch phrases and terminology. He's trying to deconstruct it so it makes sense. I get the point, which is cognitive dissonance doesn't work in the long run. People can only be guilt tripped into voting against their best interests a limited number of times. Eventually people are going to say, "Enough of this, this is stupid." Like Lindy Li.
 
7f08bf443d074fc7d115f31a197338d3.jpg
 
Definitely went the opposite way of how I was taught in journalism. “Don’t use a $10 word when a nickel one will suffice.”
WTF is this sentence supposed to mean:
At the end of the day, Elon Musk may take ketamine all day long while wandering the halls of his own mind in a purple silk caftan.

Let me try:
Elon likes to think a lot.

Yes? NO? :)
 
Well we just shot down our own Hornet from the USS Gettysburg friendly fire.

Thanks Joe Biden. I will refrain with want I want to say. Sad day. He has destroyed this country with Obama
What?!?! Reported where?

I found it. This is outrageous. We're back to the Jimmy Carter military era. DEI...can't wait for Vader and the Emporer to get their pompous asses out of office.
 
He knows that. He doesn’t care
I know, but sometimes the obvious must be stated. There’s something to be said for having to work through the process to legally immigrate to our country. Those folks have an appreciation for coming to our country and want to become Americans, and more importantly, they are vetted.
 
I know, but sometimes the obvious must be stated. There’s something to be said for having to work through the process to legally immigrate to our country. Those folks have an appreciation for coming to our country and want to become Americans, and more importantly, they are vetted.

99% of the 3rd world trash are coming here for the freebies
 
Islam is not a true religion, it's a cult, an evil cult that should be wiped off the face of the Earth.





It's always been nothing but a death cult. And it can not live in an open society cause it is barbaric.

The New York Times and other media write things like this every year at Christmas, Easter, etc. They are too stupid to realize articles like this are an admission of Christianity's supremacy. They will get a few angry letters and emails from this, but most Christians will shrug the shoulders 'ok, believe what you want'.

Now, if they openly questioned Islam in such a way, the writer has put themselves in physical danger, put colleagues in physical danger because Islam was born by violence and death and it always be that way. As CS Lewis wrote "If you had gone to Mohammed and asked, “Are you Allah?” he would first have rent his clothes and then cut your head off." It can not and it will not live peacefully as part of the Western World. The Western World should never have given it an invitation.



GK Chesterton said:

“It is the test of a good religion whether you can joke about it.”​


That 'religion' has zero sense of humor. Humorless f-cks.
 
Last edited:
^^^^^
They will not live peacefully among us...

"There were a RECORD 149 confirmed explosive attacks in Sweden in 2023, the vast majority of which are carried out by immigrant gangs."







Not sure if they still are but for a couple of years Sweden (which didn't have a rape problem before) was per capita the rape capital of Europe. Guess who was doing the raping?
 
Last edited:
WTF is this sentence supposed to mean:
At the end of the day, Elon Musk may take ketamine all day long while wandering the halls of his own mind in a purple silk caftan.

Let me try:
Elon likes to think a lot.

Yes? NO? :)
Jeez man. Stop whining. You don't like the article, we get it. Obviously it's not written for you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
Jeez man. Stop whining. You don't like the article, we get it. Obviously it's not written for you.
I'm not whining at all. I'm pointing out the ridiculousness of the author. Sorry, if it was yours! :)

Even HeismanNole and I were having fun with it.

EDIT: the article was an outlandish exploration of solipsistic ad hominems.

Wait ... are you mooslim? haha.
 
Last edited:
^^^^^
They will not live peacefully among us...

"There were a RECORD 149 confirmed explosive attacks in Sweden in 2023, the vast majority of which are carried out by immigrant gangs."







Not sure if they still are but for a couple of years Sweden (which didn't have a rape problem before) was per capita the rape capital of Europe. Guess who was doing the raping?
I still remember dems defending this by saying.... Sweden counts attempted rapes as rapes... LOL. So if the woman fight off the rape it's a neutral event to dems. smdh.
 
I'm not whining at all. I'm pointing out the ridiculousness of the author. Sorry, if it was yours! :)

Even HeismanNole and I were having fun with it.

EDIT: the article was an outlandish exploration of solipsistic ad hominems.

Wait ... are you mooslim? haha.
And now you take personal shots.

What gave you the redass today? You don't like the article, you said so several times, now you're attacking me for posting it?

"Lost in FL." Makes sense now.
 
And now you take personal shots.

What gave you the redass today? You don't like the article, you said so several times, now you're attacking me for posting it?

"Lost in FL." Makes sense now.
I've been joking about it. We should ask you the same question. What diff does it make if I make fun of an article two times?

EDIT: i never attacked you, but now you're being a dick, maybe I should say Ashole. (haha) Show me where I attacked you please. I didn't know you posted it. I'm just joking about it man. Lighten up dude.
 
Last edited:
I've read a bit of it so far, and I think it is a seriously shitty article. I picked a random sentence ... 61 words. Writers use a run-on sentence either when they cannot fit an idea into straightforward sentences with hyperbolic descriptors that are often unnecessary and distract from the main point of the sentence or article all while creating a false sense of superiority between the extremely verbose author who experiences diarrhea of the fingers and the supposed simpleton reader who must decipher the many directional changes in the stupid-ass run on sentence. I've seen a few of those.

I see what you did there
 
I've been joking about it. We should ask you the same question. What diff does it make if I make fun of an article two times?

EDIT: i never attacked you, but now you're being a dick, maybe I should say Ashole. (haha) Show me where I attacked you please. I didn't know you posted it. I'm just joking about it man. Lighten up dude.
You attacked me twice. You implied I wrote the article and then asked if I was "mooslim." And now you're name calling. You should lighten up. You're the one who got angry over an article just because you couldn't understand a couple of monosyllabic words. (That means more than one syllable)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Caveman Catfan
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT