ADVERTISEMENT

Mark Zuckerberg / Facebook

What were some of these "insanely idiotic conspiracy theories"?
All the ones the Liberals floated.


a group of people are sitting at a table with glasses of beer
 
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr2
Blah blah blah. Using vague random points that have no beginning or end, using weird political names, personally insulting a fellow citizen, no accountability to the people in power in a thread where there is concrete evidence that the government quieted dissent. No disappointment in how things are handled? Argue the points directly if you’d like - I’m cool with that and will listen. There are no points in your post to discuss because you didn’t make any. If you feel like 90% is wrong - then tell me the percentage you feel were correct and backed by science and let’s start there. Try to make a point instead of vague arguments that don’t actually say anything.
I think your argument here is just further evidence that people like @DreadLox and others favor Government censorship of anyone who dares to stray from their narratives. Covid was just one of the primary examples Zuckerberg brought up. Do they also stand behind the Hunter Biden Laptop story being suppressed in that way? The Ashley Biden Diary? Anyone who brings forth evidence of voter fraud maybe? What else are they willing to suppress or censor? Do they think the Government has our best interest at heart and is the best institution to protect us from ourselves? Do they think we shouldn't be allowed to make up our own minds? Do they think the Government should be the arbiters of truth? Because that's what I see when anyone is on here defending the feds colluding with social media outlets to censor Americans and suppress true stories.
 
Yeah, I think my favorite was the one about injecting bleach into the human body as a means to kill covid. Whoever thought up that one is a real dumbass.


Always amazes me people can log in to Catpaw and post, so obviously have some baseline ability to use the internet, yet still fall for bullshit like thinking anyone ever told them to inject bleach. Really just don’t know how some of you people function on a daily basis.
 
I think your argument here is just further evidence that people like @DreadLox and others favor Government censorship of anyone who dares to stray from their narratives. Covid was just one of the primary examples Zuckerberg brought up. Do they also stand behind the Hunter Biden Laptop story being suppressed in that way? The Ashley Biden Diary? Anyone who brings forth evidence of voter fraud maybe? What else are they willing to suppress or censor? Do they think the Government has our best interest at heart and is the best institution to protect us from ourselves? Do they think we shouldn't be allowed to make up our own minds? Do they think the Government should be the arbiters of truth? Because that's what I see when anyone is on here defending the feds colluding with social media outlets to censor Americans and suppress true stories.
The antecedent of the Hunter Biden laptop was the Republican leak about the Weiner laptop that decided the 2016 election.

The provenance of the Hunter Biden laptop was rightfully considered dicey. Who in government has had the actual hard drive even now? Who can provide proof of the trail of possession?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix
The antecedent of the Hunter Biden laptop was the Republican leak about the Weiner laptop that decided the 2016 election.

The provenance of the Hunter Biden laptop was rightfully considered dicey. Who in government has had the actual hard drive even now? Who can provide proof of the trail of possession?
This is a LIE.

The FBI’s failure to alert social-media companies that the Hunter Biden laptop was real, and not mere Russian disinformation, is particularly troubling. The FBI had the laptop in their possession since December 2019 and had warned social-media companies to look for a “hack and dump” operation by the Russians prior to the 2020 election. Even after Facebook specifically asked whether the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation, Dehmlow of the FBI refused to comment, resulting in the social-media companies’ suppression of the story. As a result, millions of U.S. citizens did not hear the story prior to the November 3, 2020 election.

LINK
 
The antecedent of the Hunter Biden laptop was the Republican leak about the Weiner laptop that decided the 2016 election.

The provenance of the Hunter Biden laptop was rightfully considered dicey. Who in government has had the actual hard drive even now? Who can provide proof of the trail of possession?
The Weiner laptop info was true, just inconvenient for Hillary.

I guess you could say they learned their lesson, because the efforts to obfuscate the Hunter laptop were swift and coordinated.
 
The Weiner laptop info was true, just inconvenient for Hillary.

I guess you could say they learned their lesson, because the efforts to obfuscate the Hunter laptop were swift and coordinated.
There was an investigation, yes, into the Weiner laptop. There was nothing there. But the revelation tipped the election.

There was nothing incriminating about Joe Biden on the Hunter Biden laptop. Lots of well-coordinated efforts. Do you know by whom?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 80 Proof
This is a LIE.

The FBI’s failure to alert social-media companies that the Hunter Biden laptop was real, and not mere Russian disinformation, is particularly troubling. The FBI had the laptop in their possession since December 2019 and had warned social-media companies to look for a “hack and dump” operation by the Russians prior to the 2020 election. Even after Facebook specifically asked whether the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation, Dehmlow of the FBI refused to comment, resulting in the social-media companies’ suppression of the story. As a result, millions of U.S. citizens did not hear the story prior to the November 3, 2020 election.

LINK
The provenance is dicey. Forensic analysis cannot confirm or deny the authenticity of the material.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: 80 Proof
There was an investigation, yes, into the Weiner laptop. There was nothing there. But the revelation tipped the election.

There was nothing incriminating about Joe Biden on the Hunter Biden laptop. Lots of well-coordinated efforts. Do you know by whom?
You really aren’t as smart as you think are.

Nothing incriminating about Joe?

Just 10 percent to The Big Guy, evidence of multiple meetings with foreign politicians and business people at Hunter’s request, followed by foreign money flowing through the dozens of shell accounts, and then eventually to the Bidens personally. All of which Joe had adamantly denied. So it also exposed him as an inveterate liar.
 
There was an investigation, yes, into the Weiner laptop. There was nothing there. But the revelation tipped the election.

There was nothing incriminating about Joe Biden on the Hunter Biden laptop. Lots of well-coordinated efforts. Do you know by whom?

It was confirmed as authentic. It is the laptop from Hell for Biden. A record of foreign business dealings and corruption. And it was suppressed.

There are bank records, interviews from at least 30 witnesses, whistleblower accounts and millions of documents that substantiate it.

Do you think everybody is ignorant and stupid?

STOP LYING.
 
What happened to America? Does everybody REALLY want to be censored and controlled by a totalitarian government?

Pull your head out of your ass. Jeezuzz.
 
The beauty of misinformation is it only takes one little turd to spoil the whole batch.
 
What happened to America? Does everybody REALLY want to be censored and controlled by a totalitarian government?

Pull your head out of your ass. Jeezuzz.
You know what's funny is that these people will go to the movies and root against the bad guys in the movies, the big bad censors and tyrants but then walk outside of the theater and support it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IdaCat
Hunter Biden is clearly sketch asf and there was an effort to conceal his shit by a lot of the media. Denying it is absurd at this point. The provenance questions aside the dude was 24/7 sketch and nobody would touch the stories. Whether they meant to or not it makes them complicit. Plenty of examples on the other side but a spades a spade and that spade was also a crackhead.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT