ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
I'm not against equality under the law. I'm for it. It's all of the associated legislation that came along with it. It's not my fault that you're too hysterical to grasp nuanced thought.

Take a break, calm down, get a drink of water, and come back later, when you want to have a serious discussion.

Dion, you're a tourist...
Equality of opportunity ... not equality of result, which is what the left wants.

EDIT: he/it knows exactly what you mean, he/it just has to get mad about something.
 
did not check yesterday, but today I have a monster limb laying on my state of the art above ground garden. I knew I was going to tackle this when the leaves were gone as I did not want it knocking out my fence and garden. For no reason went to look at garden and this giant limb was laying across it.Not sure how it got there but it was a blessing to me seeing it down. I knew I wanted it down but not sure how to do that without racking up my fence. In the last few days, I prayed about such and low in behold we are here....so weas it timely windstorm or something else? Seems very odd that I prayed about how to do this without wrecking my fence and garden. and this happens. That is a true story. I'm not saying the almighty intervened, but it sure was weird to me...

@55wildcat

Can you pray for God to help find you another designated driver? Asking for a friend....
 
I already addressed this. Every other racial demographic is split. Including us as white people. Black people are not. You keep stating they're all wrong, whether intentionally lied to or not is completely immaterial. They are not wrong. You do not know better about their lives than they do. You are being racist saying that one entire race is incapable of making their own decisions, while every other race can.
blacksplain it to us, sus

only "know-it-all" liberals presume to know "why". Conservatives are saying they don't understand when the data doesn't back it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WTF Cat
We didn't loot the resources from central/South America...
Spain and Portugal did.

And talking about racism...have you ever been to Mexico? Pay attention how Spanish ancestry Mexicans treat indigenous Mexicans.
Ok so first off, none of this has anything to do with what was being talked about. But if you want to digress, digress away.

This is crazy talk. Almost every single one of you over the last few months has gone, 'SQWAK! Banana republic! Banana republic! SQWAK!' about Trump's court cases like good little parrots. Y'all know where that phrase comes from right? Literal banana republics, governments set up by fruit corporations, Chiquita, in Central America. What do you think the freaking Panama Canal, a giant gash across the entire continent, is? Imagine typing 'America didn't loot its hemisphere!' for serious in 2024.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan the caddy
I get flak constantly, so much so that there's a post last page about having to put OTHER posters who sling it at me on ignore, not just me. Your criticism is I'm not catching enough? I would think anyone actually anywhere close to the center would see me getting it double-digits to one and probably think that was plenty. But I'll gladly start posting about Medicaid-for-All so he can shit on it if you want him to flex his 'centrist' cred.
I’ll give you credit. You’re not afraid to stand up for your side.
 
Equality of opportunity ... not equality of result, which is what the left wants.
I'm not against equality under the law. I'm for it. It's all of the associated legislation that came along with it. It's not my fault that you're too hysterical to grasp nuanced thought.
Wait, in all the noise last night I must have missed the nuance of this wording. Is @HymanKaplan actually saying he's against the Civil Rights Act? Oh man, we were really in the weeds! Thanks for the spotlight.
 
They're exceptions that prove the rule. Some lucky few make it. Of every race and socioeconomic background. The vast majority do not. If you start out already there, you have a much, much better shot at staying there than having to crawl your way all the way up from the bottom. Why? Because you have the secret sauce that makes our world go, the heart the entire system is named after! Capital. And capital begets capital. If you're black, white, brown, or rainbow striped it's still the same. Just the further you go down the melanin meter generally the more racism gets heaped on top of that.

Oh, did you mean that weird racism interblack, between lighter skinned blacks vs darker skinned ones?

I mean, that is a well known phenomenon, care to explain?

And, yes, everyone, I am baiting his dumb ass amd getting him wound up to go off for like 3 pages.

It's really too easy. If I mention cakes he'll really go wild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dionysus444
ACB was on the short list when Kavanaugh was chosen, so she was pretty much one of the next in line as it was based on merit.

Agreed, and she is supremely qualified, which irks me to no end Trump did the DEI nonsense by saying he was picking a woman.

Leave that shit out of it, dude. Biden, too. Just pick the dam person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
No. You did not address it. If you think you did, you may not understand the point, which has nothing to do with why Trump announced he would replace an iconic woman Justice with another woman Justice.

And, the claim that every VP is a DEI pick just gets a laugh emoji. 😂

I wonder if Dion the historian realizes how we used to pick our VP. LOL
 
01J3FR50X646EXN9FTWABJXXNR.jpeg
 
If the demscould actually change the Supreme Court they would have done it a heart beat after they took control. It's just another talking point to rile up their morons who have no idea how real legislation works. He executive order it and make it so
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
I wonder if Dion the historian realizes how we used to pick our VP. LOL
Don't even go there lol. You know how quick that was changed, right?

Edit to add: Also, it's literally one of the Amendments. Like, I know y'all disagree with me politically, but there aren't very many. That's an awful low bar. We even had a conversation about the Twelfth the other day because of reading out of EC votes nonsense.
 
Last edited:
I was responding to another obsessive compulsive idiot on here.

And what did your mother tell you about that? Think back and realize that every time someone says something about Jan 6, you don't have to post the same shit every single time in response, Village Idiot. Like, anything about it, and here you come, slavishly devoted to your idiocy.
 
Dude, laws that have Zero exceptions for rape or incest are barriers to reproductive health.
There is no push by Dems for completely unrestricted abortions in America.
That's only a narrative pushed by far right Chicken Littles.

And, Village Idiot, stop using reproductive health as euphemism for abortion.

It's not healthy, at all, for a woman's future reproductive health. At all. Look into it. Idiot.

Reproductive health should be used to describe things that make it more likely, like eating right and avoiding STD to increase fertility, not kill fetuses and wreck wombs, you brainwashed Idiot.
 
If Kamla had said there would be no more elections if she wins, my God what different narrative. She'd be communist, dictator, un American, i mean come on

The hypocrisy dudes, my God
I would have no problem with her saying that if it was in the same context as how Trump said it. You are just a dumbass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheFrontRunner
It isn't an estimation. It's 15/7 Pubs since 1970.

Edit: In last 54 years, there have been 22 SC appointments, or one every almost 2-1/2 years. Before then, it was one every 1.8 years and for 73 years there were only six justices, so fewer spot were available. And there were still more appointed per year. NET, justices today stick around way longer on average today.

Your math ain't mathing, NetCat.
 
Oh, did you mean that weird racism interblack, between lighter skinned blacks vs darker skinned ones?

I mean, that is a well known phenomenon, care to explain?

And, yes, everyone, I am baiting his dumb ass amd getting him wound up to go off for like 3 pages.

It's really too easy. If I mention cakes he'll really go wild.
I like cake.
 
Getting cheeky with the emotes so you want me to explain point by point how idiotic your post was?

1) "the soviet union was communist." - Did Stalin live in a one room apartment in a seized mansion? What type of cars did the top brass drive? (Hint: google GAZ Volga) The Soviets used communism as a weapon, not a real ideology.

2) "China is communist." - Ask any economist how they would describe China's economy. Not a single one will say communist. Do you believe the rest of the CCP's lies or do you take them with a healthy dose of salt like the rest of world with functioning brains? Did covid come from the wild like they say?

3) "NK/Cuba/Venezuela/Angola (and a host of other African/Asian/Central and South American States...are under or have suffered through Marxist regimes. It's *always* bad." - This isn't a serious list. The only one on there that even vaguely qualifies is Cuba, and they've been able to be remarkably successful given the brutal and unethical American embargo. North Korea barely even uses the trappings of Marxism, Juche and Kim Il-sung's cult of personality were homegrown.

4) "an all powerful state is a primary tenet of Marxism. In real life anytime a government is communist, oppression/control/subjugation is the norm. It's by design. It's a feature, not a bug." - You obviously haven't read much Marx but what you're referring to is the work of Lenin, not Marx. Lenin was a brilliant and prolific writer, but he was too focused on what he felt was the question of his day, how to implement Marx's observations in his Soviet revolution. Most of his work is practical in nature rather than academic and as such is extremely limited in scope and viability.

5) "communism and fascism are siblings, not opposites." - Fascism was intentionally developed as an opponent and alternative to Marxism(socialism/communism). It was specifically designed and intended by its creators as an opposite. This can be seen in every phase of the ideology. They came for the communists/socialists first and blamed the Reichstag fire on them. Nationalism was paramount over international cooperation. Ethnicity and race were exalted instead of dismissed. Trade unions were banned. Corporations and business leaders were praised. They intentionally did the opposite of every Marxist ideological fixture.
GTr8umRWoAAlvdC
 
I'm taking back the plural 'you' just like y'all tried to appropriate the singular 'they' from nonbinaries. I'm just as Southern as any redneck conservative around here. Online people say my accent's pretty noticeable, even if nothing close to my activist buddy from GA's. That drawl is so much slower than our mountain chicken-squawking.

Burp!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT