I lurk around here to hear different opinions, and every so often I have to chime in. I agree with the statements you have made about Franken and Conyers. Every once in a while the democrats make a shrewd political move. I think they have done so here in attempt to gain some perceived high ground. This should in no way be attributed to Pelosi who was calling Conyers an icon just days before he resigned.Who was the female Trump was speaking about on that tape?
Is dating much younger women a crime? Dating younger women is a far cry from sexually assaulting a 14 year old.
What does Trump paying settlements have anything to do with this? Calipari paid a settlement in Memphis, people pay settlements to keep from getting their name drug through the mud.
I personally don't think Franken or Conyers should've resigned, but what you need to understand is WHY they resigned, which Franken still hasn't. They were sacrificed so the left could go after Trump and Moore, thats it.
Also, a Franken resignation isn't nearly that big a deal to Democrats since Minnesota has a democratic governor. But to ignore evidence against Trump is to basically wipe his slate clean the day he walked into office. The bus recording alone would be enough to lend credence to his accusers. A review of other statements on other programs would only add fuel to the fire. It's crazy to say this, but Howard Stern's refusal to release tapes of Donald Trump factored into our election. I agree with his refusal by the way but still think it was a factor. Regardless, I've got to call out bias when I see it.
Last edited: