ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I would be fine with a split of the country. We really are two different ideologies living in the same house. Time for a national divorce imo.
I wouldn't oppose either. However it wouldn't suit the libs. A giant chunk of their psychology centers around forcing others to do what they want.

Thats why covid was one giant orgasmic experience for them.
 
Ah yes, the ole if the race tightens or Harris takes a lead, then the fix is in routine. You all are actually going to rehash this same fantasy from 2020 after many here admitted that the party needed to move on from Trump after the last election?

Alright...this thread might not be an entertaining read after all if we're just getting the same excuses from four years ago. At least get a little creative with the excuses.
Take it easy on them, that's all they have to hang on to. After this election cycle they'll likely move on and begin running normal, boring Republican candidates again.

Enjoy Trump's child-like tantrums and silly name calling for now. Laughing is a good stress reliever.
 
You should totally kill it instead. Much better. Of course it either never happens or happens so rarely it amounts to never.

You can still kill babies in many states. So in the event this scenario were to actually happen, libs can still get them to whatever state to be killed.

You know...for the child's benefit.
Guaranteed if it was you getting raw dogged in an alley your azz wouldn't be carrying that baby and whistling zippidy doo da for a chance to be the mama of your rapist baby daddy.
Hypocrite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKdondee
I agree man. They installed another puppet and let her make her own pick because they "got dis". If they win this time, they'll be states that don't want to be a part of America.
Sore LOSERS. With the emphasis on Losers.
Put forward some candidates that don't incite riots, commit felonies, assault women and threaten to get their VP strung up on a tree for not trashing the Constitution and you may be surprised by the outcome.
 
Free school lunch for kids is supposed to be a bad thing? Investing in public housing? I knew Conservatives were relatively selfish people, but come on, man.
Sorry I'm a freedom loving M'fer. Live and let live is my motto NOT live as the government tells you to. I'll take the few warts that capitalism has over the giant legions of communism.
 
It's a telvised campaign speech to discuss things media never will. Should Trump just hide in a basement like Biden did? Republicans do not have the luxury of someone being their mouthpiece like Democrats do where you don't even have to give a speech or a debate to all of a sudden become "the most popular candidate ever."

He should probably stay away from anything where she can play victim and simply just play audio clips and video clips of everything they have said. But I don't know what else you want him to do? I certainly wouldn't give the Democrat Media access to me, if I were him.
You act like the only alternative to the love-ins is the basement.

He should go factories - outside auto plants, black businesses, Nevada casinos, colleges, fracking sites. Places where he can gain votes. I thought the Harlem visit was great.

Not all those rallies get extensive TV coverage. Where's he been the last week?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeismaNole
What's your issue with kids getting free lunch?
I think your bate is trying to get me to agree that free lunches, social security, etc. are a good thing and then trying to give me a lecture that those items are a form of socialism. There's a difference in having social nets for the very poor and afflicted in a society and having full blown communism. IMO you're very ignorant to the ravages of communism. Study history a little bit concerning those governments and the millions that have died under those dictators but then again your more than likely a troll trying to get a rise out of me but oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
I would be fine with a split of the country. We really are two different ideologies living in the same house. Time for a national divorce imo.
I'm absolutely for this. There's no shared values or goals. We shouldn't have to have everything depend on an election to avoid chaos. Either decide to peacefully separate so each group can live how they want or decide to fight each other and be done because this has grown old.

Of course, globalists have no interest in you having any type of soverignty. They want total control of the west.
 
I think your bate is trying to get me to agree that free lunches, social security, etc. are a good thing and then trying to give me a lecture that those items are a form of socialism. There's a difference in having social nets for the very poor and afflicted in a society and having full blown communism. IMO you're very ignorant to the ravages of communism. Study history a little bit concerning those governments and the millions that have died under those dictators but then again your more than likely a troll trying to get a rise out of me but oh well.
Where's the communism?
 
Guaranteed if it was you getting raw dogged in an alley your azz wouldn't be carrying that baby and whistling zippidy doo da for a chance to be the mama of your rapist baby daddy.
Hypocrite.

If i chose not to, id go to a state that allowed me to murder the innocent child without the desire to force that upon others. Both of which are still allowed and will be even if trump wins.

So sounds like your hot button issue is safe and can stay home.
 
And to think....how many times you order something online you're asked to validate your address? I know our address is known as just the street name. No St., Street, Ave, Avenue, etc. But many times when ordering I can't finish the order until I 'click' on the address with 'St' in order to get my stuff.

Great post. Exactly why they fight tooth and nail to prevent a voter roll audit.

Wonder how many of those are fake people that dont exist? 75% at least?
 
454396242_1060368428983325_3941890018809619616_n.jpg
This reminds me of going to a church with a friend about 20-25 years ago. Was a United Medthodist church in a small town suburb that was probably 90+% white. Just happened to be MLK weekend (I didn't pay any attention to what weekend it was.) Rather than having a regular service with a sermon....after the singing (no choir, just a rock n' roll band playing some kind of semi-Christian music...if you want to call it that), they sat about 5 chairs on the stage in a semi-circle. For the next half hour or so it was a round table discussion by the pastor, and others of how the church wasn't diversified enough, didn't have enough black members/attendees, the town didn't have enough blacks, etc. One of those in the round table was a real estate gal who talked about how she was trying to 'diversify' the community/city. Tried recruiting blacks to buy houses she had listed and so forth.

Needless to say....I have not been back since.
 
I would be fine with a split of the country. We really are two different ideologies living in the same house. Time for a national divorce imo.
And how would that work exactly? What logistics do you have in mind when almost every city is liberal and rural area conservative.
 
I don't think you'd want a split. Blue states keep red states afloat.
I've thought a little about it. In red states, their metropolitan areas are blue. Deep blue. Even in Texas where every major city went Biden last time. I think Dallas went 2-1 for Biden. And Austin went more. Houston went Biden. Ft. Worth. San Antonio. They don't want to be cut off. It's like here where Louisville and Lexington subsidize the poor counties.

But imagine it happens. Texas has a choice. If it goes with the poorer red states, they will have to play sow to those poorer suckling pigs. If the new RedWorld constitution has a Senate, where dirt gets the vote, the Dakotas etc will push Texas around. And the old Dixie states are beyond Poor Relations. So, Texas would have to play a combination of California+New York+New England to subsidize the poor.
 
I think the fix is in. If Dems really were concerned about winning the election they would have chosen Shapiro but they know they're gonna rig it and the VP pick was of no consequence so they go for the socialist no name candidate that brings no value to the table. Nevertheless, I'll vote to say that I done my part to keep us from being a 1980's USSR Baltic state. If you want to know what Americas future looks like look at those areas that communism held captive for decades. Nothing but poverty and despair.
How can you say Shapiro would be the better candidate on the day the PA SC took up the stabbing case he’s associated with? Completely clueless.
 
That's a good question.
Think I'd rather have a moderate national policy at the end of the day.
Those who are completely opposed to abortion NEVER have to have an abortion. They will never be forced to have one by law anyway.
Those who need one for healthcare reasons shouldn't have to worry about it.
Those who are the victims of rape or incest shouldn't have to be made into an unwilling victim of the state too. It's cruel imo.
Those who chose to have one will have to live with that on their soul. Shouldn't include late term abortion.
Make a law that is reasonably early in the pregnancy and has exceptions. 90 percent of Americans would probably be ok with that.

You have two choices right now:

1. Leave it to the state
2. Blanket federal policy signed into law by an president who chose a VP that is OK with allowing babies to die after being born

That’s not a hypothetical. That’s the actual choice.

Leaving it to the 50 states, where people are free to move as they so choose is a much better policy than a blanket federal policy, regardless of what the policy says.

The federal government should have less power, not ultimate say on policy that normalizes killing babies.

The risk that lunatics will set an extreme left wing abortion policy for the country is far too large to cede that power to a large central government. It should stay with the states. MN can kill babies. KY can protect life.
 
I think your bate is trying to get me to agree that free lunches, social security, etc. are a good thing and then trying to give me a lecture that those items are a form of socialism. There's a difference in having social nets for the very poor and afflicted in a society and having full blown communism. IMO you're very ignorant to the ravages of communism. Study history a little bit concerning those governments and the millions that have died under those dictators but then again you’re more than likely a troll trying to get a rise out of me but oh well.
History has had many brutal dictators. Almost none of them ‘communist’. Was Leopold II communist? Or Caligula, Genghis Khan, or Hitler? American propaganda has done a number on you, my friend. Dictatorship, tyranny, and authoritarianism come in all shapes, sizes, and flavors. America today is and always has been much closer to fascism than communism.
 
I've thought a little about it. In red states, their metropolitan areas are blue. Deep blue. Even in Texas where every major city went Biden last time. I think Dallas went 2-1 for Biden. And Austin went more. Houston went Biden. Ft. Worth. San Antonio. They don't want to be cut off. It's like here where Louisville and Lexington subsidize the poor counties.

But imagine it happens. Texas has a choice. If it goes with the poorer red states, they will have to play sow to those poorer suckling pigs. If the new RedWorld constitution has a Senate, where dirt gets the vote, the Dakotas etc will push Texas around. And the old Dixie states are beyond Poor Relations. So, Texas would have to play a combination of California+New York+New England to subsidize the poor.
Have to admit your uni-party heroes done a great job of driving the manufacturing base out of those areas you deem ignorant and unworthy and into other countries like China. You reek of elitism and narcissism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: exemjr
History has had many brutal dictators. Almost none of them ‘communist’. Was Leopold II communist? Or Caligula, Genghis Khan, or Hitler? American propaganda has done a number on you, my friend. Dictatorship, tyranny, and authoritarianism come in all shapes, sizes, and flavors. America today is and always has been much closer to fascism than communism.
[laughing]

Got that, everybody? History has produced some bad people so pay no mind to the ideology that killed 100 million and oh by the way is also infecting the tiny brains of the democrats.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT