ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Kentucky's labor force is ~5% foreign born.
Texas's is ~21% foreign born.
Florida's is ~25% foreign born.

Agriculture is even more pronounced. 1 in 3 of Florida's agriculture workers are foreign born.

Nation-wide 1 in 5 of all workers are foreign born.

Now, it's entirely possible that Trump and the Republicans hatred of immigrants is entirely theatrical, only meant to stir up the dumbos and the anxious. But Trump and Republicans may hate everything except power and the unrest that would come from the destruction of the economy may be exactly what they have in mind. Look at the peculiar face tint of Cheeto Mussolini and tell me you see a face of love.

Regardless, what Trump and Republicans are proposing would destroy the economy and the character of the country. Concentration camps are not a good thing.
We need immigrants and immigration. But the process is in dire need of improvement.
On those points I think the majority of Americans can agree.
 
Democrats DESPERATELY want to appear reasonable to others. Why? Because IF they can fool just ONE person, then they are perfectly content to remain couched in their ignorant and/or neglectful state.

That is the essence of the success of social media. For stupidity to remain victorious in the life of one Dem, they just have to find another D that agrees with them, or better yet a registered R that accepts their lies without calling them out on them. Thats all the excuse they need.
 

So tired of people afraid to tell it like it is. Any person running for office or otherwise that speaks or votes this way is a threat to this republic. Equal under the law applies to non-criminal citizens. The Democrats who would excoriate Trump if he said this will be quiet as a church mouse about this where it matters most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
I'm sensing that the Iranian government is colluding with Biden-Harris to undermine our democracy with their hacking of the Trump campaign. Our sleepwalking media is more worried about disproving Haitians eating / not eating pets in Springfield then they are about who has facilitated two assassination attempts on Trump's life. It's beyond pathetic.
 
Socialism is absolutely restrained to Marxism. That's how it was invented, why it exists. It's an economic theory arising from his works. That's like saying, 'I know y'all say the sky is blue, but it's really red. Jews just corrupted the term red and associated it with blood, but I personally think the true association is with fluid, so it's the color of water too. So the sky is red, according to me.' He's completely redefining a term because he doesn't like who uses it and how popular it is. If I start calling my phone 'hotdog' because I think hotdogs are gross and am 'Taking the term back!', that doesn't mean my phone is actually a hotdog.
Do you feel that way about gender?
 
No, we first need to start by incentivizing our own citizens to join the work force, which has declined under Biden.
Agreed.

Immigration piece requires considerably more work, namely accountability.

For example, Jocelyn Nungaray murder is a damned outrage. Many in Texas Latino community support Ted Cruz over Colin Allred because of that single issue. Some in Allred's camp advise him to ignore it.


@sambowieshin ; @DreadLox : Don't even get me started on this subject because I will embarrass hell outta you.

Accountability. Repeat. Accountability.
 
Last edited:

Democrats would rather wager 10s of millions of other people's lives on one, 10,000/1 odds against a positive outcome gamble than accept facts and a proven track record of benefit to a capitalist system. They're sick

Of course they wouldn't understand the difference between what they call greed and the system that is capitalism itself, as if somehow socialism is immune to the effects of greed despite the evidence to the contrary
 
My buddy just had a public conversation with a misinformed liberal. After stressing (emotionally/visibly angry) that they were "reasonable" in their choice of candidate, they admitted 1) they "hate Trump" so nothing anyone says is going to register, 2) they couldn't listen to any reasonable examples as to the differences between the 2 candidates (because they didn't want to hear any negatives about D candidates), and 3) iirc what they said, when finally unable to come up with ANY specific instances where they said Trump did what they accuse him of doing, 4) reverted to "well both sides do it" and ended the argument when they couldn't prove the R candidate did what the D candidates have been doing.
Had a similar conversation yesterday. Guy was telling me and his daughter that the stories about Springfield were false. Trump, right wing disinfo. He used to live very close to S'field and is very familiar with the city and surrounding area. I ended the conversation (so called) telling him to take a drive to S'field and drive around...and if I was lying....I'd buy him a steak dinner.
Decent guy until it comes to politics. 100% Dem (but not real liberal). And...I think...the kind of guy that if he took me up on my challenge would come back and tell the truth. And may even buy me a steak. But I'm not holding my breath on that.
 
How can someone so completely incapable of expressing a coherent thought about inflation and her 'plan' to combat it be this near the Presidency? My goodness, I'm not a politician and have no desire to ever be one, but I can answer some basic questions about the economy and, if I were running for office, I'd sure as hell have just a few basic talking points regarding my plan for improving the economy. No one expects her to lecture like an individual with a PhD in Economics. But, to just say absolutely nothing time after time after time is surely starting to wear thin on voters. And why haven't her staff and aides provided her with a couple of sentences on four or five major topics (border, gov't spending, inflation/cost of living, crime, abortion) that she can regurgitate in a coma? Instead, she consistently comes across as being unprepared, unwilling to actually answer a question, flippant and downright unintelligent. That's the person who people are voting for? If she wins, what are you expecting to get - more unpreparedness, more dodging of important questions, gaslighting, inappropriate giggles and nonsensical word salad? Sounds great, right?
Can you imagine her first Presidential address to the nation?

Twilight Zone Nigtmare GIF
 
Do you feel that way about gender?
No, gender is an emergent social construct, not a philosophical/economic/political theory. You can create those things that involve gender, but then you're talking about those theories, not gender itself. What you actually mean is biological sex, right? Which is determined by various physical biological indicators, some of which are malleable while others aren't. If an adult male undergoes surgeries to physically resemble a female in every way, most people would say that's a man that became a woman. They're still male with XY chromosomes biologically, but they're a woman in every functional, societal, practical way that matters to broader society, so they're a woman as that's societal defined. Notice how none of this is applicable to the previous topic? Your ham-fisted attempt at analogy is just deflection.
 
Confirmed. The IDF has eliminated Ibrahim Aqil, Hezbollah Radwan Force commander and head of Hezbollah Operations.

During the 1980s, Aqil, was a principal member of the terrorist cell that claimed the bombings of the US Embassy in Beirut in April 1983, which killed 63 people.


Uhhhh, has anybody ever noticed that Israel NEVER loses to these MFers?
 
No, gender is an emergent social construct, not a philosophical/economic/political theory. You can create those things that involve gender, but then you're talking about those theories, not gender itself. What you actually mean is biological sex, right? Which is determined by various physical biological indicators, some of which are malleable while others aren't. If an adult male undergoes surgeries to physically resemble a female in every way, most people would say that's a man that became a woman. They're still male with XY chromosomes biologically, but they're a woman in every functional, societal, practical way that matters to broader society, so they're a woman as that's societal defined. Notice how none of this is applicable to the previous topic? Your ham-fisted attempt at analogy is just deflection.

The idea that chromosomes are fixed things with fixed functions is strange. There are mutations all along chromosomes. No two of us are alike. And genes aren't even fixed in how they function. Here's a pic of the first cat to be cloned and its source. Identical genetics, but the expression of those genes produced a very different cat.

The way people respond to transsexuals is baffling. Some people feel betrayed by their bodies. Their bodies don't reflect who they are. So, they try to fix it. Who doesn't do that? None of us feel that we're a slave to our genes. What business is it of someone else? Some people act as if they aren't cruel to someone who's different that they aren't quite complete. The right to be cruel. Even worse: the right to be admired for being cruel.

cat-Allie-CC-December-22-2001.jpg
 
No, gender is an emergent social construct, not a philosophical/economic/political theory. You can create those things that involve gender, but then you're talking about those theories, not gender itself. What you actually mean is biological sex, right? Which is determined by various physical biological indicators, some of which are malleable while others aren't. If an adult male undergoes surgeries to physically resemble a female in every way, most people would say that's a man that became a woman. They're still male with XY chromosomes biologically, but they're a woman in every functional, societal, practical way that matters to broader society, so they're a woman as that's societal defined. Notice how none of this is applicable to the previous topic? Your ham-fisted attempt at analogy is just deflection.


goodfellas-henry-hill.gif
 
I'm sensing that the Iranian government is colluding with Biden-Harris to undermine our democracy with their hacking of the Trump campaign. Our sleepwalking media is more worried about disproving Haitians eating / not eating pets in Springfield then they are about who has facilitated two assassination attempts on Trump's life. It's beyond pathetic.
If you have any doubts, just recall this:
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT