Jim Nance,, think that's his name,, called UNC out during the game the other night over it all..
He actually called it "Innuendo". He's as ill informed as the UNC fan posting ITT.Jim Nance,, think that's his name,, called UNC out during the game the other night over it all..
Yes there is. There is eye witness evidence. Now, you can claim he is lying for some bizarre and unknown reason, but you have no proof of that, it would just be your opinion. Please note he took 18 classes in AFAM.Well, right here is one: "Some of those grades allowed athletes to stay eligible." There is no proof of this. This is an opinion. And it usually comes from someone who wants to believe this is what happened.
One could claim that a class that only gives one exam at UK keeps UK one-and-doners eligible. Etc. Just saying it doesn't make it true though.
like?lol, there are statements in that article that are just untrue.
I didn't hear it,, just know UNC fans are going after his throat over it..He actually called it "Innuendo". He's as ill informed as the UNC fan posting ITT.
The last thing we need is a trash troll trying to clean up the trash!!!!!!!lol, there are statements in that article that are just untrue. Clearly an opinion piece.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
Because he didn't do anything wrong. The NCAA has not once stated that Roy Williams did anything wrong. In fact, the NCAA cleared Roy Williams of any wrongdoing.
Again, knowing the facts is always helpful when you want to talk about something.
This is exactly the kind of red herring argument I'm talking about. One of a dozen absolute stinkers that UNC fans have been clinging to and which would make every philosophy and logic professor on campus want to evacuate his lunch.No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
Because he didn't do anything wrong. The NCAA has not once stated that Roy Williams did anything wrong. In fact, the NCAA cleared Roy Williams of any wrongdoing.
Again, knowing the facts is always helpful when you want to talk about something.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
Because he didn't do anything wrong. The NCAA has not once stated that Roy Williams did anything wrong. In fact, the NCAA cleared Roy Williams of any wrongdoing.
Again, knowing the facts is always helpful when you want to talk about something.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. .
He actually called it "Innuendo". He's as ill informed as the UNC fan posting ITT.
So you can extend this same logic. Fraudulently walk around in military fatigues, in pilot's gear, or trying to do open heart surgery, and when somebody wants to penalize you for not having the proper credentials, just state that they have no idea what would've happened if you'd decided to go to med school or boot camp or whatever.
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible?
No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
Just save us the freaking time, your full of it and you know it ! Those cheating bastards have done this for twenty years and its time to pay up !!No it doesn't. If those classes were not there, McCants would have taken other classes. How do you know he would have failed those classes and thus been ineligible? In order to believe that, one has to make an assumption. You can't argue backwards. Not to mention that most of what McCants says is suspect because (1) he refuses to make his claims under oath with the threat of perjury hanging over his head, (2) most of his claims are completely rejected as untrue by every one of his teammates.
And btw, keep in mind, not all of the AFAM department classes were suspect.
lol, there are statements in that article that are just untrue. Clearly an opinion piece.
Ole Roy is dirty and UNC should be punished for letting the Players use free cars under his watch alone. Keep sticking your head in the sand every coach at UNC starting with Dean Smith was dirty.
Actually, Roy was included in the "Individuals Who May Be Mentioned in The Factual Information Chart" in the most recent ANOA. You may want to pump the brakes.
Plus, Roy was responsible for Wayne Walden who is neck deep. Strict Liability is a beyotch.
GL is either a troll or an AFAM grad...
I think you mean 1957. UNC beat Chamberlain and Kansas in triple overtime after Wilt fouled out. Many believe McGuire---Dean's mentor---was cheating then. McGuire went on to get in trouble in South Carolina I believe. Regardless, the only title without a blemish is 1982. Wainstain arbitrarily stopped his investigation at 1993 even though the AFAM department was started way before then and players began to get pushed toward this major before 1993. I believe its JP Scott who mentioned that 1982 may well be tainted, bc UNC was doing the same things with Communications majors (I think this was Jordan's and Worthy's major) that it later did with AFAM. Regardless, 2005 and 2009...and potentially 2017 are fraught with fraud. I say 2017, bc I will go to my grave insisting the officiating was some of the worst I have ever seen. Ever. That game was stolen from UK.