40-50 years ago, yes. But they're pretty readily replaced these days. MIL in nursing home had one done at age 81 some 25 years ago & was fine with that hip - but not much else.
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
I wonder if he could still be charged under a new DOJ/FBI……probably not, since it would be a homicide charge wouldn’t DC have to bring the charges?
Not only that , he was grabbed and pushed by at least one bench player for UL
** Wise Words Department **
"If you're a liberal, anything you say is protected. If you're a conservative, anything you say is hateful."
-Laura Schlessinger
"If you're a liberal, anything you say is protected. If you're a conservative, anything you say is hateful."
-Laura Schlessinger
I agree that some of this is just the average dumbmasses wanting in on the act...but, there have been a few to many reports, and a couple of pics of drones flying around the area, to just disregard the whole thing. You have LEO, pilots, and drone experts all reporting sightings.
The war in Ukraine has changed everything where drone tech is concerned. Hell they made "vampire drones" that can hover over power lines to recharge themselves.
The fact that the government has nothing to say means that the drones for sure belong to them. The question is, what are they looking for?
The pics I have seen look like large sniffer drones. So, are they sniffing the airwaves for communications? Is that why the government told people to stop texting so that it would clear up the bandwaves a bit, or are they sniffing for gamma rads because they fear a dirty bomb made it ashore through the less than stellar NJ port security?
Or is it just a big psyop to see how people react? Or is it a "watch what my left hand is doing while my right slaps the taste out of your mouth" kinda thing? It is something. That is for sure.
He was shoved from behind by a u6 player. No intent imho.
The above was my first thought, and I still believe it to be the case.
Of course, I am just speculating; I have no real knowledge (of much of anything, lol).
This is shown to be true time and time again. The people who virtue signal the most don’t even come close to matching the charitable work and donations of conservatives.
They have also always been able to pay more in taxes if they wanted and they don’t but they want you to. It’s how it always is with everything. Migrants can come on over as long as it’s not my neighborhood. BLM, destroy the city and buildings as long as it’s not mine.
Last edited:
i heard this audio of a united airlines pilot over oregon on dec 8 to atc played on a radio show a couple of days ago.
there’s something flying around other than common drones
https://www.newsweek.com/pilots-instructed-maneuver-around-oregon-ufo-alleged-audio-leak-1999176
Is there any military activity out straight ahead of us?" the pilot asked. The controller replied, "1596, no, we're not seeing anything. I had another report at like 30,000 feet in the Eugene area, we're not sure what it is."
The pilot responded: "Yeah, there's lots moving out there."
The pilot continued: "Looking straight west to Eugene. We're seeing 3 or 4 targets... they're at all altitudes, up and down, it's pretty crazy."
The controller replied: "Does it look like it's at your altitude?" The pilots replied: "There was some at 30 [thousand feet] probably, they're shooting way up, we say, even up to the 50s it looked like."
Normal commercial aircraft don't tend to reach 50,000 feet, which is the maximum altitude for an F-22 fighter jet.
Six minutes further into the recording, at 8:46 p.m. PST, another pilot communicates with the controller, identifying himself as MEDEVAC (a medical evacuation aircraft).
"Is there traffic out about our 2 to 3 o'clock, at about, I don't know, 20 or 30 miles?"
The controller replies: "No, is that the four different lights going up and down? I'm getting a few reports. Are you seeing it right in front of you as well?" The pilot continues, "It's 2 to 3 o'clock from our position. Looks about 20 miles, going in circles."
The whole episode with Martha's Vineyard illustrated their bullshit perfectly. Their lack of self-awareness was on full display too when the migrants were bussed out and the crowd was waving and smiling to them as they left.
Nothing says Merry Christmas from Merica quite like a rubber bullet to a woman or toddler's head. Fool.
If they want, they can start with their side first or does this not apply to Soros, Obamas, Clintons, Pelosis, Bidens, Google, Facebook, corporate media, Pfizer and the rest of their idols?
Last edited:
I’ve been seeing a lot of stuff where these drones are ours and they’re scouting for dirty bombs in the Jersey ports.
Think this admin is above martial law?
Think this admin is above martial law?
1) The problems we have right now are because laws on the books haven’t been enforced
2) I don’t want them imprisoned. I want them deported
3) The 4,000 number in the ASYLUM law you want passed is a non-starter. Get rid of that BS and we can talk
Fakebook...
Judas Iscariot was the first leftist.
John 12: 3-7
3 Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment.
4 Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, which should betray him,
5 Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor?
6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein.
7 Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this.
One of the most profound quotes in our history. Schoolchildren should be forced to memorize it.
Found out why these drones aren't spotted in FL.
Been hearing this a lot the last couple of days. Coming from different sources too so it's not just "one side" or "one echo chamber" hearing this.
SHE really cannot. SHE cannot imagine she ate lead paint off her window sill as a regular meal during her childhood and growing up until after her teens... and all her living room window's as well. (It's mind is shot...) (Not with a firearm either..)
I've seen several people repost this video that Rogan posted. This seems to be where all the "experts" are trending to.
I like to sell stuff locally on marketplace, that's about it.... Once I am rid of the stuff from my downsizing I will be an in-frequent visitor as well to FakeBook... (Spell it right next time...) 😅
hahahahaha
Michael Rapaport, former Trump hater and leftist, has gone full based conservative:
www.breitbart.com
Michael Rapaport, former Trump hater and leftist, has gone full based conservative:
Michael Rapaport Offers Free Plane Trip to West Bank for Ousted 'Squad' Members Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman
Hollywood actor and staunch Israel supporter Michael Rapaport put outgoing Democrat Jamaal Bowman on blast for calling out "Free Palestine" during his final speech as a congressman and offered Bowman and other "squad members" a free trip to the West Bank so they can enjoy the heat of the...
www.breitbart.com
It's a dam good thing we've allowed millions of fighting age foreign nationals into our country the past 4 years. Thanks Joe and the Ho.
and again nothing will be brought to bear on the criminals. maddening
Masterful explanation of the "rape" accusation against Trump by Byron York, and why George Steph trapped himself (and why idiots like Sammy still do). It was Judge Kaplan who made the mistake. And ABC News paid the price.
As you can see from discussion of the Trump-Stephanopoulos defamation settlement, Judge Lewis Kaplan's post-verdict effort to redefine the result of the E. Jean Carroll case has proven extremely valuable to Trump adversaries who claim that Trump is a "rapist." The jury specifically found that Carroll did *not* prove that Trump raped her, even by the low standards in effect at the trial. You can look at the verdict form -- the jurors checked "No" on the rape question. Instead, the jury found that Trump "sexually abused" Carroll. You'd think that would be enough for Resistance types; they can accurately say that Trump was found liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll. But no -- they want to call it rape.
That's where Judge Kaplan came in. When Trump's lawyers asked for a new trial, Kaplan denied the motion and used the occasion to express his opinion that the jury had, in fact, found Trump liable for rape. To make his case, Kaplan had to cast far and wide for definitions of rape that fit his purposes. He argued that the jury had "implicitly" found that Trump raped Carroll if one judges the question by: 1) the definition of rape in http://Dictionary.com; 2) the definition of rape in the Uniform Code of Military Justice; 3) the definition of rape accepted by the American Psychological Association; and 4) the definition of rape used in federal crime reporting statistics. Unfortunately for Kaplan, none of those standards was in effect in New York law, under which the case was brought and tried.
Nevertheless, Kaplan concluded that, "The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape.' Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump did exactly that.
"For Resistance warriors, and their allies in the media, that was the money quote. See? Trump raped E. Jean Carroll! Judge Kaplan says http://Dictionary.com says so!
It was a stunning declaration. When the verdict form asked "Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll?" the jury answered "No." How can one be clearer than that? And the jury reached its conclusion by following Judge Kaplan's own instructions. And then, after the verdict, the judge tried to upend the whole thing.
By the way, Kaplan's statement did not receive a huge amount of media attention. But a short time later, a quasi-opinion writer at the Washington Post published an "analysis" with the headline "Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll." And that was enough for the anti-Trump world. Look around today, and almost all of them cite the Post article as proof that Trump raped Carroll.
One of the believers, apparently, was ABC's George Stephanopoulos. And now that ABC and Stephanopoulos have settled a defamation suit by agreeing to give $15 million to a future Trump Presidential Library, plus pay $1 million of Trump's legal costs, you're seeing a lot of anti-Trump types claim that Stephanopoulos was right when he repeatedly said on ABC that Trump had been found liable for raping Carroll. Just look at what Judge Kaplan said and read the Washington Post article, they argue.
But the facts remain the facts. The jury, acting on Judge Kaplan's instructions, specifically found that Carroll had not proven Trump raped her. The jury decided the case. Whatever Kaplan said in a motion afterward does not change the jury's verdict. Still, the judge did a great favor to Resistance world by lending his name and authority to one of the anti-Trump left's favorite talking points.
As you can see from discussion of the Trump-Stephanopoulos defamation settlement, Judge Lewis Kaplan's post-verdict effort to redefine the result of the E. Jean Carroll case has proven extremely valuable to Trump adversaries who claim that Trump is a "rapist." The jury specifically found that Carroll did *not* prove that Trump raped her, even by the low standards in effect at the trial. You can look at the verdict form -- the jurors checked "No" on the rape question. Instead, the jury found that Trump "sexually abused" Carroll. You'd think that would be enough for Resistance types; they can accurately say that Trump was found liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll. But no -- they want to call it rape.
That's where Judge Kaplan came in. When Trump's lawyers asked for a new trial, Kaplan denied the motion and used the occasion to express his opinion that the jury had, in fact, found Trump liable for rape. To make his case, Kaplan had to cast far and wide for definitions of rape that fit his purposes. He argued that the jury had "implicitly" found that Trump raped Carroll if one judges the question by: 1) the definition of rape in http://Dictionary.com; 2) the definition of rape in the Uniform Code of Military Justice; 3) the definition of rape accepted by the American Psychological Association; and 4) the definition of rape used in federal crime reporting statistics. Unfortunately for Kaplan, none of those standards was in effect in New York law, under which the case was brought and tried.
Nevertheless, Kaplan concluded that, "The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape.' Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump did exactly that.
"For Resistance warriors, and their allies in the media, that was the money quote. See? Trump raped E. Jean Carroll! Judge Kaplan says http://Dictionary.com says so!
It was a stunning declaration. When the verdict form asked "Did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll?" the jury answered "No." How can one be clearer than that? And the jury reached its conclusion by following Judge Kaplan's own instructions. And then, after the verdict, the judge tried to upend the whole thing.
By the way, Kaplan's statement did not receive a huge amount of media attention. But a short time later, a quasi-opinion writer at the Washington Post published an "analysis" with the headline "Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll." And that was enough for the anti-Trump world. Look around today, and almost all of them cite the Post article as proof that Trump raped Carroll.
One of the believers, apparently, was ABC's George Stephanopoulos. And now that ABC and Stephanopoulos have settled a defamation suit by agreeing to give $15 million to a future Trump Presidential Library, plus pay $1 million of Trump's legal costs, you're seeing a lot of anti-Trump types claim that Stephanopoulos was right when he repeatedly said on ABC that Trump had been found liable for raping Carroll. Just look at what Judge Kaplan said and read the Washington Post article, they argue.
But the facts remain the facts. The jury, acting on Judge Kaplan's instructions, specifically found that Carroll had not proven Trump raped her. The jury decided the case. Whatever Kaplan said in a motion afterward does not change the jury's verdict. Still, the judge did a great favor to Resistance world by lending his name and authority to one of the anti-Trump left's favorite talking points.
What the hell did Aliens do to be compared to Rosie O Donnell?
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy point to DOGE targets
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) co-leads Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have not been shy about about what they plan to target as their agency guides cut under Trump 2.0.
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy point to DOGE targets
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) co-leads Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have not been shy about about what they plan to target as their agency guides cut under Trump 2.0.www.foxbusiness.com
I'd still retire and work for them for free.
I think if enough of them think there’s a decent chance they’re going to jail when Trump takes office, then nothing is off the table.
Similar threads
