It shows that criminals think alike and they know who they want to be president
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
Yes, and fidgeting is a concrete sign that one cannot be successful....ooops, that point is null and void. You lose again. You are good at this.
No answer huh. So you're cool with terrorists supporting Hillary? Interesting.
Hillary got another grand dragons endorsement just this week and nothing but crickets.
If the media wasnt in her pocket, its undenable that trump would have a good sized lead.
If the media wasnt in her pocket, its undenable that trump would have a good sized lead.
HRC fooled around with Gennifer Flowers? Cuban and Trump have a relationship. Flowers and HRC? No.
So, nettling Trump vs trying to humiliate HRC.
So, yes, dirty pool.
As the Irish drunk said, your conclusion is invalid because it is based on licensed premises.
Very likely that is the case. Everything will be done to try and stack the cards against Trump.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2016/09/amazon-steps-in-to-fix-hillary-book-review/
Amazon takes down thousands of negative Hillary reviews.
Amazon takes down thousands of negative Hillary reviews.
(50 lifetime points to whoever gets the reference.)
((explanation available upon request))
When attacked, he attacks back. The way to fight your enemy is when they hit you, you hit them harder. He is simply responding to Hillary's attack. Problem is, you Hillary nut huggers think that she is the only one who should be able to play dirty. You all seem to be following her lead. Her response the other day about why she was not 50 points ahead shows that she believes that she is entitled to the presidency and no one should oppose her. Two back to back dictatorship terms is enough.
If everyone would just stop talking to the stooge, maybe his salary would be cut in half.
Honestly, has he changed his idiotic stance on one point? No
Honestly, has he changed his idiotic stance on one point? No
Money Questions We Want Clinton and Trump to Answer at Monday’s Debate
"But for all the political rhetoric and some fairly detailed policy proposals on issues like taxes and healthcare there is plenty we don't know about where the candidates would lead the country. Here is what MONEY would press them to tell us"
"But for all the political rhetoric and some fairly detailed policy proposals on issues like taxes and healthcare there is plenty we don't know about where the candidates would lead the country. Here is what MONEY would press them to tell us"
Sound and Fury. How is Cuban in attendance playing dirty? Would Trump be humiliated by Cuban's presence. Would Cuban lead anti-Trump chants? Is Cuban going to use sign language to cue HRC?
You make all sorts of interpretations that are mystifying in their logic and derivation. And more than a little odd in your rock-ribbed certainty of their truth. I hope you save that kind of thing for discussion boards.
As normal, you seem to either have missed the obvious or are trying to mislead which really has not worked for you here. Once again for good measure, you really are not very good at this are you.
Flowers and Hillary haven't had a relationship in past?!?! I'm embarassed for you Moe, you're smarter than that.
Through Bill fooling around.
Embarrassment is such an odd emotion. What makes some people blush makes another person laugh.
He does have a good sized lead, several polls have shown that Trump is in command of the race.
The left-wing Wall Street Journal poll shows HRC ahead by 6 points. But they're a small left-wing operation owned by some suspiciously liberal billionaire named Murdstone ... Mudhut ... Murdoch. Something like that.
Hillary incessantly demanding that Holt fact checks Trump in real time, while just completely ignoring all of her lies is detrimental to women & setting them back.
She's doing no favors to help squash the whole "women are weak and naggy" stereotype, only further adding to it.
She's doing no favors to help squash the whole "women are weak and naggy" stereotype, only further adding to it.
If Hillary has no relationship with Flowers as you said, why would her presence bother Hillary? Sounds like the same logic.
Also, eight shot in Baltimore & five shot at the University of Illinois. Total media blackout on all three.
Does arguing in favor of bringing the "other woman" to the debate really bring you credit?
What is the argument against Cuban, btw?
Hillary tried to bury her Moe. Hillary invited Cuban to try and get under Trumps skin, Trump floated invited Flowers for the same reason toward Hillary.
Cuban has been trading barbs with Trump for months now. It is just a way to try a distract Trump. I guess only one side can play dirty.
The poll you mentioned is also ran by NBC, that bastion of right wing conservatism.
It has all 4 candidates in it with Trump at 37%, there is no way in hell Trump gets only 37% of the vote.
You are the one who said that Trump and Cuban have a relationship and that Flowers and Hillary do not have a relationship.
Sounds like Cuban is there to get under Trumps skin. IF there is no relationship between Clinton and Flowers as you claimed.
Why would it matter to Hillary if Jennifer is there? Hell, I doubt Hillary would even know she is there if things are as you claimed.
If its gang or terror related, the media ignores it. But if they find out any of the shooters happens to be white, wall to wall coverage will ensue.
Similar threads
