ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I've read a bit of it so far, and I think it is a seriously shitty article. I picked a random sentence ... 61 words. Writers use a run-on sentence either when they cannot fit an idea into straightforward sentences with hyperbolic descriptors that are often unnecessary and distract from the main point of the sentence or article all while creating a false sense of superiority between the extremely verbose author who experiences diarrhea of the fingers and the supposed simpleton reader who must decipher the many directional changes in the stupid-ass run on sentence. I've seen a few of those.
Whaaaaaaaat? :p ;)
 
The tricky thing is that the Democrat party USED all those weird catch phrases and terminology. He's trying to deconstruct it so it makes sense. I get the point, which is cognitive dissonance doesn't work in the long run. People can only be guilt tripped into voting against their best interests a limited number of times. Eventually people are going to say, "Enough of this, this is stupid." Like Lindy Li.
Well, that cleared it up. Thanks.🥹;)
 
7f08bf443d074fc7d115f31a197338d3.jpg
Number 4
 
So the illegals wont assimilate and choose not to? That’s fear mongering. The illegals will probably be deported and the legal immigrants will transition just fine in their community.
Legal=high probability of good intentions.
Illegal= high probability of secondary crimes and straight up mooching from the teet of gubmint freebies. Or, reorganizing into their criminal gangs to terrorize our citizens.
I prefer #1 please.
 
What Kay Granger’s staff did was pretty deplorable, and I’m certainly not condoning their actions, but they saw how the media pretty much failed to challenge Biden’s declining mental faculties and acted accordingly.

Shame on the media, her colleagues in Congress, and yes even her constituents for allowing this fraud to go on for so long.
 
You attacked me twice. You implied I wrote the article and then asked if I was "mooslim." And now you're name calling. You should lighten up. You're the one who got angry over an article just because you couldn't understand a couple of monosyllabic words. (That means more than one syllable)
Lighten up, Francis
 
I'm in a surly mood after the game last night, so factor this:

x^2 +4x +10 (non-factorable won't be accepted, so it will involve an imaginary number, and show your work)

Oh, WITHOUT using the quadratic formula, LOL (or rather, just plugging it into the quadratic formula, longhand so to speak)
 
Last edited:
You attacked me twice. You implied I wrote the article and then asked if I was "mooslim." And now you're name calling. You should lighten up. You're the one who got angry over an article just because you couldn't understand a couple of monosyllabic words. (That means more than one syllable)

Double ouch, hope all is going okay at home.... A little much...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
I'm in a surly mood after the game last night, so factor this:

x^2 +4x +10 (non-factorable won't be accepted, so it will involve an imaginary number, and show your work)

Oh, WITHOUT using the quadratic formula, LOL (or rather, just plugging it into the quadratic formula, longhand so to speak)
Wow, you are red assed.
Hang in there.
 
You attacked me twice. You implied I wrote the article and then asked if I was "mooslim." And now you're name calling. You should lighten up. You're the one who got angry over an article just because you couldn't understand a couple of monosyllabic words. (That means more than one syllable)
Ash, I'm sorry I made you upset. I like our "Lakeland" connection man. Honestly, I didn't realize you posted it and was just poking fun with you when you commented about me not liking it. Was trying to be humorous, looks like some got it and some didn't. I'll try harder.

What is bolded is pretty dam funny, if you meant that as a joke. Anyway, peace brother. Tis the season.
 
Ash, I'm sorry I made you upset. I like our "Lakeland" connection man. Honestly, I didn't realize you posted it and was just poking fun with you when you commented about me not liking it. Was trying to be humorous, looks like some got it and some didn't. I'll try harder.

What is bolded is pretty dam funny, if you meant that as a joke. Anyway, peace brother. Tis the season.

Wimp...

Go ahead and mess-up a good internet fight.. Geez...


A good man though... ;)

(Someone paid me to be nice...)
 
I'm in a surly mood after the game last night, so factor this:

x^2 +4x +10 (non-factorable won't be accepted, so it will involve an imaginary number, and show your work)

Oh, WITHOUT using the quadratic formula, LOL (or rather, just plugging it into the quadratic formula, longhand so to speak)
How's this professor? My guess:
x^2 + 4x + 10 = (x^2 + 4x + 4) + 6 = (x+2)^2 + 6 = (x+2)^2 - 6i
(x+2-sqrt6i) (x+2+sqrt6i)
 
It was a spurious question to begin with. either way, you're completing the square. I was watching a video, and apparently, in some other countries they teach solving these w/o plugging a,b,c into the formula.

It's truly captivating stuff. LOL
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT