Hold this thought (although the Post is probably overstated) and now go back and look at your posts condemning comments about right wing influences as to the Paul Pelosi attack. We all suspect you condemned those, as well.What point do you think you’re proving exactly? I find it ironic the guy talking media conspiracies is citing an article from a major newspaper on one of the biggest media platforms in the world all the while claiming a media cover up.
And what difference does this killer‘s ”manifesto” make to politics? It’d be like Ted Bundy blaming his killing spree on pornogeaphy. It’d be like Charlie Manson blaming his killing spree on rock and roll. The reasoning of a crazy person makes no difference.
Or are you suggesting that there’s causality between a 25 year old’s political views and their ability to murder innocent people? You can claim that. Of course you’d have to ignore that we’ve seen mass shooters in pretty much every demographic.
The difference between me and you here is that what I’m saying doesn’t change regardless of perceived political affiliation, where you see it as a propaganda win in your culture war.
Obviously, mental illness is a complex issue, but what are the influences that impact the mentally ill to commit such atrocities? Mention media and people cry foul. How about the angry tone of politics and the constant claims that political opponents “hate?” Does that contribute?