ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Any sane Democrat in Congress should probably take a step back and realize this impeachment ruse has completely backfired, Trump is going to be elected again, and it would behoove them to go ahead and throw Adam Schiff and a good portion of the House Democrats under the bus.

Would be the perfect time to run from the radicals. Schiff and the impeachers. The Squad. Etc. Just say certain blocks of the House are out of control if they want to salvage 2022 and 2024 they should start now.
 
The dem party is collapsing and it's all their own doing. After endless political stunts and obvious desperation for power and control, now they're facing civil war in their own party between corrupt establishment and communists made even worse by cancel culture sjw's,

This is what's scary about the socialists and all of them are too dumb to see. Even if they are convinced Bernie is some good guy...he cant be around forever and eventually you turn this massive govt over to someone else who can interpret and enforce their nonsense as they see fit.

Yesterday Warren wanted to criminalize "inappropriate speech" meaning tech companies would have to hand over anything she deemed unapproved. Imagine what rabbit hole that goes down in the future
LOL
Maybe she needs to tell her liberal leader colleagues in NYC to fix it.

Look I know the knee jerk reaction of nearly all addled-minded and unprincipled Trump supporters is to blame somebody, ---anybody other than themselves for ----well everything really, but my friend the clear redline to this issue by our mostly conservative and definitely criminal bankers has been clearly defined. Maybe you should try to educate yourself on the matter before exposing your dismal understanding of the issue at hand.
 
Maddog is practicing her look of gloom...


rachel-maddow-sad-upset-teary-eyed-.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: screwduke1
Or how about female teachers who repeatedly underage students?

Equality indeed....



I'm not talking about power points. I'm talking about smooth delivery and simple effective presentation of points. These people are surprisingly lacking in that regard.
Well they are not used to being in front of the camera on a national stage of this magnitude, their regular trials are not broadcast on all networks. Meanwhile the Democratic turds live with a camera in their face via political newscasts, so it’s just a matter of tv experience.
 
I like KSR. I listen every day but damn they are liberal. They are on a road trip to the Iowa caucus and just complained that Iowa is too white. Smh
This is very important to Matt Jones and Ryan the Little Man.

Do they know Trump will have a rally in Iowa tonight He will have more people at his rally than the entire Democrat field has had in the past month, combined. KSR is wasting their time in Iowa but bless their heart and to each his own. A lot of KSR fanatics are very impressed with the political genius of Matthew Jones, the liberal political wannabee.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ymmot31 and mdlUK.1
People wanting to work low wage dead end jobs is our "national crisis", lmao. not a staggering 80% gdp debt, massive student loan debt, enormous income imbalance, crumbling infrastructure, opiod epidemic, almost 20 year ME wars, and a dozen other things. No, people wanting to fill the 7million unfilled jobs is our crisis, get ****ing real.
True.

84183498_2639582096259689_4010708153984352256_n.jpg
 
This is very important to Matt Jones and Ryan the Little Man.

Do they know Trump will have a rally in Iowa tonight He will have more people at his rally than the entire Democrat field has had in the past month, combined. KSR is wasting their time in Iowa but bless their heart and each to his own. A lot of KSR fanatics are very impressed with the political genius of Matthew Jones, the liberal political wannabees .

They contemplated going to the Trump rally, but it was a long drive and a long wait. MJ isn't a political genius, but he is good at making a radio show. Their interactions in Iowa are hilarious and informative about how the system actually works.

Nobody on any campaign responds to any request even though Matt knows a few staffers. The candidates are all late, and some don't even show. How disorganized are these organizations? How could these campaigns possibly scale and run the country? They let a few goobers claim they are media and get into a situation where they are taking selfies with bunny ears on the former VP.
 
Well they are not used to being in front of the camera on a national stage of this magnitude, their regular trials are not broadcast on all networks. Meanwhile the Democratic turds live with a camera in their face via political newscasts, so it’s just a matter of tv experience.
I am not buying into the premise the members of President's legal team are making a poor presentation of Trump's defense. They are making a brilliant presentation and know the law back and forward and upside down. The fact that the media is ripping them is a sign they are winning. When I look at a lying sack of Schitt and the imbecile Jerry Nadler and the other members who are totally mentally challenged then compare their presentation to Pam Bondi, Jay Sekulow, Alan Dershowitz and the rest of the team it is laughable to think the House Leaders are more impressive.

The defense plan of action has been brilliant. They have exposed Schitt as a liar, Nadler to be a joke and exposed Joe Biden's crookedness and shot down John Bolton as their "bombshell" manuscript weapon to drive Trump out of office. To me that is impressive.

The only hope Dems have now is some off the wall ruling by the Never Trumper Chief Justice John Roberts. He has to be burning up the way this is going so look for some Democrat to make a motion for him to get involved to save their butt. This Chief Justice saved Obamacare and he would love to be the one to run Trump out of office. Just like all Never Trumpers
 
Virginia’s governor called himself Coonman and we still don’t know if he was the guy in the kkk robe, or in racist blackface.

That’s not like, “oh I went as Michael Jackson for Halloween in high school” which can be funny, that is just pure blatant racism.

I assume Justin Castreau is closer to the attempt at humor, like the Wayans brothers in White Chicks doing the opposite, although I’ve never watch the Castreau video or White Chicks.

Governor Coonman is a flat out racist. But I never understood why painting yourself black to go in costume was like the end all of racism. When I think “blackface” I think of people painting themselves like cartoons from the fifties or whatever. Not like Jimmy Kimmel painting himself brown for a Karl Malone impression.
 
LOL


Look I know the knee jerk reaction of nearly all addled-minded and unprincipled Trump supporters is to blame somebody, ---anybody other than themselves for ----well everything really, but my friend the clear redline to this issue by our mostly conservative and definitely criminal bankers has been clearly defined. Maybe you should try to educate yourself on the matter before exposing your dismal understanding of the issue at hand.

As you accuse conservatives of blaming somebody other than themselves for everything, and in the same breath blame housing issues on racism. Do you have any ability to analyze yourself whatsoever? Does it ever dawn on you what a hypocritical ass you sound like? Or are you all in on victimhood like the rest of your party? Or do you just hope that if you post enough of this bs that George Soros will send you a check?
 
This thing is over. They have nothing, end it. Schiff trying to claim extortion and bribery is absurd...why didnt you put it in the articles of impeachment then? He knows this and hes just trying to get nonsense on the record and bc lib constituents are morons that dont care about the why only the who.

They are simply trying to make the acquittal look bad for political reasons.
 

Something most don't consider: I don't think anyone on scotus ever tried a case or sat as judge over an actual trial. As an appellate review, the record itself is always boxed up and the the only question is an application of law to existing fact.

But it takes experience as a trial court judge to govern rules related to fact finding. Obviously Roberts is pitiful in this regard. Why? Because not only are they allowing hearsay when the witness is perfectly capable of appearing to testify, but they're also allowing consideration of said hearsay without the ID of the witness.

Why is the ID important? Hearsay is generally not allowed because the fact finder is not given the opportunity to ascertain the veracity of the witness/information. In hearings not bound by rules of evidence (like this), hearsay is generally allowed and the fact finder can decide if they find the information credible.

Without knowing the ID this is impossible to know. There can easily be potential bias, propensity for making false statements, criminal conduct, previous inconsistent statements, etc which are all routinely used to attack credibility of a witness.

To not force the disclosure of this witness will be tantamount to one of the greatest miscarriage and misapplication of justice in American history.
 
Well they are not used to being in front of the camera on a national stage of this magnitude, their regular trials are not broadcast on all networks. Meanwhile the Democratic turds live with a camera in their face via political newscasts, so it’s just a matter of tv experience.

There are plenty lawyer out there with much better delivery. Style and substance both matter in this situation with so many cameras.

Megyn Kelly lost her job for wondering out loud "what's so offensive about blackface". The Virginia governor is the most amazing character in politics.

He's a Dem. He can do what he wants. They followed up that fiasco by handing out cotton to blacks in the governors mansion.

If you're on the right team, you can do whatever you want
 
  • Like
Reactions: JStaff2187
There are plenty lawyer out there with much better delivery. Style and substance both matter in this situation with so many cameras.



He's a Dem. He can do what he wants. They followed up that fiasco by handing out cotton to blacks in the governors mansion.

If you're on the right team, you can do whatever you want
I don’t need a slick talker to convince me, just the truth. If senators are swayed by delivery then they aren’t smart enough to be senators.
 
I am not buying into the premise the members of President's legal team are making a poor presentation of Trump's defense. They are making a brilliant presentation and know the law back and forward and upside down. The fact that the media is ripping them is a sign they are winning. When I look at a lying sack of Schitt and the imbecile Jerry Nadler and the other members who are totally mentally challenged then compare their presentation to Pam Bondi, Jay Sekulow, Alan Dershowitz and the rest of the team it is laughable to think the House Leaders are more impressive.

The defense plan of action has been brilliant. They have exposed Schitt as a liar, Nadler to be a joke and exposed Joe Biden's crookedness and shot down John Bolton as their "bombshell" manuscript weapon to drive Trump out of office. To me that is impressive.

The only hope Dems have now is some off the wall ruling by the Never Trumper Chief Justice John Roberts. He has to be burning up the way this is going so look for some Democrat to make a motion for him to get involved to save their butt. This Chief Justice saved Obamacare and he would love to be the one to run Trump out of office. Just like all Never Trumpers
I agree they have been impressive, I think the other poster isn’t impressed with how they convey the message in some way. I gave a reason to excuse any perceived flaw.
 
Eating their own to pave the way for Killary.

I'm waiting for Butty to call her a homophobe.





Mayor Pete's connection or lack of with the black community is one of the funnier things from this election for me.

No matter what this dude does or say they just freaking hate him haha. While Elizabeth Warren can claim to be a minority, Joe Biden can tell creepy stories of black kids feeling up his legs and Corn Pop and they get passes. But Pete says he's from the American Heartland, that's a racist dog whistle haha. Reading some of the comments on that tweet from well known black people is hilarious.

If Pete won the nomination, I could see Trump getting the majority of black votes, that's how much they hate the guy haha.
 
I don’t need a slick talker to convince me, just the truth. If senators are swayed by delivery then they aren’t smart enough to be senators.

I'm not talking about a slick talker. But better than this.

Style and substance counts especially in a way of public opinion. Even more when the msm is against you
 
am not buying into the premise the members of President's legal team are making a poor presentation of Trump's defense.

They're fine in terms of substance. Which is good because they have both law and fact on their side.

But presentation is weak. All the ums and ahs, monotonous are noticable to anyone doing high level legal argument/public speaking. And makes a difference when Joe blow is on the couch trying to figure out what's going on.

They are fine. But for people chosen to present a potential once in a lifetime argument, I expected better
 
  • Like
Reactions: augustaky1
I believe paul wanted to call the whistleblower as a witness?

I am sure Rand Paul will issue a statement to the press after being slapped down by the Chief Justice. It should be interesting. And I bet if we find out what the question was, every body in D.C. already knows the answer.

We already know what the question was. I do anyway. He did not mention "whistleblower" in the question. It was more along the lines of did holdovers from the O'bama admin in the state dept coordinate with members of Schitt's committee to bring down the President?

Here's a question. 17 people stood in front of the country and testified against the President. They testified about a phone call in spite of us being able to see the actual transcript. Why are their lives not in danger? Why are their lives not as important as the whistleblowers? Why do we never see credible evidence of these so called threats?

These dems have handled this entire fiasco much like an 8 year old child would explain how he didn't break the vase when you know he was the only one in the room.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT