ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Guy on internet who types lolololol like it's AOL in 1997. Let's see how many internet cliches we can hit. Maybe next you can compare Biden to Hitler and type the term "communist" in exchange for Democrats. lolololol
did you just finish your chores? Good boy. Keep it up, it is a long summer.

Still havent heard from you a reason why christians should vote for china joe. Until you provide good thoughtful reasons, the record isnt good for you. Many folks have provided reasons to NOT vote for him. Genuinely.
 
did you just finish your chores? Good boy. Keep it up, it is a long summer.

Still havent heard from you a reason why christians should vote for china joe. Until you provide good thoughtful reasons, the record isnt good for you. Many folks have provided reasons to NOT vote for him. Genuinely.
lol, you’re a clueless commie.

What evidence did the prosecutors present that was a good job?

Be specific lol (I know you won’t, because you are clueless commie, just like your pride flag loving “buddy” Nightwish)
Frustrated Headache GIF by Kelly Clarkson
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ukalum1988
What are you rambling on about?

Oh poor Government…

I was talking about the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle. You don’t think gov and pharma $$$ are attached at the hip?
That's obviously still Big Pharma's fault for paying them. Your post was a response to why you don't want the public to have healthcare. You say because "the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle." But many people don't have access to anything. There are millions and millions of uninsured Americans out there. Getting them healthcare, anything, is much more important than everyone in America eating kale salads.

Obviously we should all be working to improve our own health. But many have no chance at even doing that because they can't see a doctor.
 
NO MORAL PARENT on Earth wants their kids to be like Trump.
What a stupid question. Just plain Dumb, offense intended.

EVERY Bible believing Christian I know are voting AGAINST Biden.
There is NO argument with that
Stop engaging this fool. He has zero interest in Christian things. He's just trying to tie you in knots using Alinsky tactics. I promise you he mocks Christians every chance he gets. He has zero clue what a Christian is or how to become one and his only purpose here is to waste your time. You're better off simply blocking this moron.

People like him are just like the Pharisees who would have stoned a woman to death for adultery, but Jesus said let he that is without sin among you cast the first stone...and they all left silently.
 
That's obviously still Big Pharma's fault for paying them. Your post was a response to why you don't want the public to have healthcare. You say because "the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle." But many people don't have access to anything. There are millions and millions of uninsured Americans out there. Getting them healthcare, anything, is much more important than everyone in America eating kale salads.

Obviously we should all be working to improve our own health. But many have no chance at even doing that because they can't see a doctor.

Just a few short years ago, the government mandated people inject themselves with experimental drugs, illegally suppressed all honest discourse about alternative treatments and had its experts mock people for suggesting non pharma alternatives and healthy lifestyle were preferable to the experimental drugs it illegally approved.

The government would absolutely rather you be on pills and drugs - so much so they mandated it.
 
I wondered about the same thing, having seen various posts, tweets, etc ... making this claim, so I researched it. I was intrigued about the claims and found them worthy of looking into. They seemed similar to me and begged questions, comparisons and explanations.

There are many various pieces talking about the differences and legal distinctions between the two (2) situations and how they are not the same. Here is but one, from the AP, but googling, fact-checking and other research will reveal many others.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-clinton-payments-884462275128
 
So...you got nuthin.

If you are trying to be genuine, yur doing a shitty job. If you are mad that you are not taken seriously, then look in the mirror and look at your peers on here.

I cant help you more than that.

Lololololololkl.... deep breath .... lololololklll

I have zero expectation to “be taken seriously” in this thread. I also don’t need to argue with lololol’s and “you’re a retard”.

No amount of that actually answers my initial question.

And that’s because you know if speak honestly you have to cut the agenda hack anonymous internet bullshit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ukalum1988
That's obviously still Big Pharma's fault for paying them. Your post was a response to why you don't want the public to have healthcare. You say because "the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle." But many people don't have access to anything. There are millions and millions of uninsured Americans out there. Getting them healthcare, anything, is much more important than everyone in America eating kale salads.

Obviously we should all be working to improve our own health. But many have no chance at even doing that because they can't see a doctor.

Ha, I DO want the public to have healthcare. I just don’t want to pay for it especially with a constant flow of massive amounts of illegal immigration coming in with no end in sight.

This isn’t Europe. Just the Bay Area alone is similar in population to those small UH countries.
 
Just a few short years ago, the government mandated people inject themselves with experimental drugs, illegally suppressed all honest discourse about alternative treatments and had its experts mock people for suggesting non pharma alternatives and healthy lifestyle were preferable to the experimental drugs it illegally approved.

The government would absolutely rather you be on pills and drugs - so much so they mandated it.

Heck, even bribed you with lap dances, donuts, and cheeseburgers to take it.

Still curious how much of my tax dollars went to Larry Flints Hustler Club to wave some T and A in front of the drunk Vegas folks to jab them.
 
Of course states collect states from their businesses & residents. WTF?

Yes, CA chooses to spend more than WY. That's what I said. So that lowers their percent by the Feds at the same per person spending. And those $ spending amounts aren't all that different.

The Fed spending in a state isn't dependent on their spending level. They don't decide to spend in a state because of the percentage their spending represents to each. I.e., percentage is irrelevant to what the Feds spend.
Amazing.
Who ever woulda thunk that a state with a higher GDP than the United Kingdom would require more spending in its state budget than Wyoming??
I'm shocked.
Funny thing is....they actually spend less federal tax dollars per capita than many red states and send more federal tax dollars to DC than those same red states.
In essence....just another example of the Blue States and Blue Cities that are the economic engines of this country serving as the Big Blue Teet so the red states can have decent roads, schools and medical/social services out in Bumf*** Ky while they sit around the trailor park bitching about the Demoncrats.
(Some 84 percent of federal individual income taxes—which account for over 40 percent of federal revenue—are paid by those in the top 25 percent of the income distribution. The majority of these taxpayers live in wealthy, urban, politically “blue” areas like New York, California, and Massachusetts.)

Here's some light reading to help you understand better....
 
What are you rambling on about?

Oh poor Government…

I was talking about the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle. You don’t think gov and pharma $$$ are attached at the hip?
The Government, big Pharma and big crap food full of corn derivatives and chemicals are all attached at the hip.
 
I wondered about the same thing, having seen various posts, tweets, etc ... making this claim, so I researched it. I was intrigued about the claims and found them worthy of looking into. They seemed similar to me and begged questions, comparisons and explanations.

There are many various pieces talking about the differences and legal distinctions between the two (2) situations and how they are not the same. Here is but one, from the AP, but googling, fact-checking and other research will reveal many others.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-clinton-payments-884462275128

Here's a hint: there are no differences except one is trump. That's literally it.

Politicians paid off oppo news all the time. Never an issue. Until now.

The only other person with an issue iirc was John Edwards who won his case. Speaking of John Edwards, boy he really pissed off the Clintons. Guess it could be worse and end up like their other political foes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDC8888
The FACT that our economy was in the best shape it has been in our lifetime, our foreign policy was strong, small businesses were growing, border was secure, etc. None of the above can be disputed....so yeah, inaccurate.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Facts over memes.


 
Here's the difference. That jury sat there for days in person listening to all the evidence before them.
No TikTok
No X
No Truth Social
They got the evidence....heard the testimony and all 12 jurors found him guilty.
The manipulated are the ones who no longer believe anything that doesn't match the memes they like.

Nothing manufactured about 5 years of lying about the American election system, creating fake electors, asking your VP to violate the Constitution and inciting riots to stop the electoral process.
He's a danger to our democracy that has a cult following.


Yes, it is. Yes, you are brainwashed. They know what they are doing to you, even if you don’t.

Of course they do. One day you’ll know too.

 
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Facts over memes.


Lmao this is the literal definition of "fake news".
 
Here's a hint: there are no differences except one is trump. That's literally it.

Politicians paid off oppo news all the time. Never an issue. Until now.

The only other person with an issue iirc was John Edwards who won his case. Speaking of John Edwards, boy he really pissed off the Clintons. Guess it could be worse and end up like their other political foes.
It is my understanding that Clinton's was a public and legal payment to settle a civil lawsuit in a court proceeding, but I can be wrong, of course. Per the AP article: "By comparison, the payment in Trump’s case was through a shell company and reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses in the final weeks of his 2016 presidential campaign."

Of all the legal cases facing Trump, it has always been my understanding that this case was the weakest for the prosecution to argue. I have no clue whether this is actually the case, or not, as I'm not a lawyer.
I was not expecting guilty on all 34 counts against him. I figured some, but not all. I was surprised by that.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is. Yes, you are brainwashed.
Cool.

Remember when Trump began using words like 'rigged', 'stolen', 'fraud', 'swamp' and phrases like 'massive fraud', 'Sleepy Joe', 'Crooked Joe', and 'Crooked Hillary' every day...and hours later posters began copying him and using those same words and phrases as if trained to? Yeah, I also don't remember folks here constantly using all those words and phrases on a daily basis right after Donald used them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MidseasonTweak
Fact News....
Cool article lol

Even their article on Biden admits that a global pandemic hurt jobs under Trump, that Biden lied about Trump not being able to create jobs and Biden lied about inflation rates

 
I wondered about the same thing, having seen various posts, tweets, etc ... making this claim, so I researched it. I was intrigued about the claims and found them worthy of looking into. They seemed similar to me and begged questions, comparisons and explanations.

There are many various pieces talking about the differences and legal distinctions between the two (2) situations and how they are not the same. Here is but one, from the AP, but googling, fact-checking and other research will reveal many others.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-clinton-payments-884462275128
It is a dumb comparison, comparing apples and oranges. Clinton violated the woman, Trump was extorted and paid her to go away.
I’d like to know what “ shell company” you’re fact check is saying Trump used? Also, it seems to me if Trump was truly trying to break campaign finance laws he’d have just paid Cohen in cash so there wouldn’t be a trail, but he probably thought it wasn’t a campaign fund and he assumed at worst he’d get a fine like every other God Damn politician in history .
 
Cool.

Remember when Trump began using words like 'rigged', 'stolen', 'fraud', 'swamp' and phrases like 'massive fraud', 'Sleepy Joe', 'Crooked Joe', and 'Crooked Hillary' every day...and hours later posters began copying him and using those same words and phrases as if trained to? Yeah, I also don't remember folks here constantly using all those words and phrases on a daily basis right after Donald used them.
Trump know what he’s doing too. Also even if you don’t.

You don’t.
 
It is my understanding that Clinton's was a public and legal payment to settle a civil lawsuit in a court proceeding, but I can be wrong, of course. Per the AP article: "By comparison, the payment in Trump’s case was through a shell company and reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses in the final weeks of his 2016 presidential campaign."

Of all the legal cases facing Trump, it has always been my understanding that this case was the weakest for the prosecution to argue. I have no clue whether this is actually the case, or not, as I'm not a lawyer.
I was not expecting guilty on all 34 counts against him. I figured some, but not all. I was surprised by that.
An NDA isn’t a legal issue?
 
It is a dumb comparison, comparing apples and oranges. Clinton violated the woman, Trump was extorted and paid her to go away.
I’d like to know what “ shell company” you’re fact check is saying Trump used? Also, it seems to me if Trump was truly trying to break campaign finance laws he’d have just paid Cohen in cash so there wouldn’t be a trail, but he probably thought it wasn’t a campaign fund and he assumed at worst he’d get a fine like every other God Damn politician in history .
The Clinton campaign and DNC got a $105k fine for creating a fake spy report which detailed russian hookers pissing on Trump. Joe Biden in a presidential debate claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation. He also boasted on camera of withholding funding to Ukraine if they didn’t fire the prosecutor investing the oil company his son was employed by. He also claimed he had no knowledge of his sons business dealings nor profited from them yet there are multiple checks sent to his home coinciding with a foreign deal his brother and son had just finished. These facts will not be forgotten when Trump is re-elected. I don’t think Trump will appoint a Washington lifer as AG this go around. The precedent has been set.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT