ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Good grief Brandon... 5 clip edits in a total of 14 seconds of video for you to issue your teleprompter guided, middle schoolish debate challenge to Trump?!? Just pathetic. Who in the White House staff thought it was a good idea to make this video, much less release it after it got all spliced together?

This reeks of some desperation setting in at the White House as they watch the swing state polls continue to slide in the wrong direction for the D team. I can't imagine they really WANT to put Biden in these debates. But they probably figure they have no choice at this point, so their plan is to dictate all of the ground rules to try to be as favorable as possible for Biden.

Democrats are looking for ANY REASON to vote for Biden, and any reason not to vote for anything else. Doesn't matter what it is. Could be mandating cheaper soft drink prices and discounts on Disney streaming fees.
 


you-dont-say-frowning.gif
 

Biden's Commerce Secretary Confirms That More Illegal Immigrants Means More Power for Democrats​

Like I've been saying for years, illegals give Dims more seats without even voting. It's why it takes less votes to win Dim congressional seats. Take a look at vote totals for each seat across the country some time.

"... illegal aliens — generally drawn to sanctuary cities and sanctuary states (read: Democrat locales) — mean there is a surge of individuals running up the "population" numbers in blue areas which, due to the census, results in more congressional seats for blue states and in turn more votes in the electoral college."

Of course MAGA here thinks I like that, LOL. Bunch of goofuses.

 
I am sorry you are so unhappy and apparently angry. Truly. But, this was your response to what you now apparently admit is lawful use of an LLC which you now characterize as a “loophole” (I am not going down a rabbit hole with you about that characterization):



You now admit that it is not “cheating” or unlawful.

If this message site makes so upset that you feel the need to say such things, get away. Do yourself that favor.
It should be. That's the point. He's a criminal, and he and his criminal cronies have rigged our laws for themselves and against everyday Americans. If something looks bad on the sheets you shouldn't be able to hide it in another LLC. That's wrong, immoral behavior, whether currently legal or not. It's cheating, and just like the example I gave, if a poor person did the same everyone here would see that immorality. But if a rich person does it then it's clever and virtuous. Bullshit. MAGA are fake populist bootlickers.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lost In FL
He just trolls, but this one seemed like all of this was new info to him. He has all of the knowledge of someone who can’t itemize past the standard deduction.


Why have taxes at all? Aoc says the government can just print more money. She says fedgov just borrows money on paper from itself.

Why do they need mine?


He’s true to his commie roots. The only crime he views as punishable by law is over money.
I know what it is. Apparently conceptually better than you do. It's intentionally taking activity that should be taxed a certain way and obfuscating the information surrounding it so it's taxed less. It is wrong. And as I said from my very first post on the topic, illustrates just what a sad state our country is in that such a thing is legal to those who can afford it. The inmates run the asylum(the bourgeois write the tax code).
 
True story. Helped my brother clean out a rental property he owns after a nasty renter. Got my son to help out. At one point my son came up to us and said, "Dad, where do you want me to put this dog chew toy? Keep it or throw it away? I said, son....depends on whether or not you wanna be the proud owner of a used pocket pu**y."
He had no idea wth it was. 🤣
We still laugh about that day even though he's a grown ass man now.
 
** KA -- BOOM **


WTF???? All the "smart" Dems in this thread swore non-citizen voters is a GOP-engineered myth.
137 people after an entire investigation into it! The horror!!!! Consider my pearls clutched with you, Austin my friend. This is definitely evidence that "millions of illegals voted" like Trump has repeatedly said. I mean if we multiply 137(just registered, not voted, but don't worry about that) by 50 you get many millions right? Definitely not a miniscule, irrelevant few thousand across an entire country of hundreds of millions...

(Kaboom)
 
Apples and oranges Dion. The “loopholes” are there and it’s not immoral or “criminal” to use them in order to keep from sending any more of your hard earned money to the wasteful Government than you should. People who do that are harming or affecting no one. It IS immoral though to purposely exploit the wasteful Government that we all pay our taxes to in order to bilk us taxpayers out of more money than they deserve because they choose not to be productive members of society. That’s theft by definition, but it’s a loophole so not illegal, but it is immoral. I have a legal obligation to pay my taxes not a moral obligation. I’m not “stealing” anything by using loopholes. But it all doesn’t matter. You want everyone equally poor and beholden to the government.

What’s your proposed tax plan? What would be a fair tax plan with no loopholes to exploit for everyone? Lay it out for us.
I tell ya what would be a more useful use of people’s time than fretting over what your neighbor is paying in taxes. Getting an accounting of what their government is doing with all that tax money.
 


It is truly amazing how little people seem to care about crimes against children. Let a school shooting happen and they'll yap about banning guns but let a couple hundred thousand kids go missing to sex trafficking and it's crickets.
If given the choice, I'd rather my daughter die in a shooting than to be sold into sex slavery. The only reason dems scream and yell about these school shootings is because it eliminates some of their targets for sex slaves.
 
137 people after an entire investigation into it! The horror!!!! Consider my pearls clutched with you, Austin my friend. This is definitely evidence that "millions of illegals voted" like Trump has repeatedly said. I mean if we multiply 137(just registered, not voted, but don't worry about that) by 50 you get many millions right? Definitely not a miniscule, irrelevant few thousand across an entire country of hundreds of millions...

(Kaboom)
One is too many.
 
I know what it is. Apparently conceptually better than you do. It's intentionally taking activity that should be taxed a certain way and obfuscating the information surrounding it so it's taxed less. It is wrong. And as I said from my very first post on the topic, illustrates just what a sad state our country is in that such a thing is legal to those who can afford it. The inmates run the asylum(the bourgeois write the tax code).

What did anyone say to make you think they’re obfuscating information so as to be taxed less?
 
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr2
One is too many.

Yep. But democrats are blown whichever way the wind takes their rainbow skirts. One day they ignore one person's claims with proof of fraud, assault, or destroying evidence because "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" and the next day they're holding the country hostage because one person said they were "assaulted" without proof or complaint at the time 20+ years ago with chants of "me, too" everywhere. They wouldn't be anything if they weren't hypocrites and frauds.
 
If given the choice, I'd rather my daughter die in a shooting than to be sold into sex slavery. The only reason dems scream and yell about these school shootings is because it eliminates some of their targets for sex slaves.

Bullseye
 
I know what it is. Apparently conceptually better than you do. It's intentionally taking activity that should be taxed a certain way and obfuscating the information surrounding it so it's taxed less. It is wrong. And as I said from my very first post on the topic, illustrates just what a sad state our country is in that such a thing is legal to those who can afford it. The inmates run the asylum(the bourgeois write the tax code).
If you made sound financial decisions in your life, like obtaining a marketable degree and setting yourself up with a solid career path that doesn't involve pulverizing coal for the rest of your life, or until it's banned, then You too could have benefitted from these tax loopholes. I'm sure you would have done the Right moral thing though and shelled far more of your income over to the Government if you had the chance though right?

You still haven't told us what YOUR ideal tax plan looks like, one that's fair and equitable to everyone. Please let us in on what that would be.
 
I know what it is. Apparently conceptually better than you do. It's intentionally taking activity that should be taxed a certain way and obfuscating the information surrounding it so it's taxed less. It is wrong. And as I said from my very first post on the topic, illustrates just what a sad state our country is in that such a thing is legal to those who can afford it. The inmates run the asylum(the bourgeois write the tax code).
False.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Good "kid" and interivew. Nice to see people of integrity with a platform standing up to the radical left's nonsense. His total demolition of Pelosi at Oxford Union was a real joy to witness. If you find yourself still oblivious as to what is actually going on after watching that then there's likely no hope for you.

 
@Dionysus444 @sambowieshin I thought you guys said the court was illegitimate and Clarence Thomas who wrote the opinion was bought by conservative billionaires?....or they follow the constitution, you just don't like it when you don't get what you want. Tough day for ppl like Liz to not look like hypocrites

I never said any of that. They have conservative views that I sometimes agree with and other times don't.
I am very conservative on crime/punishment but very liberal on my views on abortion/bodily autonomy.
Even though I don't like the overturning of Roe, I get that states can decide this. Don't like it, but doesn't mean I think it is an illegitimate court.
 
They aren't tax loopholes. They're tax LAWS/CODE, and most of them have been written/passed/endorsed by Democrats. (Since Democrats have held the majority of power for the last 60 years...) That's right Dems/Leftists, you have only your side to blame.

I posted a breakdown of political party power during my lifetime, starting with 1964, and the NEW Democratic party. I don't really want to look it all up again, so just take my word for it. But (sigh), I WILL if I HAVE to.

Actually, I won't, you all can search my posts in this forum for the last 6 months.

Fax mentis incendium gloria culpum, et cetera, et cetera . . . memo bis punitor delicatum! It's ALL there, black and white! Clear as CRYSTAL!

 
Last edited:
I know what it is. Apparently conceptually better than you do. It's intentionally taking activity that should be taxed a certain way and obfuscating the information surrounding it so it's taxed less. It is wrong. And as I said from my very first post on the topic, illustrates just what a sad state our country is in that such a thing is legal to those who can afford it. The inmates run the asylum(the bourgeois write the tax code).

The Sanders Warren wing has had both congress amd the executive multiple times last 16 years.

Why didn't they change the tax code?

Oh, right. Same reason they never wrote abortion legislation.

They want to bitch and moan, and rely on sycophants such as yourself to carry their water, while never doing a dam thing except enriching themselves.

Find a new party, Dion.
 
He said this:

"Bonding companies look at our financials", but those balance sheets are "clean because we rent." He admits he owns both but passes it through for tax purposes. Tax purposes being paying less. Like I said, our society is beyond broken when we allow this sort of loophole nonsense, and as seen here not just allow, but think of it as normal and openly brag about as he is. It's evil, if it were someone on welfare abusing loopholes to get more out of the system y'all'd call them scum and want them locked up and the key thrown away, but since it's the petite bourgeois instead of poor people it's totally fine. Clever even. The moral inconsistency of it all is grotesque.
There is no such thing as a loophole. It is clearly tax law. Its the LAW. You personally can pay more tax than is mandated by tax law. Do you? Do you overpay so you can do your part to reduce the debt? To allow for freebies for illegals? If you don't you are immoral an grotesque.

Again, your ignorance of the tax code and business speaks volumes. There are millions of folks who receive reported income on a W2 and others via a K1. I am an EMPLOYEE in one company and receive a W2. I am a partner and receive income etc... in the other company on a K1. That is how the law works. That is why I and other small business INVEST and CREATE jobs for others. You are a drain on society. You should be ashamed.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT