ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
On a lighter note, the Dems pursuit of destroying the economy because of their climate change religion is ramping up.





Can’t wait to see all those liberals with the “my car climbed Mt Washington” bumper sticker sitting at home because oil companies declined to deliver gas to VT in a protest against this asinine law.
 
Wrong again. California and other blue states collect taxes from the businesses and people in their state.
No matter how you try and spin your BS, California's percentage of it's entire state budget used for all the roads, schools, services is covered at a higher percentage BY CALIFORNIA than Wyoming's is.
Why is that so difficult for you to comprehend?? Do you even understand what that means???
Let me explain in simple terms for you. Basically, the federal government subsidizes every state government with a certain percentage of their entire state budget.
The states themselves cover part of it via their own collections and the feds contribute the rest.
If 30 percent of Ky's state budget comes from federal funds and California gets 14.5 percent of its budget from federal funds....that means California is paying for ITS OWN roads, schools, services with half as much help from the federal government as Ky is using.

Red State Federal Aide Teet suckers:

Hope you better understand this not very complex topic better now.
You are also not factoring in the huge amount of federal $$$$ Cali is paying into the system vs a cow patch in Wyoming.
Of course states collect states from their businesses & residents. WTF?

Yes, CA chooses to spend more than WY. That's what I said. So that lowers their percent by the Feds at the same per person spending. And those $ spending amounts aren't all that different.

The Fed spending in a state isn't dependent on their spending level. They don't decide to spend in a state because of the percentage their spending represents to each. I.e., percentage is irrelevant to what the Feds spend.
 
Agree just so many unknown odd things in this case.
You don't go to the unprecedented lengths, and use the type of lawfare this DA and Judge used (at the behest of the Biden admin and funded by Soros) when there are actual legitimate charges. Those tactics are used to pre-determine an outcome. Trump in no way whatsoever received a fair trial.
 
Well KAB has certainly upped the number of posts on this thread. Gives MAGA someone besides dion & sam to spar with. Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
You are in no way obligated to vote for Biden or Trump. I am merely asking how one reconciles Christian views with Donald Trump's behavior. I don't understand why his behavior would be justified because of Joe Biden. Do commandments change based on political opponents?

I do think, with little debate, that in terms of personal conduct, clearly Donald Trump's behavior is not normal or the standard for past presidents (or for people in general). You could argue Bill Clinton was close. I think there are some similarities in terms of sexual conduct, but the GOP also tried to impeach Bill Clinton under the banner of family values much less than Trump has been found guilty of (in multiiple trials).

This, to me, is why conservativism with Donald Trump is dead and I think that's a hard pill for the religious right to swallow. Takes away from any kind of moral high ground or more accurately exposes that this high ground was always a deception from the beginning.
Told you guys this would be fun

Lololololol

Genuine my ass
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Dallas-Wild
Our society in general doesn’t promote things like eating healthy, exercise, and sunlight. Our food is unhealthy unless you’re wealthy and our water supply is loaded with chemicals.

Government is to blame as much as anyone in this regard. They’d rather you take pills and shots your whole life than support the obvious with the prior. I don’t think giving them more control is the answer.
That's complete bull, the government even gives healthy eating advice that everyone thinks is cringe and then grabs a candy bar on the way to McDonald's. That is capitalism's fault, not the freaking government. You think it's the government's responsibility to control what everyone eats and how much they exercise? That's ridiculous authoritarian crap man. EVERYTHING IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT. You even admit it's society's fault in your own opening line but then somehow still turn that on the government.
 
That's complete bull, the government even gives healthy eating advice that everyone thinks is cringe and then grabs a candy bar on the way to McDonald's. That is capitalism's fault, not the freaking government. You think it's the government's responsibility to control what everyone eats and how much they exercise? That's ridiculous authoritarian crap man. EVERYTHING IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT. You even admit it's society's fault in your own opening line but then somehow still turn that on the government.
^^^^^self own^^^^^

...and its hilarious.
 
That's complete bull, the government even gives healthy eating advice that everyone thinks is cringe and then grabs a candy bar on the way to McDonald's. That is capitalism's fault, not the freaking government. You think it's the government's responsibility to control what everyone eats and how much they exercise? That's ridiculous authoritarian crap man. EVERYTHING IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT. You even admit it's society's fault in your own opening line but then somehow still turn that on the government.


lol
 
The GREAT news is, as with anything, especially politics, you don't have to believe anyone, you can simply do the research on your own!!! Which part of my post did you not believe? That 27 million more votes were cast in 2020 than in 2016 or that 27 million is the same as the entire combined population of the 17 states I listed? FTR, spell checks are the weakest form of debate, it is indicative of a brain incapable of forming an argument against the topic, so it tries to discredit the message by dicrediting the messanger. That never works, "Duh Son, WIL, RIZE. TUHmorrow", nothing about the spelling, punctuation, or capitalization of the words refute the absolute truth that the sun will indeed rise tomorrow, and in fact I would consider myself less than genius for not believing it will happen because it was spelled incorrectly. But anyway, 27 million more votes were cast in 2020 than in 2016, and that is the same amount as the total population of the 17 states I listed, COMBINED. And you have to believe that happened in order to not doubt the results. And, you can easily verify those statistics, I encourage you to, with everything.
How is that hard to believe? We have generally low turnout in most elections. In 2016 it was roughly 59% of the voting-eligible population. In 2020 we had a unique situation where voting access was expanded due to the pandemic. Turnout still only increased about 8% to roughly 67%. We had had around 63% just a few elections earlier in 2008. Not far-fetched in the slightest. Between 2016 and 2020 the voting-eligible population itself increased by around 9 million. That's almost half twenty-some million votes right there.
 
That's complete bull, the government even gives healthy eating advice that everyone thinks is cringe and then grabs a candy bar on the way to McDonald's. That is capitalism's fault, not the freaking government. You think it's the government's responsibility to control what everyone eats and how much they exercise? That's ridiculous authoritarian crap man. EVERYTHING IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT. You even admit it's society's fault in your own opening line but then somehow still turn that on the government.

What are you rambling on about?

Oh poor Government…

I was talking about the GOV rather you be on pills and taking shots than living a healthy lifestyle. You don’t think gov and pharma $$$ are attached at the hip?
 
To be clear, you're voting for the President of the United States, the most recognizable person in the world, whose purpose as president is to set precedents for the most powerful & influential country in the world. And my question, which I'll ask one last time, is how someone with devout Christian views reconciles these views with someone who not only a history of immoral behavior, but who also refuses to take any responsibility for said behavior. Would you want your children to act like Donald Trump?
NO MORAL PARENT on Earth wants their kids to be like Trump.
What a stupid question. Just plain Dumb, offense intended.

EVERY Bible believing Christian I know are voting AGAINST Biden.
There is NO argument with that
 
Every single thing you ascribe to him is your OPINION of his actions. Not one of those things is more than your thoughts on what has occurred.

In reality, though, there’s this: Who has weaponized law? Who opens the borders? Who ignores SCOTUS rulings? Who threatens to pack the court and destroy the Senate? Who destroys the currency? Who says nothing when federal agencies are caught spying on a candidate, or promoting hoaxes about Russia, or lying about the origins of a laptop in order to influence an election?

And you talk about the Constitution. You all have moved the country one giant step towards dissolution with this. Since law now means nothing, I can only hope that you yourself are tried and convicted in similar circumstances as him.

Because that is what you’ve allowed to happen.
And who allowed a peaceful transition of power already?

His "argument" is stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr2
I have never in my life met a person who thought OJ was innocent.
Until now.

You’ve really made a wild lead here. Hope you landed OK. HTF do you assume I thought OJ was innocent? Prosecutors did a terrible job of proving the evidence, so jurors found OJ not guilty. Prosecutors in Trumps trial did a good job of proving the evidence and jurors found him guilty. The system worked exactly as it was designed in both cases.
 
I
I am not a lawyer and and have followed the case some, but not in depth enough to fully-understand it.

Several things that I do not get are:

1) If the Administration in Washington has as much influence over court cases as has been claimed, then how was Cohen tried and convicted in 2018 ?? In December 2018, Cohen was sentenced to three years in federal prison and ordered to pay a $50,000 fine. In February 2019, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, disbarred him from practicing law in the state. In May 2019, he reported to the federal prison near Otisville, New York.

2) Why didn't Trump's defense bring more witnesses to the stand to dispute the facts and evidence presented by the prosecution ?? They claimed Cohen lied and could not be trusted, I definitely get that, but it does not appear that they ever presented arguments to prove that Trump was not involved in directing the events.

3) Why didn't Trump take the stand to refute the prosecution claims and prove his innocence ??

4) If providing someone hush money is not a crime, as I've read where legal experts say it's not, why didn't Trump just pay Stormy Daniels with a personal check and be done with her ?? Why all the intermediaries ??

These are very simple questions I have and may be very naive and easily explained ... but what are peoples' thoughts on these ???
And i Wonder why the biden crime family has sooooo many offshore shell accounts amd corporations. I wonder what they are hiding?
 
Told you guys this would be fun

Lololololol

Genuine my ass

Guy on internet who types lolololol like it's AOL in 1997. Let's see how many internet cliches we can hit. Maybe next you can compare Biden to Hitler and type the term "communist" in exchange for Democrats. lolololol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
You’ve really made a wild lead here. Hope you landed OK. HTF do you assume I thought OJ was innocent? Prosecutors did a terrible job of proving the evidence, so jurors found OJ not guilty. Prosecutors in Trumps trial did a good job of proving the evidence and jurors found him guilty. The system worked exactly as it was designed in both cases.

lol, you’re a clueless commie.

What evidence did the prosecutors present that was a good job?

Be specific lol (I know you won’t, because you are clueless commie, just like your pride flag loving “buddy” Nightwish)
 
You’ve really made a wild lead here. Hope you landed OK. HTF do you assume I thought OJ was innocent? Prosecutors did a terrible job of proving the evidence, so jurors found OJ not guilty. Prosecutors in Trumps trial did a good job of proving the evidence and jurors found him guilty. The system worked exactly as it was designed in both cases.

Hilarious! 😂
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
That's complete bull, the government even gives healthy eating advice that everyone thinks is cringe and then grabs a candy bar on the way to McDonald's. That is capitalism's fault, not the freaking government. You think it's the government's responsibility to control what everyone eats and how much they exercise? That's ridiculous authoritarian crap man. EVERYTHING IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S FAULT. You even admit it's society's fault in your own opening line but then somehow still turn that on the government.
Oh wow....LMAO.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
You’ve really made a wild lead here. Hope you landed OK. HTF do you assume I thought OJ was innocent? Prosecutors did a terrible job of proving the evidence, so jurors found OJ not guilty. Prosecutors in Trumps trial did a good job of proving the evidence and jurors found him guilty. The system worked exactly as it was designed in both cases.
And oh wow...LMAO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT