ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
None of them actually know what they spout off about actually means because they just change the definition to what they think it means.

Fascism before 2020.

Fascism is a movement that promotes the idea of a forcibly monolithic (large, powerful, and intractably indivisible and uniform) regimented (very strictly organized or controlled) nation under the control of an autocratic (relating to absolute power) ruler.

Sure sounds a lot like the Democrat party with how they want absolute power and expect everyone to fall in line while they are very strict and controlling.

Fascism in 2020 and beyond.

Fascism is generally defined as a political movement that embraces far-right nationalism and the forceful suppression of any opposition, all overseen by an authoritarian government.

So they try and say it's about Republicans/conservatives by throwing in the far right nationalism part, yet the only ones trying to suppress opposition with an authoritarian government is the Democrats/progressives. They also say this:

Fascists strongly oppose Marxism, liberalism and democracy, and believe the state takes precedence over individual interests.

None of that makes sense to me because it is contradictory. I'd say the Republicans support democracy while the Democrats support liberalism and Marxism. The Democrats also don't care about our individual rights (vax mandates for instance) unless it is to directly contradict the Republicans (like abortion and the alphabet mafia's rights).

This is why the whole education system needs to be torn down, cleaned out, and rebuilt to get the woke agenda out of there and get back to teaching and not indoctrinating.
I’ve been saying for awhile now that most of this BS is nothing more than a war on words because the left can’t win an argument if words mean what they’ve always meant.

What’s scary is the fact that some people, including Webster’s at times, accept these changes. Inserting political leaning into the definition of fascism is clearly agenda driven.
 
5u0mez.jpg
 
I'm all for it. Put them and everyone that supports them together and send them in as the first wave in the next war. When they are wiped out or captured (better hope it isn't against communist China) then send in the real troops that are there to support and defend the US.
If you think people who need a safe space when a conservative speaker is on campus are going to do anything but this:

saving-private-ryan-matt-damon.gif


during a war, then I don’t know what to tell you. And yes, they’ll be doing that in their “war safe space” and not on the actual battlefield.
 
This is something to keep an eye on. IMO the National Guard is the closest thing left to an actual militia. I expect a heavy handed response from the FED. Also be interesting to see what the state senate does. If the Guard gets some support I would expect other states to join in.

Oklahoma Guard goes rogue, rejects COVID vaccine mandate after sudden change of command​


https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/...ccine-mandate-after-sudden-change-of-command/

The new commander of the Oklahoma National Guard has declared the organization will not enforce the Defense Department’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate on its troops, according to local media outlets.

Army Brig. Gen. Thomas Mancino was announced as the state’s new adjutant general Wednesday, though he has not yet been confirmed by the state Senate.

On Nov. 2, Stitt formally requested that DoD not enforce the mandate on the state’s Army and Air National Guard members. In the letter, which his office posted online, he said that 10% of the state’s troops had refused the vaccine and that the mandate was “irresponsible.”

The Defense Department is aware of the Mancino memo and Stitt’s letter and “will respond to the governor appropriately,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said in a statement.

He did not elaborate.
 
“If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized ... If all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance -- you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest.” Ian Watson
 
On a lighter note, ESPN still sux. Proof:


The caption:

UK's Rose Jr. blossoms with MVP effort in Gator Bowl​

Asim Rose Jr. says the Kentucky seniors just wanted to go out with a win after he rushes for a career-high 148 yards against Indiana.

Do you guys recall us playing Indiana last year in the Gator Bowl? ESPN has writers writing about ish they know nothing about.
 
Interesting note (again lighter for now): if Wandale gets another 114 yards in the next 3 games, he will be the 6th receiver to break the 1,000 mark.

Trivia:
This would give UK a 2,000+ yard passer, 1,000+ yard rusher and 1,000+ yard receiver for the first time since when? (no peeking either...)
 
Great guess, but no
Okay, I can't take the suspense ...

Answer: 2007. Woodson had 3,709 passing, Little had 1,013 rushing and Stevie got loose for 1,041.

That is the only time in UK history this has happened that I've found. So ppl can complain all they want (and plenty to complain about), but this is a special season by UK historical standards.
 
I am interested to see how the next 5 or so years of Stoops go. Yes, we should be in contention for 8 or 9 win seasons most years, but at some point the next step will need to be taken. I mean look at this years team...this team shouldve won 11 games and didnt. I appreciate Stoops and what an amazing job he has done here, but he would already be on the hot seat at a top school for the 3 losses in a row on what shouldve been maybe the best team they've ever had. But we have sucked for so long that if we win 9 this year we will still be happy and Stoops could probably get Kroger Field named after him for it. But the next step eventually needs to be taken...
 
Back to the serious stuff:

Kind of debunks the OSHA argument completely. From 30 Sep. Title: Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States.

(Edit ... my bad. Submitted on 17 Aug and accepted on 9 Sep. This isn't new and they know.)

Findings:
At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.
 
If our "leaders" were capable of a little humility and admitting that what they tried was wrong, we we would be 1000% better off. They continue to hurt businesses simply because they want to keep doubling down on bad decisions because it gives them more power.

These people are disgusting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyCatFan
What does it really matter at this point?

All these folks in the intelligence communities could hold a press conference on CNN admitting to lying about everything and making shit up to try and stop Trump while working with the DNC to do so and nothing will ever happen to them. We may as well accept that we have a two-tiered justice system where some folks can lie to the FBI and work with the DNC to set up a soft coupe while others are locked away in solitary confinement for walking into the Capitol while a police officer holds the door open for them.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT