Where would activists get so many pressure vests? Surely not from the very unbiased MSM. Definitely not.
No, it's nonsense because it's nonsense. There is no Q, there is no cabal of adrenochrome-abusing baby-torturers. Trump is not the secret president, Hillary has not been arrested, JFK Jr is not alive and poised to become Trump's VP, and Obama is not in Gitmo. Q consistently makes predictions that never come true. Yet the inclinations of the movement inevitably percolate out into the wider rightwing mediasphere.
More from Joe Biden's Amerika: "American consumers are dividing their food shopping among more stores to save money as inflation continues to upend household budgets. " -- WSJ
I love the Cop tackling the soyboy leftist. The lefty was thinking...."wait, this never happened to me in soccer. That is why mommy never let me play football".
I'd hope they'd be full bore on anyone who shot their dog.So noem must be the VP choice? Because MSM and socials is full bore on her.
Could care less if somebody shot their dog, hell we’ve killed everything from gators to birds 🍺I'd hope they'd be full bore on anyone who shot their dog.
I'd hope they'd be full bore on anyone who shot their dog.
But viable human babies... that is okay.I'd hope they'd be full bore on anyone who shot their dog.
That sounds like a character from Gunsmoke.And here, mods delete "Fart Faggard (referencing the weasel Marc Maggard).
Deport, please.
It's from her own book, she put it out there herself. Just came out, hence the hullabaloo. She shot a 14 month old puppy because it annoyed her.I haven't seen anything about the underlying story just the usual media matters attack pattern.
It's from her own book, she put it out there herself. Just came out, hence the hullabaloo. She shot a 14 month old puppy because it annoyed her.
One of my Doberman died of bloat.I'd have to see the text itself in full context. I have a hard time believing she killed a puppy because it annoyed her. There are merciful reasons country folk kill pets that have nothing to do with hate.
And no, not everywhere had vets especially back then especially in a rural area. So just putting them to sleep was not an option. If you don't do it, the mother will. Pretty eye opening to see a mother eat a runt or sick pup to ensure the litter has maximum chance to make it.
My guess is that's what is in the book and the usual suspects are intentionally twisting it.
Read it for yourself, it wasn't sick or any of the other nonsense you're needlessly speculating about.I'd have to see the text itself in full context. I have a hard time believing she killed a puppy because it annoyed her. There are merciful reasons country folk kill pets that have nothing to do with hate.
And no, not everywhere had vets especially back then especially in a rural area. So just putting them to sleep was not an option. If you don't do it, the mother will. Pretty eye opening to see a mother eat a runt or sick pup to ensure the litter has maximum chance to make it.
My guess is that's what is in the book and the usual suspects are intentionally twisting it.
I haven't seen anything about the underlying story just the usual media matters attack pattern.
This is fully warranted. She wrote about killing a misbehaving dog in her book, then doubled down on X.
At least she didn’t eat it like Obama though.
So for once the media matters cabal was not twisting and spinning nonsense? Was it misbehaving in an aggressive way? I'm trying to make sense of a presumably savvy politician writing such a thing in a book.