More proof we are going to be ok without Cal

[UKSanders]

This is so untrue. Just go back over the last 10 years and look at the kids who everyone thought would be great. Many are, but many also struggled and failed to live up to expectations. This is what other fans would say to make themselves feel better about losing recruiting battles. We have a couple too. Coaching isn’t the only thing that contributes to the success or failure of a player in the league.

Our fans hate for Cal blinds them from acknowledging something that he actually is amazing at, which is preparing these kids for the NBA. What other school has anywhere near the number of max contracts currently? What about the number of players who sign huge contracts compared to how many get drafted overall?

Say what you want about Cals coaching, but to deny his ability to recruit, get kids to the league, and have them go on to see huge success is just making yourself look silly.

I think the problem is no one denied his ability to recruit elite individual players (I think there is some reasonable argument the last few years that he didn't recruit players that complemented each other well enough to form a balanced unit).

However, I have some issue with the wording of the following:

• What other school has anywhere near the number of max contracts currently?
  • Are you asking total number or %? That matters b/c everyone can acknowledge that Cal & Coach K were signing more elite recruits than anyone else, so the 2 of them should have the most players with max contracts. But, what about percent of "top" recuits that those guys signed who ended up with max contracts compared to other coaches? That would be a better indicator of their ability to consistently "develop" them for max contracts. My guess is the sample size won't be high enough for other coaches to make this a valuable statistic
• Say what you want about Cals coaching, but to deny his ability to recruit, get kids to the league and have them go on to see huge success is just making yourself look silly
  • I would argue the underlined portion isn't specific to Cal... as stated above, so many of his 1 and done would've been in the league regardless of where they played. In fact, most of them would not have played for Cal had the 1 and done rule been in place.
  • "go on to have huge success" - I don't think anyone is arguing that Cal hasn't had former players go on to have HUGE success in the league. I think the argument most are making is how much of that is likely attributable to Cal. I won't say he hasn't helped players at all. but I am also not saying these contracts are directly related to skills he helped them develop that no one else was going to do.

 

[NociHTTP]

Whenever I accepted that Cal’s main priority is getting guys drafted, hearing stuff like this made a lot more sense. I remember trying to rationalize this stuff as for recruiting, etc. I really think Cal feels his main job is player development and preparing them for the next level. Fox pretty much said how Cal views the actual games/results.

I've been saying this all along. Cal was never about UK, he was about being the best paid NBA mentor / agent / recruiter. If Fox said that, why weren't there players on Cal's teams saying "hold up, I thought we were here for UK!".

 

[ukcatz12]

That wasn't his job. Why do we move the goal post when discussing Cal??

Did I say it was his job?

 

[NociHTTP]

I think there's an argument to be made while most of Cal's guys would have gotten to the NBA without him, he set them up for success while in the NBA. Look at the difference between Cal's guys and K's guys when it comes to getting that second contract and having longevity in the league. I do think there's a reason the NBA is full of established former UK guys.

His job was never to set them up for success in the NBA. His job was to set them up for success at UK.

 

[ukcatz12]

His job was never to set them up for success in the NBA. His job was to set them up for success at UK.

I never said his job was to set them up for NBA success.

 

[SemperFiCat]

This entire "Cal got these guys paid" debate sounds eerily like the Hoosiers' "Bobby Knight made good young men". These are both strawman arguments. Propping up coaches who weren't fulfilling their primary job as coach. Sure, those secondary things are fantastic, IF they are prioritized correctly and the winning is happening. But what many fail to realize is that Cal prioritized the NBA part because it was the easiest part of the job. He was taking credit for getting NBA talent paid. That's way easier than roster management, film study, winning big games, answering tough questions and cutting down nets. So, he distracted us with the easier thing to stroke his ego. Convincing many of us that it's a main part of the job that he's excelling at, and tried to make himself the saint with the "ending generational poverty" spin. Cal prioritized the easiest thing to make himself look good. He was too scared to really tackle the hard stuff.

 

[Bluesbrother]

He is hellbent on doing it his way. He’d rather go down playing his style than admit other ways are effective. Once arky fans start to question him, they’ll hear the same tired phrases we got in Lexington.

... and that "questioning" won't take long. It's not like they will have to figure it our themselves.

 

[UKFBFan78]

I think there's an argument to be made while most of Cal's guys would have gotten to the NBA without him, he set them up for success while in the NBA. Look at the difference between Cal's guys and K's guys when it comes to getting that second contract and having longevity in the league. I do think there's a reason the NBA is full of established former UK guys.

Yes. Cal has more of the top recruits. There's your reason. Take cals first 10 recruiting classes, that's where all the players with max contracts originated. Then compare those to any other school during that time frame. Duke is only one that even comes close to the same talent level

 

[DreadLox]

Too many other coaches drew from the same pool of ranked players and haven't had Calipari's success in getting players to succeed in the league.

Calipari taught them something. What he didn't do was care about tournaments or individual games.

 

[NociHTTP]

I never said his job was to set them up for NBA success.

"he set them up for success while in the NBA"

 

[CB3UK]

"More proof we are going to be OK without Cal"

WTF kind of thread title is this? What fan is still worried about life after Cal?

 

[m080470]

It was these kind of inane, stupid comments from him that would send me into a cold sweat the last few years. Got a little jeebed out for two seconds and then realized this is an Arkansas problem now and happily went on with my day.

 

[chroix]

SOB can field an entire all star team by himself but can’t get past St Peters.

 

[UK90]

It seems like everything Cal talks about has something to do with the NBA.

Makes me wonder why he doesn’t coach in that league anymore.

Easy answer. They don’t want him.

 

[UKWildcats1987]

Of course we are going to be ok. We are Kentucky.

And if a coach isn't a dumb drunk he is gonna win at least 1 title and make 1 to 4 final fours. I'm basing this on post the GOAT Rupp. He's n a league of his own at UK.

Pope isn't a dumb drunk so I expect a title and 2 to 4 final fours the next decade if he is here that long.

 

[Blueaz]

Well... SGA, Book, and Murray all dominate the mid range.

Book developed his in the NBA not at UK. I am not sure about the others

 

[kywildcatsfannumber1]

So glad the era of Kentucky Basketball being used as an NBA farm system as a pit stop before these guys jet off to the league is over. All of that talent with one National Championship to show for.

 

[Mike-McD]

When you look at the staggering number of great NBA players from Cal’s time at Kentucky, the legacy question will alway be, “why didn’t he win more?”

Even Dale Brown, who went 0-for-Shaq in three years, be like "damn."

 

[Wonky]

I've been saying this all along. Cal was never about UK

Wrong. He was about UK up until the Wisconsin game, and his results reflect that. But that loss was seen as such a monumental failure by the fanbase (and really the entire country) that it made Cal very bitter because he desperately wanted that season to be viewed as a success. And the only way he could do that was point to all the draft picks. THAT is when his priorities truly shifted. It was never about being the highest paid… it was about trying to shift the narrative of what his job actually was because he realized that was a lot easier than having to coach and be held accountable for his piss poor coaching decisions.

 

[Wonky]

Book developed his in the NBA not at UK. I am not sure about the others

Booker couldn’t hit a bull in the ass with a bass fiddle when it mattered. That’s all I care about. I don’t care if he scores 40 a night for PHX… they ain’t my team.

 

[yoshukai]

It seems like everything Cal talks about has something to do with the NBA.

Makes me wonder why he doesn’t coach in that league anymore.

Because no team wants him , lol.

 

[Skyguyb27]

Of course we are going to be ok. We are Kentucky.

And if a coach isn't a dumb drunk he is gonna win at least 1 title and make 1 to 4 final fours. I'm basing this on post the GOAT Rupp. He's n a league of his own at UK.

Pope isn't a dumb drunk so I expect a title and 2 to 4 final fours the next decade if he is here that long.

Where else would he go?

 

[Skyguyb27]

Wrong. He was about UK up until the Wisconsin game, and his results reflect that. But that loss was seen as such a monumental failure by the fanbase (and really the entire country) that it made Cal very bitter because he desperately wanted that season to be viewed as a success. And the only way he could do that was point to all the draft picks. THAT is when his priorities truly shifted. It was never about being the highest paid… it was about trying to shift the narrative of what his job actually was because he realized that was a lot easier than having to coach and be held accountable for his piss poor coaching decisions.

Mmm I have to partially disagree even his first few years he was saying the NBA crap, great night for UK is draft night type trash. People just overlooked as recruit talk because he was winning and ball was exciting again.

 

[bbncal02]

"More proof we are going to be OK without Cal"

WTF kind of thread title is this? What fan is still worried about life after Cal?

Not worried. It’s just more of “Holly hell. It was def. time for him to go.” More of it wasn’t just us going this guy is crazy. He’s still saying the same crap. Hopefully Ark fans are starting to go “Uh oh”.

How it must feel to be an Arky fan right now:

 

[bbncal02]

Mmm I have to partially disagree even his first few years he was saying the NBA crap, great night for UK is draft night type trash. People just overlooked as recruit talk because he was winning and ball was exciting again.

He was always a good ambassador for the program in terms of the showing up for things. Did good for the flood and tornado victims. Helped some players learn to be good people.
The rest? Meh