He’s definitely top three or four.The Goat of what ? He is a top 10 player sure but no where near Jordan , Lebron , Russell IMO .
He’s definitely top three or four.The Goat of what ? He is a top 10 player sure but no where near Jordan , Lebron , Russell IMO .
Maybe brain is a bad choice of words, but you will have to admit he did not have the athleticism that those other guys had he made up for it with strong determination and hard work, with the exception of Jordan he would be in my opinion the greatest.What makes Bird's IQ and brain superior to Jordan's or Magic's or LeBron's or any other all-time elite?
Incredible player though. His old tapes are so much fun to watch. He was brutal when he knew he had you. All-time trash talker. Shame injuries cut him short.
This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read in my life.Jordan, top ten. but not the best and not even top 5.
Lmao. I want to watch space jam now.Larry's not white. Larry's clear.
Plus, during the eighties there were really only four great teams in the decade. Celtics, Lakers, Sixers, and eventually the Pistons. That was it. Almost all the biggest talent were on two teams so no wonder it was the same teams playing in the championship every year. The Lakers made the championship 9 times. Is that proof of how great they were or how weak the rest of the league was?Saying eras are different is fine but you said the league was more watered down today then back then which is just not true
And overall yes today’s players are more skilled..yes Larry Bird is one of the most skilled players of all time that’s why he is in the top 10 of greatest NBA players ever...but overall the players today can do more than the players back then
Jordan didn't become Jordan until Bird retired...Chicago with Jordan never won a game vs. Birds time at the Celtics.
No where near. Lol. Yeah, he sucked. Better shooter, passer, and rebounder than jordan and lebron. I would go as far as to say he was better defender..best imho.The Goat of what ? He is a top 10 player sure but no where near Jordan , Lebron , Russell IMO .
1986 celtics would have beaten the bulls. No doubt in my mind.Chicago with Jordan never won a game vs. Birds time at the Celtics.
The drafting of Bird had an immediate impact on the Celtics.
Yeah. That's beyond stupid.This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read in my life.
Chicago with Jordan never won a game vs. Birds time at the Celtics.
No where near. Lol. Yeah, he sucked. Better shooter, passer, and rebounder than jordan and lebron. I would go as far as to say he was better defender..best imho.
You can make the argument that water isn't wet but it doesn't make it so. At best Bird is top 15. There is no way that he was better than Wilt Chamberlin, Kareem, Bill Russell, Oscar Roberson, etc. LOL. You can't name a single thing that Bird did so well that required a rule change to prevent him from being unstoppable.I would say he is top 5 for sure and you can make an argument he is the best ever. He probably hit more game winning shots that any player in history. Anybody that can play a whole game left handed and still score 27 just because you're bored has to be one of the best ever.
False.The drafting of Bird had an immediate impact on the Celtics.
Well for sure I don't like him!Whether you like him as a person or not, Jordan is the greatest of all time. The actual debate begins with who's #2. For me, Lebron is 2nd, then Wilt 3rd, Magic 4th, Kareem 5th. I'd have Bill Russell 6th, Oscar Robertson 7th, Bird 8th. At number 9, Jerry West, 10 Kobe Bryant.
Maybe brain is a bad choice of words, but you will have to admit he did not have the athleticism that those other guys had he made up for it with strong determination and hard work, with the exception of Jordan he would be in my opinion the greatest.
Are you familiar with the history of the Celtics....or do you just hate Bird.False.
Isaiah Thomas said if you put him, Bird, Jordan and Magic in a room and only one could come out....it would be Bird.That's my problem with people trying to make that claim though. There's nothing to suggest that Bird worked harder or was more determined than Jordan or LeBron.
When people try to draw that line, it comes across like those guys were naturally great whereas Bird actually earned his and was smart and blah blah blah. It's insulting to other great players.
Especially because people define "athleticism" so narrowly. He wasn't as fast and didn't jump as high, sure. But he was taller, had incredible balance and natural hand-eye coordination, superhuman reaction time, and a more effortless jump shot. Repetition is important, but some guys are born better shooters than others, and Bird had that advantage coupled with all of his practice.
Ultimately, players are what they are. No one should get extra credit for being shorter or slower or whatever else. Bird was great because he was great. He isn't greater because he couldn't jump. He isn't smarter because he was slower, and guys like LeBron aren't less intelligent or dedicated because of physical traits.
Pat Riley Magic's Lakers coach: "If the game was on the line, I would want Jordan to shoot the ball. If my life was on the line, I would want Bird."False.
Isaiah Thomas said if you put him, Bird, Jordan and Magic in a room and only one could come out....it would be Bird.
More familiar than you, I'd guess. Bird is my favorite player of all-time. Bird was drafted in the 78 draft and then played his senior year at Indiana State in the 78-79 season. So him being drafted was not an immediate impact. It took a year.Are you familiar with the history of the Celtics....or do you just hate Bird.
There is no way that Bird was better than Kobe. Bird couldn't play defense if his life depended on it. The refs allowed Bird to play zone when zone wasn't allowed in the NBA because there was no way for him to play man defense.Well for sure I don't like him!
I didn't say which is better tho I do have an opinion not stated. I simply stated I do NOT like MJ.There is no way that Bird was better than Kobe. Bird couldn't play defense if he life depended on it. The refs allowed Bird to play zone when zone wasn't allowed in the NBA because there was no way for him to play man defense.
That never happened, but its a cute little story.Too slow for UK per Joe B.
Biggest mis-evaluation of all time.
Apparently not based on your reply.More familiar than you, I'd guess. Bird is my favorite player of all-time. Bird was drafted in the 78 draft and then played his senior year at Indiana State in the 78-79 season. So him being drafted was not an immediate impact. It took a year.
That is a good argument sure enough, I have never been a Lebron fan but I am confident he has worked hard and I used to read about Jordans training so I do believe they worked hard. I remember reading about Bird the morning of a game would be running the steps or shooting shot after shot and McHale would come in and Bird would ask where have you been and he would reply I have another life besides basketball, I do believe Bird had to work harder than those with more physical talents.That's my problem with people trying to make that claim though. There's nothing to suggest that Bird worked harder or was more determined than Jordan or LeBron.
When people try to draw that line, it comes across like those guys were naturally great whereas Bird actually earned his and was smart and blah blah blah. It's insulting to other great players.
Especially because people define "athleticism" so narrowly. He wasn't as fast and didn't jump as high, sure. But he was taller, had incredible balance and natural hand-eye coordination, superhuman reaction time, and a more effortless jump shot. Repetition is important, but some guys are born better shooters than others, and Bird had that advantage coupled with all of his practice.
Ultimately, players are what they are. No one should get extra credit for being shorter or slower or whatever else. Bird was great because he was great. He isn't greater because he couldn't jump. He isn't smarter because he was slower, and guys like LeBron aren't less intelligent or dedicated because of physical traits.
I'd like to hear your explanation of how he helped the Celtics(during a 29-53 season) when he was still playing for Indiana State.Apparently not based on your reply.
I thought the stories of Jordan's focus and determination were crazy too. Dude punched a team mate during a practice. His own team mate in practice. He accepted nothing short of perfection from himself and others.That is a good argument sure enough, I have never been a Lebron fan but I am confident he has worked hard and I used to read about Jordans training so I do believe they worked hard. I remember reading about Bird the morning of a game would be running the steps or shooting shot after shot and McHale would come in and Bird would ask where have you been and he would reply I have another life besides basketball, I do believe Bird had to work harder than those with more physical talents.
Well Kareem played against that list with the exception of Russell and he said Bird was the best he played against. I think I will go with Kareem's opinion. Bird would have scored 30 against anyone on that list. Ewing said he destroyed the best defensive players in the league.You can make the argument that water isn't wet but it doesn't make it so. At best Bird is top 15. There is no way that he was better than Wilt Chamberlin, Kareem, Bill Russell, Oscar Roberson, etc. LOL. You can't name a single thing that Bird did so well that required a rule change to prevent him from being unstoppable.
You are correct. It’s playoffs. I quoted it wrong.That is false lol.