S&P 500 📈 on the day on good news. Markets like a convicted Trump. Not surprising since he tanked a thriving economy.
Why don't we just go ahead and build them missle silos? May be cheaper and more safe for the little terroists in training in their so-called schools.Not sure if this was mentioned earlier about Biden's remarks:
Won't rebuild parts of our own country though
did you just finish your chores? Good boy. Keep it up, it is a long summer.Guy on internet who types lolololol like it's AOL in 1997. Let's see how many internet cliches we can hit. Maybe next you can compare Biden to Hitler and type the term "communist" in exchange for Democrats. lolololol
S&P 500 📈 on the day on good news. Markets like a convicted Trump. Not surprising since he tanked a thriving economy.
did you just finish your chores? Good boy. Keep it up, it is a long summer.
Still havent heard from you a reason why christians should vote for china joe. Until you provide good thoughtful reasons, the record isnt good for you. Many folks have provided reasons to NOT vote for him. Genuinely.
lol, you’re a clueless commie.
What evidence did the prosecutors present that was a good job?
Be specific lol (I know you won’t, because you are clueless commie, just like your pride flag loving “buddy” Nightwish)
That's obviously still Big Pharma's fault for paying them. Your post was a response to why you don't want the public to have healthcare. You say because "the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle." But many people don't have access to anything. There are millions and millions of uninsured Americans out there. Getting them healthcare, anything, is much more important than everyone in America eating kale salads.What are you rambling on about?
Oh poor Government…
I was talking about the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle. You don’t think gov and pharma $$$ are attached at the hip?
So...you got nuthin.
Stop engaging this fool. He has zero interest in Christian things. He's just trying to tie you in knots using Alinsky tactics. I promise you he mocks Christians every chance he gets. He has zero clue what a Christian is or how to become one and his only purpose here is to waste your time. You're better off simply blocking this moron.NO MORAL PARENT on Earth wants their kids to be like Trump.
What a stupid question. Just plain Dumb, offense intended.
EVERY Bible believing Christian I know are voting AGAINST Biden.
There is NO argument with that
That's obviously still Big Pharma's fault for paying them. Your post was a response to why you don't want the public to have healthcare. You say because "the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle." But many people don't have access to anything. There are millions and millions of uninsured Americans out there. Getting them healthcare, anything, is much more important than everyone in America eating kale salads.
Obviously we should all be working to improve our own health. But many have no chance at even doing that because they can't see a doctor.
I wondered about the same thing, having seen various posts, tweets, etc ... making this claim, so I researched it. I was intrigued about the claims and found them worthy of looking into. They seemed similar to me and begged questions, comparisons and explanations.
So...you got nuthin.
If you are trying to be genuine, yur doing a shitty job. If you are mad that you are not taken seriously, then look in the mirror and look at your peers on here.
I cant help you more than that.
Lololololololkl.... deep breath .... lololololklll
That's obviously still Big Pharma's fault for paying them. Your post was a response to why you don't want the public to have healthcare. You say because "the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle." But many people don't have access to anything. There are millions and millions of uninsured Americans out there. Getting them healthcare, anything, is much more important than everyone in America eating kale salads.
Obviously we should all be working to improve our own health. But many have no chance at even doing that because they can't see a doctor.
Just a few short years ago, the government mandated people inject themselves with experimental drugs, illegally suppressed all honest discourse about alternative treatments and had its experts mock people for suggesting non pharma alternatives and healthy lifestyle were preferable to the experimental drugs it illegally approved.
The government would absolutely rather you be on pills and drugs - so much so they mandated it.
Amazing.Of course states collect states from their businesses & residents. WTF?
Yes, CA chooses to spend more than WY. That's what I said. So that lowers their percent by the Feds at the same per person spending. And those $ spending amounts aren't all that different.
The Fed spending in a state isn't dependent on their spending level. They don't decide to spend in a state because of the percentage their spending represents to each. I.e., percentage is irrelevant to what the Feds spend.
The Government, big Pharma and big crap food full of corn derivatives and chemicals are all attached at the hip.What are you rambling on about?
Oh poor Government…
I was talking about the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle. You don’t think gov and pharma $$$ are attached at the hip?
The Government, big Pharma and big crap food full of corn derivatives and chemicals are all attached at the hip.
I wondered about the same thing, having seen various posts, tweets, etc ... making this claim, so I researched it. I was intrigued about the claims and found them worthy of looking into. They seemed similar to me and begged questions, comparisons and explanations.
There are many various pieces talking about the differences and legal distinctions between the two (2) situations and how they are not the same. Here is but one, from the AP, but googling, fact-checking and other research will reveal many others.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-clinton-payments-884462275128
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂The FACT that our economy was in the best shape it has been in our lifetime, our foreign policy was strong, small businesses were growing, border was secure, etc. None of the above can be disputed....so yeah, inaccurate.
That's a fact and it's pathetic our nation allows it's population to literally be poisoned.The Government, big Pharma and big crap food full of corn derivatives and chemicals are all attached at the hip.
Here's the difference. That jury sat there for days in person listening to all the evidence before them.
No TikTok
No X
No Truth Social
They got the evidence....heard the testimony and all 12 jurors found him guilty.
The manipulated are the ones who no longer believe anything that doesn't match the memes they like.
Nothing manufactured about 5 years of lying about the American election system, creating fake electors, asking your VP to violate the Constitution and inciting riots to stop the electoral process.
He's a danger to our democracy that has a cult following.
Zeihan is great but he’s way too elevated for many hereInteresting take from someone who is definitely not a leftist. He has been linked before here by the right-wingers in fact:
Lmao this is the literal definition of "fake news".😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Facts over memes.
![]()
Trump Leaving Office With 3 Million Less Jobs Than When He Entered
Trump has the worst jobs record of any president since Herbert Hoover in 1933.www.newsweek.com
![]()
Trump to leave office with the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover
The number of employed Americans fell by 3 million during Trump's time in office.finance.yahoo.com
![]()
GDP growth under Trump was worst since Hoover
The former president’s claim that he created the ‘greatest economy in the world’ is a fantasywww.the-independent.com
I’m not sure it was proven he lied on a ledger. And paying off porn stars to keep quiet is illegal?Let’s say this trial never took place. Any one think Trump did anything wrong by lying on ledgers and paying off porn stars to be quiet on affairs? Or is that a lie too? I’ll hang up and listen.
It is my understanding that Clinton's was a public and legal payment to settle a civil lawsuit in a court proceeding, but I can be wrong, of course. Per the AP article: "By comparison, the payment in Trump’s case was through a shell company and reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses in the final weeks of his 2016 presidential campaign."Here's a hint: there are no differences except one is trump. That's literally it.
Politicians paid off oppo news all the time. Never an issue. Until now.
The only other person with an issue iirc was John Edwards who won his case. Speaking of John Edwards, boy he really pissed off the Clintons. Guess it could be worse and end up like their other political foes.
Cool.Yes, it is. Yes, you are brainwashed.
Fact News....Lmao this is the literal definition of "fake news".
Didn't hurt Mandela much back in the day either. I don't suspect this will hurt big Don at all. And because of that, the next step the america haters take will be something else.😂 Trump is still the frontrunner for the presidency despite a Biden/Stalin DOJ kangaroo court convictions haha
You certainly hope that's the case.😂 Trump is still the frontrunner for the presidency despite a Biden/Stalin DOJ kangaroo court convictions haha
Cool article lolFact News....
![]()
Trump's Final Numbers - FactCheck.org
Statistical indicators of President Trump's four years in office.www.factcheck.org
It is a dumb comparison, comparing apples and oranges. Clinton violated the woman, Trump was extorted and paid her to go away.I wondered about the same thing, having seen various posts, tweets, etc ... making this claim, so I researched it. I was intrigued about the claims and found them worthy of looking into. They seemed similar to me and begged questions, comparisons and explanations.
There are many various pieces talking about the differences and legal distinctions between the two (2) situations and how they are not the same. Here is but one, from the AP, but googling, fact-checking and other research will reveal many others.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-clinton-payments-884462275128
Trump know what he’s doing too. Also even if you don’t.Cool.
Remember when Trump began using words like 'rigged', 'stolen', 'fraud', 'swamp' and phrases like 'massive fraud', 'Sleepy Joe', 'Crooked Joe', and 'Crooked Hillary' every day...and hours later posters began copying him and using those same words and phrases as if trained to? Yeah, I also don't remember folks here constantly using all those words and phrases on a daily basis right after Donald used them.
An NDA isn’t a legal issue?It is my understanding that Clinton's was a public and legal payment to settle a civil lawsuit in a court proceeding, but I can be wrong, of course. Per the AP article: "By comparison, the payment in Trump’s case was through a shell company and reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses in the final weeks of his 2016 presidential campaign."
Of all the legal cases facing Trump, it has always been my understanding that this case was the weakest for the prosecution to argue. I have no clue whether this is actually the case, or not, as I'm not a lawyer.
I was not expecting guilty on all 34 counts against him. I figured some, but not all. I was surprised by that.
The Clinton campaign and DNC got a $105k fine for creating a fake spy report which detailed russian hookers pissing on Trump. Joe Biden in a presidential debate claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation. He also boasted on camera of withholding funding to Ukraine if they didn’t fire the prosecutor investing the oil company his son was employed by. He also claimed he had no knowledge of his sons business dealings nor profited from them yet there are multiple checks sent to his home coinciding with a foreign deal his brother and son had just finished. These facts will not be forgotten when Trump is re-elected. I don’t think Trump will appoint a Washington lifer as AG this go around. The precedent has been set.It is a dumb comparison, comparing apples and oranges. Clinton violated the woman, Trump was extorted and paid her to go away.
I’d like to know what “ shell company” you’re fact check is saying Trump used? Also, it seems to me if Trump was truly trying to break campaign finance laws he’d have just paid Cohen in cash so there wouldn’t be a trail, but he probably thought it wasn’t a campaign fund and he assumed at worst he’d get a fine like every other God Damn politician in history .