This is so untrue. Just go back over the last 10 years and look at the kids who everyone thought would be great. Many are, but many also struggled and failed to live up to expectations. This is what other fans would say to make themselves feel better about losing recruiting battles. We have a couple too. Coaching isn’t the only thing that contributes to the success or failure of a player in the league.
Our fans hate for Cal blinds them from acknowledging something that he actually is amazing at, which is preparing these kids for the NBA. What other school has anywhere near the number of max contracts currently? What about the number of players who sign huge contracts compared to how many get drafted overall?
Say what you want about Cals coaching, but to deny his ability to recruit, get kids to the league, and have them go on to see huge success is just making yourself look silly.
I think the problem is no one denied his ability to recruit elite individual players (I think there is some reasonable argument the last few years that he didn't recruit players that complemented each other well enough to form a balanced unit).
However, I have some issue with the wording of the following:
- What other school has anywhere near the number of max contracts currently?
- Are you asking total number or %? That matters b/c everyone can acknowledge that Cal & Coach K were signing more elite recruits than anyone else, so the 2 of them should have the most players with max contracts. But, what about percent of "top" recuits that those guys signed who ended up with max contracts compared to other coaches? That would be a better indicator of their ability to consistently "develop" them for max contracts. My guess is the sample size won't be high enough for other coaches to make this a valuable statistic
- Say what you want about Cals coaching, but to deny his ability to recruit, get kids to the league and have them go on to see huge success is just making yourself look silly
- I would argue the underlined portion isn't specific to Cal... as stated above, so many of his 1 and done would've been in the league regardless of where they played. In fact, most of them would not have played for Cal had the 1 and done rule been in place.
- "go on to have huge success" - I don't think anyone is arguing that Cal hasn't had former players go on to have HUGE success in the league. I think the argument most are making is how much of that is likely attributable to Cal. I won't say he hasn't helped players at all. but I am also not saying these contracts are directly related to skills he helped them develop that no one else was going to do.