ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Most likely to miss the NCAA tourney: UNC-Cheats or IUse2Be

Who do you have:

  • UNC-Cheats

    Votes: 5 8.2%
  • Indiana

    Votes: 13 21.3%
  • Both

    Votes: 43 70.5%

  • Total voters
    61

MdWIldcat55

All-American
Dec 9, 2007
20,761
78,158
113
Cheats: 13-9 (6-4 ACC) Next Three: Duke, Pitt, Clemson (1-7 Quad 1. Best win, UCLA.)

Hoosiers: 14-7 (5-5 B-10) Next Four: Purdue, WIsconsin, Michigan, Michigan State (2-7 Quad 1. Best win, Ohio State in OT.)

Honestly, both are in real jeopardy. But the ACC is so soft, the Cheaters have a chance to get to some magic number of wins, without having anything really on their resume besides a win over UCLA that is fading fast in significance. But...Hubert Davis.

Indiana has more chances to improve in Quad-1 performances. But...Mike Woodson.

I'll say the Hoosiers completely collapse and miss the tourney while the CHeats are a "last four in" type.
 
Last edited:
UNC has to win the ACC tournament, winning out the regular season doesnt improve their metrics enough to get into the tournament and they arent beating Clemson, UL or Duke in the ACC tournament so for sure they are out, the only question is will IU also be out. IU has the ability to win enough to get in but we'll see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Montana81
1-7 Quad 1.

HOOOOOO-BOOOOOOYYYY.

That's CHARMIN Soft.

Hubert better locate his glasses bc he's about to clear out his powder blue office.
 
2 million dollars spent on NILand Ballo blowing at casinos. Only to miss the tourney Even if IU is not what they used to be that won’t fly there. Woodson might be done.
Going to be interesting. The heat is definitely turning up on Woodson despite what he and his buddy Buckner think. IU isn’t likely to be lucky enough for Woodson to step down. Maybe Johnny Cougar will step up for the buyout.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: deep3
Cheats: 13-9 (6-4 ACC) Next Three: Duke, Pitt, Clemson (1-7 Quad 1. Best win, UCLA.)

Hoosiers: 14-7 (5-5 B-10) Next Four: Purdue, WIsconsin, Michigan, Michigan State (2-7 Quad 1. Best win, Ohio State in OT.)

Honestly, both are in real jeopardy. But the ACC is so soft, the Cheaters have a chance to get to some magic number of wins, without having anything really on their resume besides a win over UCLA that is fading fast in significance. But...Hubert Davis.

Indiana has more chances to improve in Quad-1 performances. But...Mike Woodson.

I'll say the Hoosiers completely collapse and miss the tourney while the CHeats are a "last four in" type.
IU has the best shot to pick up quality wins but will they? IU basketball is a hot mess right now and it may get ugly.

UNC wins the games they should which are much easier than IU’s games and their name gives them a better shot in my opinion.
 
Going to be interesting. The heat is definitely turning up on Woodson despite what he and his buddy Buckner think. IU isn’t likely to be lucky enough for Woodson to step down. Maybe Johnny Cougar will step up for the buyout.
As much as I laugh at IU and don't care for them, they deserve a bit better than what they are getting.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CatEye2010
Right now they are both out.

UNC is 42 in the Net and 39 in KenPom. That’s close to a bubble team.

IU is 68 in the Net and 62 in KenPom. They aren’t even close to being an NCAAT team right now.
And being a bubble team in a very weak ACC (who is like 5-42 against T25 competition) means you shouldn't get in.
 
I know I’ll get blasted but I don’t mind- I liked it when IU was good. Those games, and I went to a few in person, were so intense that I remember the hatred- actual hate. Right now I only feel it for Duke or KU.
 
Right now they are both out.

UNC is 42 in the Net and 39 in KenPom. That’s close to a bubble team.

IU is 68 in the Net and 62 in KenPom. They aren’t even close to being an NCAAT team right now.
Plus IU is looking at 7 more losses if they don’t figure it out. I dont think they will figure it out because of Woodson. If IU could figure it out they could move up but I just dont see it.
 
I think UNC is about finished. IU has tons of chances left to get Q1 wins.

But i’d bet on both missing. The Big12, B1G and SEC are going to eat up most of the at large bids this year.


I just looked through the NET and I counted about 34 teams just from the SEC, B1G, Big12 and Big East alone that i’d say have better metrics than UNC and IU. 4 of those teams will get the auto bid. But then add UL, Clemson, Duke and arguably Pitt now from the ACC. 1 more auto bid. You’re still at 33 not even counting mid majors. A few of which will still likely take an at large spot.

Yeah…UNC and IU maybe cooked. But we’ll see. Still a lot of games to play.
 
Cheats: 13-9 (6-4 ACC) Next Three: Duke, Pitt, Clemson (1-7 Quad 1. Best win, UCLA.)

Hoosiers: 14-7 (5-5 B-10) Next Four: Purdue, WIsconsin, Michigan, Michigan State (2-7 Quad 1. Best win, Ohio State in OT.)

Honestly, both are in real jeopardy. But the ACC is so soft, the Cheaters have a chance to get to some magic number of wins, without having anything really on their resume besides a win over UCLA that is fading fast in significance. But...Hubert Davis.

Indiana has more chances to improve in Quad-1 performances. But...Mike Woodson.

I'll say the Hoosiers completely collapse and miss the tourney while the CHeats are a "last four in" type.
UNC prolly squeaks in, but in reality I think both should miss it. We all know if there is any sliver like they beat Duke, they could lose out and still be considered.
 
I think UNC is about finished. IU has tons of chances left to get Q1 wins.

But i’d bet on both missing. The Big12, B1G and SEC are going to eat up most of the at large bids this year.


I just looked through the NET and I counted about 34 teams just from the SEC, B1G, Big12 and Big East alone that i’d say have better metrics than UNC and IU. 4 of those teams will get the auto bid. But then add UL, Clemson, Duke and arguably Pitt now from the ACC. 1 more auto bid. You’re still at 33 not even counting mid majors. A few of which will still likely take an at large spot.

Yeah…UNC and IU maybe cooked. But we’ll see. Still a lot of games to play.
They would both have to rely on every mid major favorite getting their auto bid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Montana81
They would both have to rely on every mid major favorite getting their auto bid.

There are 12 SEC teams right now that are both higher in the NET AND have more Quad 1 wins than UNC’s 1. And then a 13th, Oklahoma, that is only 4 spots behind them in the NET but have 3 more Quad 1 wins.

If the field were picked today there are 13 SEC teams that would be safely in imo. Only Arkansas, LSU and South Carolina would be out.



The ACC is so so bad. They are not getting 5 teams in unless the tourney winner comes from outside that top 4. They may not get 4 in. If it’s selection sunday and you only have 1 or 2 Q1 wins this year, you’re probably screwed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
There are 12 SEC teams right now that are both higher in the NET AND have more Quad 1 wins than UNC’s 1. And then a 13th, Oklahoma, that is only 4 spots behind them in the NET but have 3 more Quad 1 wins.

If the field were picked today there are 13 SEC teams that would be safely in imo. Only Arkansas, LSU and South Carolina would be out.

Just saw Pitt is ahead of UNC in NET as well and has the same amount of Q1 and Q2 wins (1/4). So that’s another team ahead of them.

The ACC is so so bad. They are not getting 5 teams in unless the tourney winner comes from outside that top 4. They may not get 4 in. If it’s selection sunday and you only have 1 or 2 Q1 wins this year, you’re probably screwed.
Man that shows how bad Calipari has been this year. 13 teams in the SEC can get an at large and he manages to not be one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotelblue
it goes against selection committee history, but unc is probably not making the tournament.

even if they should happen to beat duke once. they’re going to have 13-14 losses, and they’re resume is bad. a .500 big ten/sec team should get in way before them. the above poster is right, they basically have to win the acct.

they had a chance early in the year to build some confidence, but they lost every marquee game. you have to win your share of those, and at least 1-2 of them. they have no impressive wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fox2monk
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT