POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Multiple Meat Heads???? Wow... Who'd a thunk it...
When You Know It Was an Ass-Whoopin’… NY Times Headline Following Debate: “Vance’s Dominant Debate Performance Shows Why He’s Trump’s Running Mate”
Not sure if true but some say that judge had something to do with the guy's daughter. Again, just some reading I ran across. If so, it does shed some light on why this happened.
IF the rumors are true that the judge raped his daughter, I don't blame him at all. I'd be going to prison as well if I were in his position.
Election results likely to be delayed nationwide by state rules, litigation, and investigations
Since election results could be “delayed because of a rules change, you’ve just created a dynamic where either side can claim the election has been stolen,” Jason Snead said.
justthenews.com
Love it when Democrats get their asses kicked and MSM acknowledges as much.
Fortunately, Vance has the receipts...
University of New Mexico dealt legal blow after charging 'hefty' fee against conservative speaker: 'Major win'
A law firm touted victory after a court ruled against the University of New Mexico over the college's past attempt to charge a large fee when activist Riley Gaines was billed to speak on campus.
In general I agree with your comment although I don't think the 'dance' was pathetic, just wishy washy. JD did not push hard enough on MN law as you stated and could have scored a few more points if he had. What both Trump and JD are missing, imo, is the 'gotcha' on abortion. I would have loved to see JD say, 'VP Harris and Gov Walz constantly talk about a woman's rights and healthcare when talking about abortion. What about the baby's rights and healthcare? When does the baby begin to have rights? In MN, CA, CO (and maybe others I don't know), the baby has NO rights until after birth. Yet, in every one of those states, an unborn fetus whose pregnant mother is murdered can be considered as a SECOND life when charging the murderer. And, each one of those states define when that fetus is considered a second life differently just like each state can have its own abortion laws. How can your state, Gov Walz, and others say that it's OK for a mother to kill her unborn child in the 30th or 35th week but a murderer can be convicted of killing that same unborn child in week 22?' Most people who are adamant about preserving abortion rights have never thought about this side of the issue. Some may say, 'It's totally different'. To which JD (or I) would reply, 'Not to the baby'. To me as a logically thinking individual, it makes zero sense that a state would define a fetus as a 2nd life when murdered but not a life at all when being aborted. If more people would actually consider this inconsistency, I believe there could be a reasonable limit set on unrestricted abortions. Politically, a huge majority are against late term abortions. Capitalize on that overwhelming majority's opinion and nail Harris/Walz down on when, exactly, the definition of 'late term' should begin?
Libs lose their GD minds when her name is mentioned. Keep up the good fight, Riley!University of New Mexico dealt legal blow after charging 'hefty' fee against conservative speaker: 'Major win'
A law firm touted victory after a court ruled against the University of New Mexico over the college's past attempt to charge a large fee when activist Riley Gaines was billed to speak on campus.www.foxnews.com
Bring out all the vote totals you want & all the instances of election fraud you dearly believe to your core, & they still don't add up to Biden not having won. I'll wait for on the emojis of various kinds.
Trump has earned the right to be digged over & over, Vance or no Vance.
Exposing the government & equating that as to why Trump lost when he was government at the time is bs.
Only thing they hate more than conservatives is when a woman or a minority goes off the plantation and speaks for themselves.
Surprised Joe even realizes where he's at these days.
Thousands of murders and rapists allowed to enter America.
Jim Acosta: Say Kamala's name right
Jim Acosta: Say Kamala's name right
No one ever said Drumpf.
This is why they want Elon arrested in foreign countries and why they hate him here. It's platform millions use for free speech and they don't have control over it.
And he mocks them daily on it:
And he mocks them daily on it:
I completely agree with and share your moral position.
The unfortunate fact is that political position is devastating for the gop and thats exactly the response the moderators were trying to elicit.
Its horrible i know, but to draw any harder line than the current one is to guarantee elections will be lost and an even more sinister abortion law will be in place across the land.
Its awful to think a generation of unborn must be sacrificed to save more in the future; but that really is the only long game answer.
It's tricky for sure. It just seems like an area where repubs are just going to have to concede a bit. I know that will outrage many here, but like you said, elections will be lost if this gets pushed any further, and then it could get real bad.
Just makes me think "Give this one to them". Because if for nothing else, there's just too much emotion in Abortion and I can't see a day where anything less 60% of the nation are pro-abortion. It's a losing battle.
So you believe Walter got the most votes in Presidential history legitimately?
The rest of your opinions are starting to come into focus for me.
Lolololol just days ago they were saying he was "redefining masculinity" now today they're going to tell you how MeToo isn't real
Heh, another wife-beater special. Dems just getting their asses kicked all over the place today.
These people are insufferable.
Lex Friedman introduced Vivek (vivake) on his podcast ad “Viveck” and he didn’t even correct him.
Sic Corn-Pop on her...
Kamala ran as a tough-on-crime prosecutor originally. All the “left wing” stuff came from the 2020 primary when she was trying to find a lane between Bernie and Joe. She wouldn’t’ve held those positions a few months later in the general had she won, let alone years later now that she’s the candidate. I would love her to be “left wing” but she isn’t. Look at her positions on Israel, not even lip service offered to the left.
That's interesting. You believe that, let's say, a policy plank touting a 23 week ban on abortion with the obvious exceptions, would still be too draconian and would not cause enough votes to swing to Republican? Yet, poll after poll show a huge majority are against late term abortions. In my opinion, there are plenty of voters who are 100% against a total ban (or a very short time period like FL's 6 weeks) AND late term. Right now, they feel they have to vote D as the R's aren't giving them much to work with and this issue is very important. Match the state's abortion ban with the murder statute and I believe, for a chunk of voters, this would take abortion as THE deciding issue off the table and those voters would then look to immigration, the economy, crime, foreign policy, etc. as determinants of their vote where, I believe, the R's have a lot more going for them than do the D's.
Yes, there are zealots on both sides that will NEVER vote 'for' abortion and others who wouldn't support any restriction on it, but they're not going to change their mind regardless. I believe, and I'm certain I could be way off here, that there is a sizable number of voters who are so concerned about a total ban that they feel the only choice is Harris/Walz even if they promote unlimited abortion rights. Marrying the abortion limitations to the murder statute is defensible, logical, and, my guess, many states have set that time limit around the 20-24 week mark which, politically, is reasonable, imo.
So, it's interesting to me that you believe going further than Vance did last night would be a bad move politically. You may be right. But, it sure doesn't make logical sense to me.
Yes, there are zealots on both sides that will NEVER vote 'for' abortion and others who wouldn't support any restriction on it, but they're not going to change their mind regardless. I believe, and I'm certain I could be way off here, that there is a sizable number of voters who are so concerned about a total ban that they feel the only choice is Harris/Walz even if they promote unlimited abortion rights. Marrying the abortion limitations to the murder statute is defensible, logical, and, my guess, many states have set that time limit around the 20-24 week mark which, politically, is reasonable, imo.
So, it's interesting to me that you believe going further than Vance did last night would be a bad move politically. You may be right. But, it sure doesn't make logical sense to me.
I just realized who walz reminds me of. Don Rickles.
You just pissed on Rickles grave...
No other president in the entire history of our country made up fake electors for his VP to unilaterally recognize in an attempt to seize power after losing an election. You keep ignoring that fact. Trump is a unique evil.
I think that is a drop to make him seem more masculine.
That is one closeted fig. No one knows who he is. They can define him anyway they want.
After four years, he’s finally talking. They have to counter what you see and hear. Once you have seen the guy questioned by reporters, his speech and mannerisms say he’s soft.
Doesn’t he live in cali without Kammy?
At the very most it was a bitch slap.
Similar threads
