ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
W O W
State Forecasting Accuracy by Organization, Battleground States Only.
Atlas Intel 100%
PollFair 86%
Rasmussen 86%
Trafalgar 71%
Insider Advantage 71%
Real Clear Politics 71%
Fabrizio 67%
Remington 67%
Emerson 57%
Wall Street Journal 50%
Beacon (Fox) 50%
Marist 50%
Morning Consult50%
Suffolk50%
TIPP 43%
538 43%
Quinnipiac 40%
Susquehanna 33%
CNN 33%
Bloomberg 33%
GSG 33%
Echelon 33%
Washington Post 33%
Data for Progress 25%
CBS 25%
Siena 14%
Cook 14%
Only 9 of 27 got more than 50% of the states correct. A majority of "professional pollsters" could NOT get more than 50% of the states accurately.
I knew Trump was a winner two days before the election when my left leaning nephew told me he was gonna vote for Trump because he listened to him on Rogan and Kamala wouldn't go on there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukalum1988
Let this be a lesson for future Republican campaigns. Stand up for the truth. Highlight, fight, mock the depravity in their ranks. And everyday people will respond. Trump and his team gave zero sh-ts about offending that crowd.



"For years, many conservatives were terrified to touch the trans issue. It was on pace to be socially and politically accepted — a hate crime to even question it.

Matt courageously and effectively set out on a one-man mission to expose the Trans mafia at great personal risk to himself and his family. His film “What is a Woman?” is a masterpiece.

Polling suggests that Kamala's support for radical transgender policies was the single most-important issue for swing voters who picked Donald Trump, narrowly beating out even the economy and the border.

"Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you" deserves to go down as one of the all-time great closing pitches in American history."





 
I was disappointed with the Presidential election in one respect- I wanted at least one blue state. A REAL blue state. Minnesota, New Jersey, etc. The closest was Nevada, but he kicked her ass there and nearly won Vegas. I love it when we win the cities. I am from a city and a big one. We smoked Miami, you liberals.
 
If worst comes to worst, the Republicans have the Presidency, 53 Senate seats, and probably 220 House seats minimum. Sam will be bawling either way. Dion will be raging either way. It's all good either way.
Agree but I’m greedy. I want their heads to explode when shes sitting in the chamber. 🤣
 
What are you new?!?!

He was the slay queen when it came to drag queen story hour. He also saw NO PROBLEMO with the pride parades and other public displays of lewd behavior in front of children. But he was the staunchest of staunch supports of DQSH.

I guess that's news to me. When I think of him, it's just miles and miles of pedantic bad law.
 
W O W
State Forecasting Accuracy by Organization, Battleground States Only.
Atlas Intel 100%
PollFair 86%
Rasmussen 86%
Trafalgar 71%
Insider Advantage 71%
Real Clear Politics 71%
Fabrizio 67%
Remington 67%
Emerson 57%
Wall Street Journal 50%
Beacon (Fox) 50%
Marist 50%
Morning Consult50%
Suffolk50%
TIPP 43%
538 43%
Quinnipiac 40%
Susquehanna 33%
CNN 33%
Bloomberg 33%
GSG 33%
Echelon 33%
Washington Post 33%
Data for Progress 25%
CBS 25%
Siena 14%
Cook 14%
Only 9 of 27 got more than 50% of the states correct. A majority of "professional pollsters" could NOT get more than 50% of the states accurately.
Honestly, I felt like this thread was more accurate than most of these .
 
Plans include relocating the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters from Washington. haha

Spokeswoman for the Trump transition team, Karoline Leavitt: “[The results of Tuesday’s election] gave him a mandate to implement the promises he made on the campaign trail. He will deliver.”












First order in getting this done and many other things, is getting these people out of the government:


He said this before when he was in the first time, but he needs to do it: move some of these agencies away from DC, or just gut them. It’s time to get rid of the artificial voting bloc of NOVA.
 
FYI...
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd59a539e-3546-4526-9599-dbdbeba101f2_565x415.png
The only way that state saves itself though, is to control the legislature and outlaw ballot harvesting. The root of California’s ills coincide with it.

By now, half of California must be illegal immigrated anyway.
 
Time to move on
Yeah… no. There is a gold mine of investigative reporting and analysis that should be done on this subject. The anomalies surrounding the 2020 election figures are off the charts unusual. It’s was really quite apparent even before last week, but the comparative data available now is shockingly different than 2020.
 
The "jd vance is weird" was intentional to steal the word weird bc they knew what ppl would think of this batshit family once ppl saw them

Vance is not weird by any definition. I have no idea why idea the Left started using that stupid word, which is almost obsolete, except that it's very frequently used as slang in the inner city to describe a snitch. It's also used as a generic negative insult in the city. If you're a total loser, the word that will be used is "weird".
 
What about their rights? Unconstitutional means it's violating them. But yet you support it, even though you think it's unconstitutional. Fascist twat.
Ah, name calling. The white flag of the beaten. Im not familiar with Israels constitution but someone complicit in violence and terrorism like they have in Israel should be deported. Im sorry that gets your panties in a bunch but ignoring a direct threat is both foolish and ignorant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Vance is not weird by any definition. I have no idea why idea the Left started using that stupid word, which is almost obsolete, except that it's very frequently used as slang in the inner city to describe a snitch. It's also used as a generic negative insult.
I am having withdrawals from not seeing him eviscerate their moronic arguments. Fire up some talk shows, losers.
 
Vance is not weird by any definition. I have no idea why idea the Left started using that stupid word, which is almost obsolete, except that it's very frequently used as slang in the inner city to describe a snitch. It's also used as a generic negative insult in the city. If you're a total loser, the word that will be used is "weird".

Because Walz was actually the weird one.
 
The "jd vance is weird" was intentional to steal the word weird bc they knew what ppl would think of this batshit family once ppl saw them


You know why it's hard for a woman to get elected President? Because I believe that in order for them to reach the level in American politics, where they're finally considered, they think they have to become so over-bearingly obnoxious/tough, that most folks end up despising them.

They all come across as having "little man's syndrome" It's nothing but their interpretation of what they think "toughness" looks like.

Genuine toughness manifests itself differently in women than it does in men. When women try and do "masculine tough" it just comes across as annoying and shrill. There is nothing genuine about it.

It's not misogyny.
 
Last edited:
You know why it's hard for a woman to get elected President? Because I believe that in order for them to reach the level in American politics, where they're finally considered, they have to become so over-bearingly obnoxious, that most folks can't stomach them.

They all come across as having "little man's syndrome" It's nothing but their interpretation of what they think "toughness" looks like.

Genuine toughness in women manifests is differently than it does in men. When women try and do "masculine tough" it just comes across as annoying and shrill. There is nothing genuine about it.
It's not just that, although that is a strong component, they are selecting candidates that are just plain and simple terrible candidates. They should not blame it on color, sex or whatever, but on likability and policy. They shouldn't, but I'm happy that is all they see.
 
It's not just that, although that is a strong component, they are selecting candidates that are just plain and simple terrible candidates. They should not blame it on color, sex or whatever, but on likability and policy. They shouldn't, but I'm happy that is all they see.
Well, you and I agree essentially. Because I think that that personality "hitch" is part of why they're terrible. In Kamala's case though, I think it has as much to do with her intellect deficit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
You know why it's hard for a woman to get elected President? Because I believe that in order for them to reach the level in American politics, where they're finally considered, they think they have to become so over-bearingly obnoxious/tough, that most folks end up despising them.

They all come across as having "little man's syndrome" It's nothing but their interpretation of what they think "toughness" looks like.

Genuine toughness in women manifests itself differently in women than it does in men. When women try and do "masculine tough" it just comes across as annoying and shrill. There is nothing genuine about it.

It's not misogyny.
Maggie pulled it off well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT