POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
He was hated by blacks when he was mayor of New York. Al Sharpton told them to. It will be interesting to see if they line up behind him now when they are told to do so. I say some won't
I had to check the date stamp on that tweet. Assumed it was years ago and Photoshopped.
Just blatantly ignoring reality
This Durbin guy, what can you say?
Bloomberg is a bigger gaffe machine than Hillary and Biden. Talk about being out of touch with everyday Americans. He is starting to expose himself every time he talks. No telling how poorly he does when he starts the debates. At least we know what he really thinks of us average everyday Americans...
He is a farmer. Dig a little hole put in the seed, cover it and presto corn. He does not have a clue about life.
Funny that Democrats have been lecturing us for decades about rich old white men and their money. And now they have two rich old billionaires running for President with a millionaire indian squaw and a millionaire socialist. The Diversity party.
I know people have a hard time questioning their political beliefs for the sake of maintaining their own personal security in their beliefs, but they should at least look and consider that which they choose not to believe. This study concurs with the surprise the Koch brothers had when they financed a similar study.
Game changer
Trump administration considers tax incentive for more Americans to buy stocks, report says.
.....
The proposal would allow a portion of household income to be treated as tax-free for the purposes of investing outside a traditional 401(k), CNBC reported, citing four unnamed "senior administration officials familiar with the discussions." Under one potential scenario, a U.S. household earning up to $200,000 could invest $10,000 on a tax-free basis, although the numbers were fluid, CNBC said....
#MAGA.
Trump administration considers tax incentive for more Americans to buy stocks, report says.
.....
The proposal would allow a portion of household income to be treated as tax-free for the purposes of investing outside a traditional 401(k), CNBC reported, citing four unnamed "senior administration officials familiar with the discussions." Under one potential scenario, a U.S. household earning up to $200,000 could invest $10,000 on a tax-free basis, although the numbers were fluid, CNBC said....
#MAGA.
This is nonsense, as I've already explained to you multiple times you only arrive at the position you do by selective picking and choosing of facts and the false interpretation that you are morally superior to other people.
Objective and thorough anaylsis will always show, socialism kills and individual freedom is the greatest moral imperative.
I mean this in good will, figure out why you are wrong while you still can.
FalseI know people have a hard time questioning their political beliefs for the sake of maintaining their own personal security in their beliefs, but they should at least look and consider that which they choose not to believe. This study concurs with the surprise the Koch brothers had when they financed a similar study.
I know people have a hard time questioning their political beliefs for the sake of maintaining their own personal security in their beliefs, but they should at least look and consider that which they choose not to believe. This study concurs with the surprise the Koch brothers had when they financed a similar study.
Medicare for all would save money, guys...
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha...
Hell, if taking on the cost of something for everyone is economical, let's just take over the world. Let's stay in the middle east. Let's keep paying out foreign aid. Let's keep funding all the globalist endeavors that we partake in...to save money.
Like I always say, personally I don't have a beef with healthcare for all if it can be afforded. Right now it can't.
Clean out about a couple trillion dollars a year worth of expenses from the ledgers to make room for it, and then let's talk.
Don't even try to say the military. Libs have made it clear that withholding, even for a second, military spending abroad is an impeachable offense.
Individual freedom cannot be the greatest moral imperative. If it were someone's freedom to chop up hookers or set forest fires would be paramount. That's an idiotic argument.
Medicare for all is idiocy. But healthcare is far too expensive and there are ways to fix that. The lack of imperative to fix this is shameful for both Dems and Republicans.
Most of the people in this country between the ages of 18 and 50 need coverage for 1) routine checkups and tests and 2) prescriptions with some protection for catastrophic accidents. The fact that most people have to pay a double digit percentage of their check to cover their family for those services (and probably not even good coverage) is insane
Most of the people in this country between the ages of 18 and 50 need coverage for 1) routine checkups and tests and 2) prescriptions with some protection for catastrophic accidents. The fact that most people have to pay a double digit percentage of their check to cover their family for those services (and probably not even good coverage) is insane
No, but it is not good that your mind would go to such a extreme. You have to work out fundamental errors like that first to see what is really wrong in your deeply flawed ideology.
Freedom never means freedom to inflict suffering for anyone soundly grounded in reason. Individual freedom can also be thought of as freedom from the collective, freedom from the suffering they might inflict due to flawed judgement... the same way it is freedom from the flawed judgement of say a king in his despotic rule. These are fundamental, foundational American values that should be taught better/clearer and maybe we wouldn't be experiencing this nonsense.
You'll never hear Bernie praise individual freedom, and there's a reason for that... and it's not because it's an idiotic argument.
Medicare for All is so goddam stupid it really isn’t even worth discussing. Anyone who looks at the billions of dollars already wasted in Medicare, the cluster**** that is Obamacare, the waste in our defense department, the skyrocketing costs of education with poor results, etc., and thinks MORE government involvement in the health care industry will lower costs and make outcomes better needs to be removed from the gene pool.
The fact that some people can make it to adulthood and believe in the fairy tales Bernie Sanders is peddling is proof positive our education system has failed.
The fact that some people can make it to adulthood and believe in the fairy tales Bernie Sanders is peddling is proof positive our education system has failed.
Still poor logic. Affordability is only part of the equation. It is a fact that government controlled healthcare for all will greatly weaken or even destroy our healthcare system. Most have no clue what this actually means. It's not a utopia as some seem to think and all will suddenly have access to healthcare. It will have the inverse effect of those that currently have it will struggle to keep it and those that dont will continue to not.
And remember, just a few short years ago, the Democrats ramrodded Obamacare up the country’s ass under the guise of “healthcare reform”.
At the time everyone with a single bit of sense said it was going to fail, but it was the governments next step toward a single payer health care system.
Here we are. A dismal failure of a law, some unbelievable Supreme Court precedent, and Democrat candidates campaigning on single payer.
At the time everyone with a single bit of sense said it was going to fail, but it was the governments next step toward a single payer health care system.
Here we are. A dismal failure of a law, some unbelievable Supreme Court precedent, and Democrat candidates campaigning on single payer.
![[laughing]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/laugh.r191677.gif "Laughing [laughing]")
Speaking of bail reform...AOC chimes in...
The individual and the collective must be balanced. Go too far to one extreme and you have anarchy, too far to the other and there's oppression. Life is complicated and nuanced. Blindly thinking freedom = good is caveman logic.
It cannot be overstated how comical it is that the Democrats are going to sell their nomination to a billionaire who’s signature policy was randomly stopping minorities and searching them on the streets.
I am sorry I did not read. Too busy looking at that rack....
The individual and collective are balanced; no one is oppressed and you don't live in anarchy or a society where you have the freedoms like you thought of. The logic that places freedom as a moral virtue is leaps and bounds superior to all attempts to destroy it, both intellectually and demonstrably through history.
What you want is the freedom to force others to work for your betterment and you'll never have that here in the USA... and if by some chance it does happen, you'll wish it didn't.
To the extent that people were or are still oppressed in our society, it has only ever been lessened in the name of advancing freedom, never in the name of freeing the oppressed for the greater good.
Looks like enhancements were purchased?
Was thinking the exact same thing. May be the angle of the photo but those cans look bigger. Have a feeling she is a hand full in the sack. Dumb and dangerous as shi! but no denying she is an attractive woman.
Despite being a fiscal conservative, I support that bill.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
The Ukraine war. (Yes, we'll mind our manners)- Latest: UKBrassowTipIN