How does a publication keep the same guy since 1982? You're telling me there's no new blood to bring in?
Here's the thing about journalism that I hate. So smug journalists will pride themselves about holding people accountable and being champions of "truth" and whatever old verbage they use...
But why do we force people to talk to someone who will not be fair in coverage and uses their articles to slander, lie and bully? In your life, if you knew someone was just going to write nothing but negative stuff about you, why would you ever grant them access to you?
You cannot claim to be an impartial source when everything you write is negative and you've been doing this for decades.
Here's the thing about journalism that I hate. So smug journalists will pride themselves about holding people accountable and being champions of "truth" and whatever old verbage they use...
But why do we force people to talk to someone who will not be fair in coverage and uses their articles to slander, lie and bully? In your life, if you knew someone was just going to write nothing but negative stuff about you, why would you ever grant them access to you?
You cannot claim to be an impartial source when everything you write is negative and you've been doing this for decades.
Last edited: