Sen. Fetterman was just now on Jessie Watters. I gotta admit, he is a good dude. Hard not to like him and appreciate the battle he had with his stroke. He doesn't seem to be a liar and crook like so many in the congress.
JMHO
JMHO
POLITICAL THREAD
- Thread starter kybobcat
- Start date
The iron in this statement. You are full of cognitive dissonance that you’re swimming in your eyeballs in it.
Like I said. You are a liar. An ignorant liar
no that is not what he said. He said Mike Pence couldn’t overturn the election. That is true. But there is recourse of an election that is fraudulently stolen
Lucky for Dion that Mike worked with Nancy and the FBI to cause an emergency vote to stop any looking into their fraud.
The coup happened on November 3rd, 2020
The coup happened on November 3rd, 2020
Of course you think the Biden DOJ was justified in imprisoning its political opponents.
I’m sure you also think Bannon and Navarro belong in jail, and Garland is fully justified ignoring subpoenas. Etc.
Jews are the only people who wrongfully imprison anyone.
@Dionysus444 and @sammysdad05 will hate this...bc its not a hysterical take of what something actually says. Ie project 2025
Well, I guess anyone can. They're public record. I already suggested the Exchequer, but I guess anyone that has a pad and a pencil could do it. Or an intern with a chalkboard. Or someone with a tablet. Maybe a wax tablet with a sharpened reed?
Maybe they could have an old fashioned type baseball scoreboard, that a person has to hand change the numbers.
They could do it in binary. 100001110 = 270 if you're scoring at home.
Last edited:
I specifically said in the very post you quoted, "Whether you think they should be prosecuted for it is a legitimate question". Whether they should or should not be prosecuted is irrelevant to the fact of whether or not they actually did it. Which they did.
The Constitution specifies it can only be one person: "The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted." No one else. Looks like your accusation of making up fantasies was classic projection.
Who is the real threat to Democracy? Let's just watch the Dems and how they propose their own slate of fake delegates at the DNC.
Dem VOTERS spoke. Joe won. End of story in a party that values democratic process. But if it is authoritarian and unwilling to let the PEOPLE rather than the elites pick their candidate, then they will change the rules and overturn the will of the people.
Trump is the threat? Let's watch the REAL threat. We know where this goes.
Dem VOTERS spoke. Joe won. End of story in a party that values democratic process. But if it is authoritarian and unwilling to let the PEOPLE rather than the elites pick their candidate, then they will change the rules and overturn the will of the people.
Trump is the threat? Let's watch the REAL threat. We know where this goes.
That just says the President of the Senate, in the the presence of the Senate and HOR shall OPEN the Certificates which shall then be counted. It doesn't say who COUNTS them.
So, like I said, it could be any of my suggestions above. (mic drop) I have handed you your ass all evening. You know it, I know it, the people know it. LOL
God help us if Dion ever gets elected. The bureaucratic minutae will be the likes never before seen by mankind. LOL
Mods, feel free to remove this entire argument. I'm half tempted to ban Dion, AND myself (for continuing on with this nonsense)
So, like I said, it could be any of my suggestions above. (mic drop) I have handed you your ass all evening. You know it, I know it, the people know it. LOL
God help us if Dion ever gets elected. The bureaucratic minutae will be the likes never before seen by mankind. LOL
Mods, feel free to remove this entire argument. I'm half tempted to ban Dion, AND myself (for continuing on with this nonsense)
Last edited:
No. The President of the Senate counts them as part of that clause. From the very first presidential election. The Electoral Count Act, which you already referenced yourself, reinforces that in its power of law as well, so arguing that supposed ambiguity is already a nonstarter.
Actually, the clerk tallies and counts the votes, which are then verified and signed bubba. The Senate President presides over the count "ministerially" (that means he says the votes aloud)
Wrong at every single turn, you are...
Wrong at every single turn, you are...
You have only proven yourself to be ignorant of our Constitution. Again you just try to run away because you have no answer. It would've been an immediate constitutional crisis that we have no answers for. The only other vaguely similar situation was the contested election of 1876 which was only resolved through shady backroom deals that would never fly today. The entire point of writing the Electoral Count Act was so this would never be attempted again. But it was, in an even worse and more nefarious way than the racist postwar South tried it.
Dion is an anthropomorphized hamster wheel. LOL
getting ready in michigan
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signs controversial election recount, fraud bills into law
Michigan’s process of handling election recounts and fraud allegations has changed, with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signing two controversial bills into law Monday.nypost.com
“the law will eliminate the board of canvasser’s investigative powers, instead requiring the board to refer any allegations of fraud to the relevant county prosecutor, rather than conducting a recount.
Only alleged errors could merit a recount, and only when the alleged errors could potentially change election results.”
No, you are ignorant of the constitution. There would not be a “constitutional crisis “ if you all had not committed a coup on November 3rd, 2020. You all have pissed all over the constitution. Pissed on it and you have the audacity to think you know. Piss off liar
The Teller records the votes that are read out by the President of the Senate. You're just reinforcing my point by highlighting that conflict, what would have happened had Pence read out Trump's fakes? Would the Tellers be forced to record them? Could they even record the real ones since they weren't read out by Pence at all? It's totally unresolved and complete chaos.
Dion is such a fake scholar on anything.
Just a NPC with fascist talking points
Just a NPC with fascist talking points
Yes, nobody would notice if Pence started spouting off invalid electoral results. LOL (and they are checked and verified) LOL
No disrespect, but were you ever tested for Asperger's? (it's never too late)
Well, it turns out there was no problem from NOT taking the vax. And that's a win in my book.
Ok cool. How do I get my ballot to vote for Le Pen in France? It would be bigoted for them to only allow the French to vote in the election over there.
Imagine having millions of people overrun your border and your government hiding and lying the truth at every turn…..
and believing there’s still a constitutional republic.
Also, he was awesome in Goonies. (kidding. I get what you mean. He is turning into a sensible Democrat. He's got an open mind, which is rare for either party)
More deflections and insults. Obviously people would notice. Democrats would've been justifiably outraged and chaos would've ensued. To be resolved exactly how?
You’re asking for links from the media that has lied about everything for years? What does Snopes say, Karl?
It's all in your mind my man. All in your mind. that wasn't an insult. I'm truly concerned about you. the repetitive thinking is not a good sign.
😂
That was fun and embarrassing.
Why was Shapiro there? I’m in the dark and don’t know why he was being asked questions.
But I do like how something that none of us know about or talk about amongst ourselves and has never come up once is apparently now the biggest thing ever now in the past week thanks to Democrats and “project 25” (such typical DNC garbage) who continue to push this new boogeyman talking point.
The alternate electors were for future and ongoing court cases. j6 riots made sure that no judge was going to hear those cases in good faith. Three times the US has refused electors until a court decided on who won. Nixon actually rejected his winning of Hawaii due to some shady stuff alleged. Dems were given the win in Hawaii even though Nixon had won on election day. People that act like this isn't something that was well known in DC just haven't read up on it.
Look, I know you think human history began the instant you were born, but it there is in actuality a long a storied history of authorities repressing their people. I am not going to take our relative position of power provided to us by our Constitution for granted. Our rights are extremely valuable and what distinguish us. Now look who's the 'America hater'...
I'm going to start researching if anyone makes "chicken sized" N95 masks and go all in.
Similar threads
