ADVERTISEMENT

POLITICAL THREAD

How will they rule ??!

  • YES - Qualified

    Votes: 41 82.0%
  • NO - Disqualified

    Votes: 9 18.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
Giving longterm workers a path to legal status is common sense not amnesty. If they have status then they are paying taxes and assimilating. If you think a 10 year path to a green card is amnesty you are a special kind of douchebag. Unless you like paying $10 for a head of lettuce get the **** over it. Americans are to spoiled to pick vegetables from dawn to dusk for min wage, Hispanics aren't.
217399908_901768797043897_829810084937272210_n.jpg
 
Details please.
Leaked his private conversations with foreign leaders.
Gave the Democrats a perfectly legal conversation with the Ukrainian President, igniting a ridiculous impeachment.
Placed operatives in contact with his campaign in an attempt to entrap them, either didn’t give him a heads up that members of his campaign were in contact with Russians, or they never were to begin with, you decide.
 
Leaked his private conversations with foreign leaders.
Gave the Democrats a perfectly legal conversation with the Ukrainian President, igniting a ridiculous impeachment.
Placed operatives in contact with his campaign in an attempt to entrap them, either didn’t give him a heads up that members of his campaign were in contact with Russians, or they never were to begin with, you decide.
Knew you couldn’t provide details without pointing to the Russia investigation. Which this document from months before shows was firmly grounded. Your only other example is just Trump’s own words becoming public. They wouldn’t be damaging if he had done nothing wrong.
 
INSURRECTION! ATTEMPTED GOV'T OVERTHROW! Will she/they be incarcerated like they've done for 1/6?
They're in the Senate Building!!
Why does she think black women don’t have the right to vote? Pretty sure they can vote just like the rest of us. Nobody I’m aware of is trying to prevent them from voting. Just asking they follow the same rules as everyone else. That’s all.
 
Last edited:
Knew you couldn’t provide details without pointing to the Russia investigation. Which this document from months before shows was firmly grounded. Your only other example is just Trump’s own words becoming public. They wouldn’t be damaging if he had done nothing wrong.
Attaboy Dion. When in panic mode always go back to Russia. It’s like the 3AM bootie call you know is a sure thing after striking out at the clubs. That’s exactly what this article is for. Odd how it comes to light when multiple states are having their fraudulent elections exposed.
 
Leaked his private conversations with foreign leaders.
Gave the Democrats a perfectly legal conversation with the Ukrainian President, igniting a ridiculous impeachment.
Placed operatives in contact with his campaign in an attempt to entrap them, either didn’t give him a heads up that members of his campaign were in contact with Russians, or they never were to begin with, you decide.
Don't forget the IRS illegally releasing his tax records.

So, other than the CIA, IRS, FBI (all that we KNOW of and has been proven), there wasn't any beauracracy that attacked or tried to undermine DJT.
 
Sorry the narrative you’ve lived by for the last four years got shattered. Must be tough on you.
So you buy this story which no one seems to have stood behind publicly? Yet refute all election fraud info which plenty of people are standing behind publicly. Wouldn’t you think the intelligence agents who investigated this would be happy to speak publicly about this report?
 
I found this on another forum. 😮

Great, but will one damn person be held accountable? Until that happens the report is just that. A nice read.
 
So you buy this story which no one seems to have stood behind publicly? Yet refute all election fraud info which plenty of people are standing behind publicly. Wouldn’t you think the intelligence agents who investigated this would be happy to speak publicly about this report?
They don’t reveal methods and sources. And the last one who stood up publicly got persecuted mercilessly(Vindman). Call this agent in front of Congress to testify and I’d bet he’d do his duty to our country and do just that. Even if it means being vilified by you ‘thin blue line’ LARPers.
 
They don’t reveal methods and sources. And the last one who stood up publicly got persecuted mercilessly(Vindman). Call this agent in front of Congress to testify and I’d bet he’d do his duty to our country and do just that. Even if it means being vilified by you ‘thin blue line’ LARPers.
[roll]
We already know the supposed source Dion.
 
Last edited:
“…the new ordinance will make it illegal to discriminate against a person due to their hairstyle and natural hair.”

About time. we’ve had such a horrible time with hair nazis. finally some sensible legislation. 🙄 i can’t wait to see what constitutes “hair discrimination” and what the penalties will be.
If your hair makes you look like a clown you should get what you deserve. If you don't like it there is someone that can take care of it for you.
kvJ27N1.gif
 
They don’t reveal methods and sources. And the last one who stood up publicly got persecuted mercilessly(Vindman). Call this agent in front of Congress to testify and I’d bet he’d do his duty to our country and do just that. Even if it means being vilified by you ‘thin blue line’ LARPers.
Vindman? You serious Clark? Vindman.

The guy, idiot< who testified that he heard from a guy who heard from a guy that admitted he wasn't even in the room at the time of the alleged call. So, Vindman, who claimed 3rd hand information which was admitted to be hearsay? That Vindamn?

You still have no idea why everyone on this board doesn't take you serious?
 
Vindman? You serious Clark? Vindman.

The guy, idiot< who testified that he heard from a guy who heard from a guy that admitted he wasn't even in the room at the time of the alleged call. So, Vindman, who claimed 3rd hand information which was admitted to be hearsay? That Vindamn?

You still have no idea why everyone on this board doesn't take you serious?
You mean the testimony that matched exactly the “perfect” transcript that was released? “Oh what he’s saying is 100% accurate sure, but he wasn’t there so it’s inadmissible hearsay donchaknow!”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gassy_Knowls
Medical data is never real time, it always has a lag time. Some of it in days and some of it in weeks. It varies widely by state and type of facility. HIPPA and non standard systems makes things slow. In the end it doesn't matter because it averages out across the month/year. Also why you should generally use a rolling week average when trying use this kind of medical data. The rolling deaths per day was finally starting to drop below 500 but is now quickly rising back to over 1000. Our response and control of COVID is pathetic, playing with the data won't make it look any better.
Screen-Shot-2021-07-15-at-10.51.29-AM-600x510.png
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT