They keep trying to dehumanize the fetus by saying it is not human. I have challenged them in the past to show me where that fetus can be manipulated or changed to be anything other than human. They never answer that challenge. Why? Because there is nothing that can be introduced anytime during the pregnancy that would change that human fetus into anything else. It would only kill it.
TrumPutin Commie Party.
Russia, Russia, Russia.
No wonder Trump won't back Ukraine. 🤬
Trump had as many as 7 private calls with Putin since leaving office, Bob Woodward writes in new book
Bob Woodward writes in his new book “War” that Donald Trump has had as many as seven private phone calls with Vladimir Putin since leaving office and that he secretly sent the Russian president COVID-19 test machines in 2020.www.pbs.org
So let me get this straight ... he is saying it is "responsible" to let ANYONE vote in an election?!?! Oh good grief...
OK, but Trump is committed to not touching SS or Medicare. So how is he going to even dent that?
Yes it does. A pregnant woman was murdered there before the law. Her murderer could only be charged with one murder, even if prosecutors wanted more. Why? If fetuses were already people you wouldn't need the law and could double charge them without it.
No, hate crimes are a classification that ups the severity. If you commit a crime against someone you will be charged for that crime. If hate was the motive the penalty can then be upped. You could always charge them with the original crime though, without the hate crime law. Unlike fetuses which require a special law to even be a crime. See the difference?
True. Your post that is. That is exactly how they would frame it.
Trump recently met with Netanyahu. Something wrong with that? If so, you're the first to say so.
Drove thru there today. Why do people live there? Because it is freaking beautiful, duh. It was beautiful today. Talked to a resident who said there hasn't been terrible damage like the projection in ~100 years. 1. They're due. 2. this doesn't happen daily.
I would think "Mr. Progressive" himself of all people would understand that we make new laws all the time to correct flaws in the system. Afterall, at one point in time we had laws that didn't recognize slaves as people. Were slaves not people before we changed the law? So sure, one could argue that at one point in time, fetuses were not recognized as people. But laws were put in place to change that. And they have. Just because you have some weird view of the intent of the law doesn't change the fact that there is more legal precedent for fetuses being "persons" than there isn't. The only claim you had was Roe V Wade and that has, as I said before, been rightfully overturned and no longer holds any ground for legal precedent.
That's how it is in every single law. Otherwise specific carveouts wouldn't even be necessary. Can a pregnant woman drive in the carpool lane? Can she claim her fetuses as a dependent? Can she do a single thing in America that requires two people?
How do you have time to respond during election denial and US Capitol attack season?? The irony is that TrumPutin is everything you accuse me of being.
You’re clearly right, but don’t get him going on that again.
I've said over and over you're free to make those laws according to your personal moral code. But until you do fetuses are not people.
Wonder if Cnn, Biden, and Kamala will call out 60 minutes for misinformation?CBS under fire for editing out Kamala Harris 'word salad' on Israel
CBS News appears to have edited the 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris to show the Democratic 2024 hopeful in a more positive light.www.dailymail.co.uk
Ah, I see you aren't capable of having a logical discussion either and can only respond with BS fear mongering.
Oh, I'll find some way to work in some time.
Again, why does this law exist? It wouldn't be necessary if they were already people, right? They would already be covered. They aren't charging them with an additional crime.Once again, not true.
The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[1]
Unborn Victims of Violence Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Come on VHcat, you are better than using circular arguments. We've already gone over that being able to be claimed as a dependent has no bearing on if someone is a person. Are you smart enough to even know why carpool lanes exist? That fact that you are using that in this argument suggests that you don't, which means you are dumber than I thought. The reason an unborn child doesn't count in carpool lanes is because an officer cannot visibly establish the occupancy of a vehicle before making the traffic stop. It doesn't validate your position that an unborn child isn't a person. You really let your arguments get more and more ridiculous as you lose.
That just can't be. The liberal media wouldn't do that would they?CBS under fire for editing out Kamala Harris 'word salad' on Israel
CBS News appears to have edited the 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris to show the Democratic 2024 hopeful in a more positive light.www.dailymail.co.uk
There are laws already you dimwit. We've been pointing them out to you but you keep ignoring it. My goodness you are so blind to your cause it's disturbing. You're like a programmed robot that glitches out when it runs into a command it wasn't programmed for. You're liberal talking points are failing you so you just ignore the arguments you can't dispute.
Let it be known to everyone on this board, that Dion did not believe African Americans who were slaves were actually people. If they were people, we wouldn't have needed a law to tell us so. I always thought you were racist but now you have proven it to me with your own logic.
