ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
FYI...
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd59a539e-3546-4526-9599-dbdbeba101f2_565x415.png
The only way that state saves itself though, is to control the legislature and outlaw ballot harvesting. The root of California’s ills coincide with it.

By now, half of California must be illegal immigrated anyway.
 
Time to move on
Yeah… no. There is a gold mine of investigative reporting and analysis that should be done on this subject. The anomalies surrounding the 2020 election figures are off the charts unusual. It’s was really quite apparent even before last week, but the comparative data available now is shockingly different than 2020.
 
The "jd vance is weird" was intentional to steal the word weird bc they knew what ppl would think of this batshit family once ppl saw them

Vance is not weird by any definition. I have no idea why idea the Left started using that stupid word, which is almost obsolete, except that it's very frequently used as slang in the inner city to describe a snitch. It's also used as a generic negative insult in the city. If you're a total loser, the word that will be used is "weird".
 
What about their rights? Unconstitutional means it's violating them. But yet you support it, even though you think it's unconstitutional. Fascist twat.
Ah, name calling. The white flag of the beaten. Im not familiar with Israels constitution but someone complicit in violence and terrorism like they have in Israel should be deported. Im sorry that gets your panties in a bunch but ignoring a direct threat is both foolish and ignorant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Vance is not weird by any definition. I have no idea why idea the Left started using that stupid word, which is almost obsolete, except that it's very frequently used as slang in the inner city to describe a snitch. It's also used as a generic negative insult.
I am having withdrawals from not seeing him eviscerate their moronic arguments. Fire up some talk shows, losers.
 
Vance is not weird by any definition. I have no idea why idea the Left started using that stupid word, which is almost obsolete, except that it's very frequently used as slang in the inner city to describe a snitch. It's also used as a generic negative insult in the city. If you're a total loser, the word that will be used is "weird".

Because Walz was actually the weird one.
 
The "jd vance is weird" was intentional to steal the word weird bc they knew what ppl would think of this batshit family once ppl saw them


You know why it's hard for a woman to get elected President? Because I believe that in order for them to reach the level in American politics, where they're finally considered, they think they have to become so over-bearingly obnoxious/tough, that most folks end up despising them.

They all come across as having "little man's syndrome" It's nothing but their interpretation of what they think "toughness" looks like.

Genuine toughness manifests itself differently in women than it does in men. When women try and do "masculine tough" it just comes across as annoying and shrill. There is nothing genuine about it.

It's not misogyny.
 
Last edited:
You know why it's hard for a woman to get elected President? Because I believe that in order for them to reach the level in American politics, where they're finally considered, they have to become so over-bearingly obnoxious, that most folks can't stomach them.

They all come across as having "little man's syndrome" It's nothing but their interpretation of what they think "toughness" looks like.

Genuine toughness in women manifests is differently than it does in men. When women try and do "masculine tough" it just comes across as annoying and shrill. There is nothing genuine about it.
It's not just that, although that is a strong component, they are selecting candidates that are just plain and simple terrible candidates. They should not blame it on color, sex or whatever, but on likability and policy. They shouldn't, but I'm happy that is all they see.
 
It's not just that, although that is a strong component, they are selecting candidates that are just plain and simple terrible candidates. They should not blame it on color, sex or whatever, but on likability and policy. They shouldn't, but I'm happy that is all they see.
Well, you and I agree essentially. Because I think that that personality "hitch" is part of why they're terrible. In Kamala's case though, I think it has as much to do with her intellect deficit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
You know why it's hard for a woman to get elected President? Because I believe that in order for them to reach the level in American politics, where they're finally considered, they think they have to become so over-bearingly obnoxious/tough, that most folks end up despising them.

They all come across as having "little man's syndrome" It's nothing but their interpretation of what they think "toughness" looks like.

Genuine toughness in women manifests itself differently in women than it does in men. When women try and do "masculine tough" it just comes across as annoying and shrill. There is nothing genuine about it.

It's not misogyny.
Maggie pulled it off well.
 
If you are going to hurl insults and pursue name-calling, I would advise you to use something stronger than 'crybully hypocrite' and 'fascist twat' 😂😂
Exactly, my posts are extremely tame compared to the average here. Yet I get singled out as uncouth? It's laughable. Thanks for reinforcing my point.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Phil_The_Music
I knew Trump was a winner two days before the election when my left leaning nephew told me he was gonna vote for Trump because he listened to him on Rogan and Kamala wouldn't go on there.

Oh. MY. GOD.

SCIENCE DUDE!

SCIENCE, TRUTH, FACTS, DATA, right?

The fact that you, of all people posted this, shows the true levels of the depths of your stupidity. It's bottomless.
 
The Ray Epps crap has all been debunked.
The video you are referring to where the cops were not fighting with those coming into the Capitol occured only after the mob had already breached it by so many hundreds that the cops gave up at that point because they were so completely outnumbered. 🤣
You are utterly clueless. Epps was not debunked in any way. You were lied to. There is video of the police coming to protesters and telling them they are going to open the doors to allow them in. The guy with the bullhorn was announcing it and the cops completely accommodated it. The bulk of the problems that day were instigated or carried out by feds and antifa.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT