![www.wsbtv.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcmg-cmg-tv-10010-prod.cdn.arcpublishing.com%2Fresizer%2FlSK9yoZhvf4DLoUeE_C_zBKYUFE%3D%2F1440x810%2Ffilters%3Aformat%28jpg%29%3Aquality%2870%29%2Fd1hfln2sfez66z.cloudfront.net%2F05-04-2023%2Ft_c160b3101c6d447bb072ea6ef86eb1b5_name_Scene_where_Deion_Patterson_was_taken_into_custody.jpeg&hash=18f851f97a1cdaa96e4aa5cff3231619&return_error=1)
ATLANTA ACTIVE SHOOTER: Suspected gunman arrested after killing 1, injuring 4 others in Midtown
Patterson was taken into custody just before 8 p.m. in Cobb County, according to the City of Atlanta.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just fyi that’s every weekend in major cities. The “mass shooter” thing came out in the last 20 years. They count gang violence as mass shootings too which was never a thing beforehand.![]()
ATLANTA ACTIVE SHOOTER: Suspected gunman arrested after killing 1, injuring 4 others in Midtown
Patterson was taken into custody just before 8 p.m. in Cobb County, according to the City of Atlanta.www.wsbtv.com
Just fyi that’s every weekend in major cities. The “mass shooter” thing came out in the last 20 years. They count gang violence as mass shootings too which was never a thing beforehand.
It’s awful either way. Most people didn’t give a shit about them in Chicago or any other major city that didn’t affect them until recently.
The topic of this thread concerned a mass shooting at a bank in Louisville that occurred a few days after a mass shooting at a school in Nashville. I'd venture to say that both of those hit home for the demographics on this board. You can picture yourself or your family members involved in that type of shooting, unlike a gang shooting in Chicago. For some reasons, "Chicago" is always brought up when talking about these mass shootings in suburbia. Now people are bringing up "immigrants" as if that has anything to do with the topic. So the idiotic conversations go round and round.
An illegal immigrant that has been arrested multiple times for crossing the border just killed 5 people.The topic of this thread concerned a mass shooting at a bank in Louisville that occurred a few days after a mass shooting at a school in Nashville. I'd venture to say that both of those hit home for the demographics on this board. You can picture yourself or your family members involved in that type of shooting, unlike a gang shooting in Chicago. For some reasons, "Chicago" is always brought up when talking about these mass shootings in suburbia. Now people are bringing up "immigrants" as if that has anything to do with the topic. So the idiotic conversations go round and round.
Now people are bringing up "immigrants" as if that has anything to do with the topic. So the idiotic conversations go round and round.
Doesn’t help his argument so of course he skips over it.You miss the recent event in Texas or just another blind eye to the problem?
Illegal immigrants or documented immigrants here lawfully?Everyone wants things better but they aren’t going to sacrifice money or safety for it.
Show me one person in this thread that will take in immigrants or want them in their neighborhood.
The subject shootings led immediately, as usual, to discussions about gun restrictions. That discussion involves more than the Louisville shootings, including the fact that illegal immigrants can get guns. It’s not idiotic if you try. But, calling others’ comments idiotic seems to serve some people who cannot come to grips that others might disagree with them. As a lawyer, it might be good to avoid the ad hominem arguments.The topic of this thread concerned a mass shooting at a bank in Louisville that occurred a few days after a mass shooting at a school in Nashville. I'd venture to say that both of those hit home for the demographics on this board. You can picture yourself or your family members involved in that type of shooting, unlike a gang shooting in Chicago. For some reasons, "Chicago" is always brought up when talking about these mass shootings in suburbia. Now people are bringing up "immigrants" as if that has anything to do with the topic. So the idiotic conversations go round and round.
The bolded part is where we have a problem. Since mass shootings are a weekly occurrence, that would mean the laws "on the books" aren't being enforced a lot of the time. So as a society what do we do about that?Chicago is brought up because people always cite statistics without acknowledging gang violence, along with other things, make those statistics meaningless for purposes of the argument people are generally trying to make.
Illegal immigration was brought up this time, because people immediately jump to gun control and additional gun laws, but if we just enforced the laws that were already on the books the Texas shooting would have never happened. It absolutely has something to do with the topic.
The bolded part is where we have a problem. Since mass shootings are a weekly occurrence, that would mean the laws "on the books" aren't being enforced a lot of the time. So as a society what do we do about that?
I love immigrants. I don’t want any other adult other than my wife living with me though.Everyone wants things better but they aren’t going to sacrifice money or safety for it.
Show me one person in this thread that will take in immigrants or want them in their neighborhood.
The topic of this thread concerned a mass shooting at a bank in Louisville that occurred a few days after a mass shooting at a school in Nashville. I'd venture to say that both of those hit home for the demographics on this board. You can picture yourself or your family members involved in that type of shooting, unlike a gang shooting in Chicago. For some reasons, "Chicago" is always brought up when talking about these mass shootings in suburbia. Now people are bringing up "immigrants" as if that has anything to do with the topic. So the idiotic conversations go round and round.
Hold our elected leaders and law enforcement responsible.
This isn't exactly the gotcha people on the right think it is. If you stay out of gang activity you won't be killed in a gang shooting. Anyone can be a victim of a mass shooting at a grocery store, or a mall, or a movie theater, or a bank, or a school. One is 100% avoidable. The other, while chances are still incredibly low, isn't. And the threat of that seeps into every day life in a very tangible way. We go to a movie or a concert and pay extra attention to where the exits are, or worry about the person acting weird at the grocery store. I've never once been afraid of being shot in a gang shooting.Most people didn’t give a shit about them in Chicago
I often think the only way anything changes is until every community in the country has been victim to this. But realistically even then nothing will change.these localized tragedies are just devastating to communities around the country. That in itself can mess with you mentally if this is your community.
Most people killed by gangs are in gangs. Not all.This isn't exactly the gotcha people on the right think it is. If you stay out of gang activity you won't be killed in a gang shooting. Anyone can be a victim of a mass shooting at a grocery store, or a mall, or a movie theater, or a bank, or a school. One is 100% avoidable. The other, while chances are still incredibly low, isn't. And the threat of that seeps into every day life in a very tangible way. We go to a movie or a concert and pay extra attention to where the exits are, or worry about the person acting weird at the grocery store. I've never once been afraid of being shot in a gang shooting.
I've said this before in another mass shooting thread (or maybe it's this one, who knows at this point), but does it really matter? If we remove gang shootings from the statistic does that make the murder of school children more acceptable because there are technically only 50 mass shootings per year and not 400? I think the answer is pretty clearly no. It doesn't matter if people have different definitions of what a mass shooting is, we clearly have a gigantic issue that no other first world country has.Because as Rogue said, gang shootings are for some reason included in "mass shootings". When you remove gang related/inner-city shootings (which generally don't involve innocent bystanders, but can), you start to see the numbers plummet.
So again, you tell me what you would do? I really want to know the right moves that would stop it. I’d be all for it.I've said this before in another mass shooting thread (or maybe it's this one, who knows at this point), but does it really matter? If we remove gang shootings from the statistic does that make the murder of school children more acceptable because there are technically only 50 mass shootings per year and not 400? I think the answer is pretty clearly no. It doesn't matter if people have different definitions of what a mass shooting is, we clearly have a gigantic issue that no other first world country has.
I'm not a policy genius, but I posted some ideas earlier in this thread. Or maybe it was the previous mass shooting thread. Sad that there's so many I can't remember.So again, you tell me what you would do? I really want to know the right moves that would stop it. I’d be all for it.
I have ideas too.
This is spot on. 9 of the top 15 deadliest shootings in Texas history have now come under Abbott.why isn't anyone here crushing Greg Abbott for slashing mental health care funding in TX while pleading on Twitter for Texans to buy more guns so his state can be number one in gun sales?
Then please tell me? All honesty.I'm not a policy genius, but I posted some ideas earlier in this thread. Or maybe it was the previous mass shooting thread. Sad that there's so many I can't remember.
Presumably Cruz didn't know the shooter was dead when he made that tweet."To do justice"
You missed my point.So you’re skeptical of red flag laws because of the potential for government overreach but you’re in favor of permitting the government to involuntarily hospitalize people? That makes no sense. Let’s put him in the mental hospital but don’t you dare take away his right to own a gun!
Hard to read past your snark about Chicago (as in I did not). You take a superior tone with a strawman argument of your own creation in a thread that you pretend is of utmost importance. Seems this is becoming more about you than a discussion.Just to update, nine dead including the gunman IN TEXAS. Capitalized that incase anyone wants to blame Chicago again because the color blue and libs. I broke a toe last year and didn't curse Chicago as the cause but maybe I should have. For as much shit gets slung at the Windy City, why isn't anyone here crushing Greg Abbott for slashing mental health care funding in TX while pleading on Twitter for Texans to buy more guns so his state can be number one in gun sales? Like I said in the past, it might not be the best idea to tell literally everyone in your state that they need guns. Half the country doesn't have common sense and people on both sides are dumbasses, many with anger and emotional issues. Stop begging your audience on social media to buy buy buy guns when you have no idea who your audience even is.
Anyway, I'm seeing the same bs online. Politicians not wanting to find solutions, instead telling us to pray more. When you shift blame to those who don't pray, you're not a serious person. And that's not an "attack" on faith. Pray as much as you want, but again, that's not changing what's happening.
"To do justice"
I don't even know what that means. The gunman was killed, as are many others. It's done; over. What justice is there now? Also, this isn't a horror movie. Calling the gunman a "monster" and talking about evil as if this person is Michael Myers won't solve anything. We can't pretend these killers are horror movie villains that will do "evil" by any means necessary. That's a defeatist attitude.
Hopefully next week I won't need to post about another mass shooting here, but I'm skeptical.
Presumably Cruz didn't know the shooter was dead when he made that tweet.
I would like to see some states experiment with criminal liability for the family of shooters in situations where it is clear the individual was disturbed and the family never got the shooter help or otherwise intervened.
Abbott did all he could by offering thoughts and prayers. What else can he do?
The guy has actively fought every gun control idea floated. His “thoughts and prayers” should make a tv preacher cringe.Abbott did all he could by offering thoughts and prayers. What else can he do?
There's been a lot of talk about red flag laws in this thread. I'm not intellectually opposed to such laws but I am inclined to think the implementation is likely to lead to massive government overreach without accomplishing much