ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
  • Like
Reactions: JoeSwag
All the Trump slurpers like to ignore the fact that Kushner and Soros have been partners for a long time. It doesn't fit their conspiracy narratives
mb2rgl3j3k791.png
 
Do you actually think there's a rural area in the United States that rivals St Louis?
Rate, maybe. Numbers, of course not. One murder in a small county is a huge rate. I mean Uvalde County has 27,000 people. I consider that rural. 21 murders creates a rate higher than any city on that list at 77.7/100K.
 
Last edited:
Keith Olbermann on twitter yesterday was referring to Amy Coney Barrett as "the paralegal", which many of his followers seemed to love and justify because ACB has "never tried a case". That is so offensive on so many different levels and speaks to a complete lack of understanding of the practice of law. Many lawyers, and a number of appellate court judges, are not trial lawyers.
Neither are most patent & corporate lawyers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: augustaky1
Rate, maybe. Numbers, of course not. One murder in a small county is a huge rate. I mean Uvalde County has 27,000 people. I consider that rural. 21 murders creates a rate higher than any city on that list at 77.7/100K.
Over a sustained period then. And it's not redneck gun owner shooting each other for the most part.
 
Watching the nut cases come not ought to be fun. Take you lawn chairs to their rallies and enjoy.
 
You do realize it's blue areas in the red states with the high crime?
No, he doesn't understand that. He also fails to mention the demographic that commits the overwhelming amount of crime.

I've shown the correlation between race and crime stats. The more "diversity", the more crime a place has. The more white, less crime. It cannot be argued.
 


Headlines like this, and they're all like this, are intentionally misleading and salacious. They didn't overturn abortion or make it illegal. They allow states to decide.

Of course NPCs and other general brainless fools will never be able to comprehend that they can still kill babies in the liberal utopias of Cali and NYC.
 


Headlines like this, and they're all like this, are intentionally misleading and salacious. They didn't overturn abortion or make it illegal. They allow states to decide.

Of course NPCs and other general brainless fools will never be able to comprehend that they can still kill babies in the liberal utopias of Cali and NYC.
Let the peaceful protests begin!!
 
Let me know when you find a lot of those type people. Yes, I know Trump lost but still extremely wealthy, not close to bankrupt or poverty. Are you saying only elect people with the resources to stay out of the poor house? Oh yea, they're still (new) politicians.
I didn't say Trump. RE read what I said. You project, constantly, stuff that isn't in a post. I just said someone that hasn't been in politics and is willing to lose money. What is wrong with that criteria for a president? You could be worth $100,000 and as long as you're willing to risk that money to do what is right....

But keep seeing Trump in every post.
 
This is an argument that admits you just want to argue and do not care about real resolution. If that is your position, then you must admit a Dem president and Dem Congress must also be responsible for every state where crime is awful. The federal government is powerless to change problems in states that have cities where crime is horrendous? Of course not. But, when a city is defunding law enforcement, losing the trust of employees, failing to fully enforce laws, encouraging unrest, etc., the state and federal governments don’t have partners in those cities to effectuate positive change.
Last week a close friend of mine retired from the Louisville PD. This weerk he moved out of Kentucky. He told me he opened the gates of hell when he walked away into freedom from the LPD.

He was an exemplary cop.
 
OK, who decides, & how, that a person should have the gun taken away? I mean on what basis should the Uvalde shooter have had his weapons seized? Or shouldn't he have because he LEGALLY owned them? Is there no basis until after they've at least threatened someone? Oh, thanks for the 12.9% of the time.
Lol. you mean 18.3%? (100-81.7) but you are absolutely welcome, my 18.3% friend. :) IOW, i think you are right a little and wrong alot. Lets let "factchecker" come up with the right percentage bc he is all into real data (that was sarcasm).

The questions who and how are the real issue. Who do you recommends who gets to have guns and who doesnt? Should corporate media, Twitter or FB decide? (They basically did wrt information, btw.)
 
Holy sh-t they really did it...I'm really glad they did it, but someone is about to get hurt. The crazy libs about to go nuts, killing babies is their religion...the abortion preacher who use to post here is super pissed right now. F-ck him. F-ck all baby killers.
Yeah its gonna get ugly. The left is about to get extremely violent...maybe enough to cause a civil war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: exemjr and JoeSwag
Nancy Pelosi just started her press conference by saying 'there is no point saying good morning cause it's not a good morning' or something like that...I normally never watch the news, I hate the noise, I prefer to read the news...but if there is ever a day to watch msnbc or cnn...today is the day.


She already brought up Trump and Mitch McConnell and she is not really coherent. She is struggling to talk...vodka is clearly involved.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT